All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: ppcdev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	oleg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] uprobes: add trap variant helper
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:36:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130326120602.GA20399@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130322151627.GB20010@in.ibm.com>

* Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> [2013-03-22 20:46:27]:

> From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
> 
> Some architectures like powerpc have multiple variants of the trap
> instruction. Introduce an additional helper is_trap_insn() for run-time
> handling of non-uprobe traps on such architectures.
> 
> While there, change is_swbp_at_addr() to is_trap_at_addr() for reading
> clarity.
> 
> With this change, the uprobe registration path will supercede any trap
> instruction inserted at the requested location, while taking care of
> delivering the SIGTRAP for cases where the trap notification came in
> for an address without a uprobe. See [1] for a more detailed explanation.
> 
> [1] https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2013-March/104771.html
> 
> This change was suggested by Oleg Nesterov.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>

Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/uprobes.h |    1 +
>  kernel/events/uprobes.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-3.9-rc3/include/linux/uprobes.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.9-rc3.orig/include/linux/uprobes.h
> +++ linux-3.9-rc3/include/linux/uprobes.h
> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ struct uprobes_state {
>  extern int __weak set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr);
>  extern int __weak set_orig_insn(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr);
>  extern bool __weak is_swbp_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn);
> +extern bool __weak is_trap_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn);
>  extern int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
>  extern int uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool);
>  extern void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
> Index: linux-3.9-rc3/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.9-rc3.orig/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ linux-3.9-rc3/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,20 @@ bool __weak is_swbp_insn(uprobe_opcode_t
>  	return *insn == UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
>  }
> 
> +/**
> + * is_trap_insn - check if instruction is breakpoint instruction.
> + * @insn: instruction to be checked.
> + * Default implementation of is_trap_insn
> + * Returns true if @insn is a breakpoint instruction.
> + *
> + * This function is needed for the case where an architecture has multiple
> + * trap instructions (like powerpc).
> + */
> +bool __weak is_trap_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn)
> +{
> +	return is_swbp_insn(insn);
> +}
> +
>  static void copy_opcode(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr, uprobe_opcode_t *opcode)
>  {
>  	void *kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
> @@ -185,6 +199,15 @@ static int verify_opcode(struct page *pa
>  	uprobe_opcode_t old_opcode;
>  	bool is_swbp;
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * Note: We only check if the old_opcode is UPROBE_SWBP_INSN here.
> +	 * We do not check if it is any other 'trap variant' which could
> +	 * be conditional trap instruction such as the one powerpc supports.
> +	 *
> +	 * The logic is that we do not care if the underlying instruction
> +	 * is a trap variant; uprobes always wins over any other (gdb)
> +	 * breakpoint.
> +	 */
>  	copy_opcode(page, vaddr, &old_opcode);
>  	is_swbp = is_swbp_insn(&old_opcode);
> 
> @@ -204,7 +227,7 @@ static int verify_opcode(struct page *pa
>   * Expect the breakpoint instruction to be the smallest size instruction for
>   * the architecture. If an arch has variable length instruction and the
>   * breakpoint instruction is not of the smallest length instruction
> - * supported by that architecture then we need to modify is_swbp_at_addr and
> + * supported by that architecture then we need to modify is_trap_at_addr and
>   * write_opcode accordingly. This would never be a problem for archs that
>   * have fixed length instructions.
>   */
> @@ -1431,7 +1454,7 @@ static void mmf_recalc_uprobes(struct mm
>  	clear_bit(MMF_HAS_UPROBES, &mm->flags);
>  }
> 
> -static int is_swbp_at_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
> +static int is_trap_at_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
>  {
>  	struct page *page;
>  	uprobe_opcode_t opcode;
> @@ -1452,7 +1475,8 @@ static int is_swbp_at_addr(struct mm_str
>  	copy_opcode(page, vaddr, &opcode);
>  	put_page(page);
>   out:
> -	return is_swbp_insn(&opcode);
> +	/* This needs to return true for any variant of the trap insn */
> +	return is_trap_insn(&opcode);
>  }
> 
>  static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe(unsigned long bp_vaddr, int *is_swbp)
> @@ -1472,7 +1496,7 @@ static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe
>  		}
> 
>  		if (!uprobe)
> -			*is_swbp = is_swbp_at_addr(mm, bp_vaddr);
> +			*is_swbp = is_trap_at_addr(mm, bp_vaddr);
>  	} else {
>  		*is_swbp = -EFAULT;
>  	}

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	oleg@redhat.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	ppcdev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] uprobes: add trap variant helper
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:36:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130326120602.GA20399@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130322151627.GB20010@in.ibm.com>

* Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> [2013-03-22 20:46:27]:

