From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: move <mach/powergate.h> to <linux/tegra-powergate.h>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 17:14:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304011714.50703.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5159B0FF.2010408-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
On Monday 01 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/30/2013 08:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Saturday 30 March 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > If not, we can probably take your patch for now, if you remove it
> > again for 3.11.
>
> There are at least a couple of different things in this file:
>
> a) The reset API, which definitely should be converted to the new reset
> API. I can't make any promises about which kernel release that will
> happen in, but it's definitely something we know we have to do.
>
> b) Power-gating. This should probably be converted to use the
> powerdomains code. I believe Joseph Lo is aware of this, but again I
> can't promise any specific time-scale at this time.
>
> So is this still OK, without any promises of timescale?
>
Yes, sounds good.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: move <mach/powergate.h> to <linux/tegra-powergate.h>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 17:14:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304011714.50703.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5159B0FF.2010408@wwwdotorg.org>
On Monday 01 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/30/2013 08:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Saturday 30 March 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > If not, we can probably take your patch for now, if you remove it
> > again for 3.11.
>
> There are at least a couple of different things in this file:
>
> a) The reset API, which definitely should be converted to the new reset
> API. I can't make any promises about which kernel release that will
> happen in, but it's definitely something we know we have to do.
>
> b) Power-gating. This should probably be converted to use the
> powerdomains code. I believe Joseph Lo is aware of this, but again I
> can't promise any specific time-scale at this time.
>
> So is this still OK, without any promises of timescale?
>
Yes, sounds good.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-01 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-30 0:19 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: move <mach/powergate.h> to <linux/tegra-powergate.h> Stephen Warren
2013-03-30 0:19 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <1364602790-10759-1-git-send-email-swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-30 0:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: convert to multi-platform Stephen Warren
2013-03-30 0:19 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <1364602790-10759-2-git-send-email-swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-30 14:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-30 14:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-30 14:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: move <mach/powergate.h> to <linux/tegra-powergate.h> Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-30 14:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <201303301413.26549.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-01 16:08 ` Stephen Warren
2013-04-01 16:08 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <5159B0FF.2010408-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-01 17:14 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-04-01 17:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 15:57 ` Stephen Warren
2013-04-02 15:57 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201304011714.50703.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd-r2ngtmty4d4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.