From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>
Cc: Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@linux.intel.com>,
Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfc@ml01.01.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] NFC: llcp: integer underflow in nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb()
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:16:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130131081645.GA14812@elgon.mountain> (raw)
If gb_len is less than 3 it would cause an integer underflow and
possibly memory corruption in nfc_llcp_parse_gb_tlv().
I removed the old test for gb_len = 0. I also removed the test for
->remote_gb = NULL. It's not possible for ->remote_gb to be NULL and
we have already dereferenced ->remote_gb_len so it's too late to test.
The old test return -ENODEV but my test returns -EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c b/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
index 85bc75c..746f5a2 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
@@ -549,14 +549,13 @@ int nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb(struct nfc_dev *dev, u8 *gb, u8 gb_len)
pr_err("No LLCP device\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
+ if (gb_len < 3)
+ return -EINVAL;
memset(local->remote_gb, 0, NFC_MAX_GT_LEN);
memcpy(local->remote_gb, gb, gb_len);
local->remote_gb_len = gb_len;
- if (local->remote_gb = NULL || local->remote_gb_len = 0)
- return -ENODEV;
-
if (memcmp(local->remote_gb, llcp_magic, 3)) {
pr_err("MAC does not support LLCP\n");
return -EINVAL;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>
Cc: Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@linux.intel.com>,
Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfc@ml01.01.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] NFC: llcp: integer underflow in nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb()
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:16:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130131081645.GA14812@elgon.mountain> (raw)
If gb_len is less than 3 it would cause an integer underflow and
possibly memory corruption in nfc_llcp_parse_gb_tlv().
I removed the old test for gb_len == 0. I also removed the test for
->remote_gb == NULL. It's not possible for ->remote_gb to be NULL and
we have already dereferenced ->remote_gb_len so it's too late to test.
The old test return -ENODEV but my test returns -EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c b/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
index 85bc75c..746f5a2 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c
@@ -549,14 +549,13 @@ int nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb(struct nfc_dev *dev, u8 *gb, u8 gb_len)
pr_err("No LLCP device\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
+ if (gb_len < 3)
+ return -EINVAL;
memset(local->remote_gb, 0, NFC_MAX_GT_LEN);
memcpy(local->remote_gb, gb, gb_len);
local->remote_gb_len = gb_len;
- if (local->remote_gb == NULL || local->remote_gb_len == 0)
- return -ENODEV;
-
if (memcmp(local->remote_gb, llcp_magic, 3)) {
pr_err("MAC does not support LLCP\n");
return -EINVAL;
next reply other threads:[~2013-01-31 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 8:16 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2013-01-31 8:16 ` [patch] NFC: llcp: integer underflow in nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb() Dan Carpenter
2013-02-07 10:16 ` Szymon Janc
2013-02-07 10:16 ` Szymon Janc
2013-02-07 10:16 ` Szymon Janc
2013-03-01 5:20 ` [patch] NFC: llcp: cleanup underflow check Dan Carpenter
2013-03-01 5:20 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130131081645.GA14812@elgon.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lauro.venancio@openbossa.org \
--cc=linux-nfc@ml01.01.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=szymon.janc@tieto.com \
--cc=thierry.escande@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.