> From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
> 
> Some architectures like powerpc have multiple variants of the trap
> instruction. Introduce an additional helper is_trap_insn() for run-time
> handling of non-uprobe traps on such architectures.
> 
> While there, change is_swbp_at_addr() to is_trap_at_addr() for reading
> clarity.
> 
> With this change, the uprobe registration path will supercede any trap
> instruction inserted at the requested location, while taking care of
> delivering the SIGTRAP for cases where the trap notification came in
> for an address without a uprobe. See [1] for a more detailed explanation.
> 
> [1] https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2013-March/104771.html
> 
> This change was suggested by Oleg Nesterov.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>

Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/uprobes.h |    1 +
>  kernel/events/uprobes.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-3.9-rc3/include/linux/uprobes.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.9-rc3.orig/include/linux/uprobes.h
> +++ linux-3.9-rc3/include/linux/uprobes.h
> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ struct uprobes_state {
>  extern int __weak set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr);
>  extern int __weak set_orig_insn(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr);
>  extern bool __weak is_swbp_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn);
> +extern bool __weak is_trap_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn);
>  extern int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
>  extern int uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool);
>  extern void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
> Index: linux-3.9-rc3/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.9-rc3.orig/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ linux-3.9-rc3/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,20 @@ bool __weak is_swbp_insn(uprobe_opcode_t
>  	return *insn == UPROBE_SWBP_INSN;
>  }
> 
> +/**
> + * is_trap_insn - check if instruction is breakpoint instruction.
> + * @insn: instruction to be checked.
> + * Default implementation of is_trap_insn
> + * Returns true if @insn is a breakpoint instruction.
> + *
> + * This function is needed for the case where an architecture has multiple
> + * trap instructions (like powerpc).
> + */
> +bool __weak is_trap_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn)
> +{
> +	return is_swbp_insn(insn);
> +}
> +
>  static void copy_opcode(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr, uprobe_opcode_t *opcode)
>  {
>  	void *kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
> @@ -185,6 +199,15 @@ static int verify_opcode(struct page *pa
>  	uprobe_opcode_t old_opcode;
>  	bool is_swbp;
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * Note: We only check if the old_opcode is UPROBE_SWBP_INSN here.
> +	 * We do not check if it is any other 'trap variant' which could
> +	 * be conditional trap instruction such as the one powerpc supports.
> +	 *
> +	 * The logic is that we do not care if the underlying instruction
> +	 * is a trap variant; uprobes always wins over any other (gdb)
> +	 * breakpoint.
> +	 */
>  	copy_opcode(page, vaddr, &old_opcode);
>  	is_swbp = is_swbp_insn(&old_opcode);
> 
> @@ -204,7 +227,7 @@ static int verify_opcode(struct page *pa
>   * Expect the breakpoint instruction to be the smallest size instruction for
>   * the architecture. If an arch has variable length instruction and the
>   * breakpoint instruction is not of the smallest length instruction
> - * supported by that architecture then we need to modify is_swbp_at_addr and
> + * supported by that architecture then we need to modify is_trap_at_addr and
>   * write_opcode accordingly. This would never be a problem for archs that
>   * have fixed length instructions.
>   */
> @@ -1431,7 +1454,7 @@ static void mmf_recalc_uprobes(struct mm
>  	clear_bit(MMF_HAS_UPROBES, &mm->flags);
>  }
> 
> -static int is_swbp_at_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
> +static int is_trap_at_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
>  {
>  	struct page *page;
>  	uprobe_opcode_t opcode;
> @@ -1452,7 +1475,8 @@ static int is_swbp_at_addr(struct mm_str
>  	copy_opcode(page, vaddr, &opcode);
>  	put_page(page);
>   out:
> -	return is_swbp_insn(&opcode);
> +	/* This needs to return true for any variant of the trap insn */
> +	return is_trap_insn(&opcode);
>  }
> 
>  static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe(unsigned long bp_vaddr, int *is_swbp)
> @@ -1472,7 +1496,7 @@ static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe
>  		}
> 
>  		if (!uprobe)
> -			*is_swbp = is_swbp_at_addr(mm, bp_vaddr);
> +			*is_swbp = is_trap_at_addr(mm, bp_vaddr);
>  	} else {
>  		*is_swbp = -EFAULT;
>  	}

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-26 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-22 15:16 [PATCH v2 1/4] uprobes: add trap variant helper Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2013-03-22 15:16 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2013-03-22 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] uprobes: refuse uprobe on trap variants Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2013-03-22 15:17   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2013-03-26 12:06   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-03-26 12:06     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-03-22 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] uprobes/powerpc: teach uprobes to ignore gdb breakpoints Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2013-03-22 15:18   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2013-03-26 12:06   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-03-26 12:06     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-03-22 15:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] uprobes/powerpc: remove additional trap instruction check Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2013-03-22 15:19   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2013-03-26 12:07   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-03-26 12:07     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-03-23 18:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] uprobes: add trap variant helper Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-23 18:08   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-26 12:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2013-03-26 12:06   ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130326120602.GA20399@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.