From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Dan Williams <djbw@fb.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:56:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5163C103.8020101@ti.com>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:19:31AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 04/09/2013 08:52 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> >> I suggest Peter resend the patch with also Grant + Linus W cc:d so
> >> they can queue it unless there are other related patches pending
> >> somewhere else.
> >>
> > Am curious on your suggestion. DMA engine patches are going via Vinod
> > Koul's tree so I think the $subject patch should follow the same
> > tree, No ?
>
> AFAIK Vinod should be the correct person to pick it up, but I can CC Grant and
> Linus W as well.
Yes it should go thru dmaengine tree, sorry was travelling hence the delay, pls
resend the patch and I will do the needful
>
> > Peter, if you plan to re-send, feel free to add my ack.
>
> I'll figure out which stable release should have this applied and will resend.
>
> --
> Péter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:56:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5163C103.8020101@ti.com>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:19:31AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 04/09/2013 08:52 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> >> I suggest Peter resend the patch with also Grant + Linus W cc:d so
> >> they can queue it unless there are other related patches pending
> >> somewhere else.
> >>
> > Am curious on your suggestion. DMA engine patches are going via Vinod
> > Koul's tree so I think the $subject patch should follow the same
> > tree, No ?
>
> AFAIK Vinod should be the correct person to pick it up, but I can CC Grant and
> Linus W as well.
Yes it should go thru dmaengine tree, sorry was travelling hence the delay, pls
resend the patch and I will do the needful
>
> > Peter, if you plan to re-send, feel free to add my ack.
>
> I'll figure out which stable release should have this applied and will resend.
>
> --
> P?ter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-09 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 11:17 [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-03 11:17 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-03 11:17 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-03 11:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-03 11:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-03 11:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-03 11:52 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-03 11:52 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-03 11:52 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-03 12:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-03 12:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-03 12:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-08 7:11 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-08 7:11 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-08 7:11 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-08 17:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-08 17:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-08 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-08 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-09 6:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-09 6:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-09 6:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-09 7:19 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:19 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:19 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:26 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2013-04-09 7:26 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-09 10:20 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 10:20 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 10:20 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:19 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:19 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:19 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:21 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:21 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:21 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 13:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-09 13:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=djbw@fb.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.