From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: mmci: Allow MMCI to request channels with information acquired from DT
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:50:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304171550.56037.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366205534-25079-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
On Wednesday 17 April 2013, Lee Jones wrote:
> #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE
> -static void mmci_dma_setup(struct mmci_host *host)
> +static void mmci_dma_setup(struct amba_device *dev,
> + struct mmci_host *host)
> {
> + struct device_node *np = dev->dev.of_node;
> struct mmci_platform_data *plat = host->plat;
> const char *rxname, *txname;
> dma_cap_mask_t mask;
> + const char *chan_name;
> + int count, i;
> + bool do_tx = false, do_rx = false;
>
> if (!plat || !plat->dma_filter) {
> - dev_info(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "no DMA platform data\n");
> - return;
> + if (np) {
> + count = of_property_count_strings(np, "dma-names");
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> + of_property_read_string_index(np, "dma-names",
> + i, &chan_name);
> + if (strcmp(chan_name, "tx"))
> + do_tx = true;
> + else if (strcmp(chan_name, "rx"))
> + do_rx = true;
> + }
> + } else {
> + dev_info(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "no DMA platform data\n");
> + return;
> + }
> }
This looks unnecessarily complex.
> /* initialize pre request cookie */
> @@ -321,19 +338,21 @@ static void mmci_dma_setup(struct mmci_host *host)
> * attempt to use it bidirectionally, however if it is
> * is specified but cannot be located, DMA will be disabled.
> */
> - if (plat->dma_rx_param) {
> - host->dma_rx_channel = dma_request_channel(mask,
> - plat->dma_filter,
> - plat->dma_rx_param);
> + if (plat->dma_rx_param || do_rx) {
> + host->dma_rx_channel = dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask,
> + (plat) ? plat->dma_filter : NULL,
> + (plat) ? plat->dma_rx_param : NULL,
> + &dev->dev, "rx");
> /* E.g if no DMA hardware is present */
> if (!host->dma_rx_channel)
> dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "no RX DMA channel\n");
> }
Why not just do dma_request_slave_channel_compat() unconditionally here?
It's not an error for MMCI if that fails. If you want to keep the warning
in the case dma_rx_channel is provided by not working, you can do it like
host->dma_rx_channel = dma_request_slave_channel(dev, "rx");
if (!host->dma_rx_channel && plat->dma_rx_param) {
host->dma_rx_channel = dma_request_channel(mask,
plat->dma_filter,
plat->dma_rx_param);
...
}
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: mmci: Allow MMCI to request channels with information acquired from DT
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:50:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304171550.56037.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366205534-25079-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
On Wednesday 17 April 2013, Lee Jones wrote:
> #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE
> -static void mmci_dma_setup(struct mmci_host *host)
> +static void mmci_dma_setup(struct amba_device *dev,
> + struct mmci_host *host)
> {
> + struct device_node *np = dev->dev.of_node;
> struct mmci_platform_data *plat = host->plat;
> const char *rxname, *txname;
> dma_cap_mask_t mask;
> + const char *chan_name;
> + int count, i;
> + bool do_tx = false, do_rx = false;
>
> if (!plat || !plat->dma_filter) {
> - dev_info(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "no DMA platform data\n");
> - return;
> + if (np) {
> + count = of_property_count_strings(np, "dma-names");
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> + of_property_read_string_index(np, "dma-names",
> + i, &chan_name);
> + if (strcmp(chan_name, "tx"))
> + do_tx = true;
> + else if (strcmp(chan_name, "rx"))
> + do_rx = true;
> + }
> + } else {
> + dev_info(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "no DMA platform data\n");
> + return;
> + }
> }
This looks unnecessarily complex.
> /* initialize pre request cookie */
> @@ -321,19 +338,21 @@ static void mmci_dma_setup(struct mmci_host *host)
> * attempt to use it bidirectionally, however if it is
> * is specified but cannot be located, DMA will be disabled.
> */
> - if (plat->dma_rx_param) {
> - host->dma_rx_channel = dma_request_channel(mask,
> - plat->dma_filter,
> - plat->dma_rx_param);
> + if (plat->dma_rx_param || do_rx) {
> + host->dma_rx_channel = dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask,
> + (plat) ? plat->dma_filter : NULL,
> + (plat) ? plat->dma_rx_param : NULL,
> + &dev->dev, "rx");
> /* E.g if no DMA hardware is present */
> if (!host->dma_rx_channel)
> dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "no RX DMA channel\n");
> }
Why not just do dma_request_slave_channel_compat() unconditionally here?
It's not an error for MMCI if that fails. If you want to keep the warning
in the case dma_rx_channel is provided by not working, you can do it like
host->dma_rx_channel = dma_request_slave_channel(dev, "rx");
if (!host->dma_rx_channel && plat->dma_rx_param) {
host->dma_rx_channel = dma_request_channel(mask,
plat->dma_filter,
plat->dma_rx_param);
...
}
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-17 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-17 13:32 [PATCH] mmc: mmci: Allow MMCI to request channels with information acquired from DT Lee Jones
2013-04-17 13:32 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-17 13:50 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-04-17 13:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-17 15:04 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-17 15:04 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-17 15:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-17 15:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-17 15:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-18 8:02 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 8:02 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 8:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 8:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 9:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-18 9:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-18 9:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 9:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 8:21 ` Ulf Hansson
2013-04-18 8:21 ` Ulf Hansson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-24 10:58 Lee Jones
2013-04-24 10:58 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-30 13:01 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-30 13:01 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-30 13:12 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-30 13:12 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201304171550.56037.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.