From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>, Dan Williams <djbw@fb.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:20:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5163EB61.3000507@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com>
On 04/09/2013 09:26 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Yes it should go thru dmaengine tree, sorry was travelling hence the delay, pls
> resend the patch and I will do the needful
I already have the patch rebased on today's linux-next, just waiting for
Russell to confirm that I can add his Acked-by to the patch.
I take this from Russell as ACK: "Now that I'm back from a short 4 day break,
then yes, and the answer is that it's fine. Who's handling the patch?"
But I want to be sure I can add that line...
--
Péter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (Peter Ujfalusi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:20:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5163EB61.3000507@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com>
On 04/09/2013 09:26 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Yes it should go thru dmaengine tree, sorry was travelling hence the delay, pls
> resend the patch and I will do the needful
I already have the patch rebased on today's linux-next, just waiting for
Russell to confirm that I can add his Acked-by to the patch.
I take this from Russell as ACK: "Now that I'm back from a short 4 day break,
then yes, and the answer is that it's fine. Who's handling the patch?"
But I want to be sure I can add that line...
--
P?ter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Dan Williams <djbw@fb.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:20:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5163EB61.3000507@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com>
On 04/09/2013 09:26 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Yes it should go thru dmaengine tree, sorry was travelling hence the delay, pls
> resend the patch and I will do the needful
I already have the patch rebased on today's linux-next, just waiting for
Russell to confirm that I can add his Acked-by to the patch.
I take this from Russell as ACK: "Now that I'm back from a short 4 day break,
then yes, and the answer is that it's fine. Who's handling the patch?"
But I want to be sure I can add that line...
--
Péter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-09 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 11:17 [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-03 11:17 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-03 11:17 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-03 11:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-03 11:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-03 11:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-03 11:52 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-03 11:52 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-03 11:52 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-03 12:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-03 12:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-03 12:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-08 7:11 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-08 7:11 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-08 7:11 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-08 17:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-08 17:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-08 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-08 17:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-09 6:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-09 6:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-09 6:52 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-09 7:19 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:19 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:19 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:26 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-09 7:26 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-09 10:20 ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2013-04-09 10:20 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 10:20 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:19 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:19 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:19 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:21 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:21 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 7:21 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2013-04-09 13:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-09 13:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5163EB61.3000507@ti.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=djbw@fb.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.