From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
'Thomas Abraham' <thomas.ab@samsung.com>,
'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
'Olof Johansson' <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: EXYNOS: no more support non-DT for EXYNOS SoCs
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:11:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304222111.45653.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51756E98.9040606@samsung.com>
On Monday 22 April 2013, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 04/10/13 23:05, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > On 04/10/13 22:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 10 April 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >>> Hmm, it turns out we are still actively using some boards based on
> >>> Exynos4210 EVT0 SoCs. And since it seems unlikely the patches from
> >>> Tomasz [1] adding basic DT support for those will get merged for
> >>> 3.10, it would be a bit inconvenient to remove the ATAGS support
> >>> now, leaving Exynos4210 Rev. 0 not supported at all.
> >>
> >> I still have hope to get those included.
> >>
> > I agree and I asked Tomasz to re-send universal dt patch.
> >
> Hi Arnd and Olof,
>
> Is it possible to send one more pull-request for this and something like
> dt patches for exynos?
I think it's too late for that now, let's just fix the broken pieces
now and do the minimum amount of patches on top of what we have:
* Thomas Abraham's fix for the clk code
* Tomasz Figa's patch to restore Universal C210
* Whatever is needed to get USB working again on Arndale
* Anything else that comes up that is really a bug fix.
* Getting the PWM and ADC drivers working with DT, that can
easily be done.
* Possibly a patch to mark CONFIG_EXYNOS_ATAGS as broken,
if you think that helps.
but not:
* The entire series to rework the PWM clock from Tomasz
* The entire series to remove ATAGS support on Exynos
* Any other non-bugfix patches
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: EXYNOS: no more support non-DT for EXYNOS SoCs
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:11:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304222111.45653.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51756E98.9040606@samsung.com>
On Monday 22 April 2013, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 04/10/13 23:05, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > On 04/10/13 22:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 10 April 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >>> Hmm, it turns out we are still actively using some boards based on
> >>> Exynos4210 EVT0 SoCs. And since it seems unlikely the patches from
> >>> Tomasz [1] adding basic DT support for those will get merged for
> >>> 3.10, it would be a bit inconvenient to remove the ATAGS support
> >>> now, leaving Exynos4210 Rev. 0 not supported at all.
> >>
> >> I still have hope to get those included.
> >>
> > I agree and I asked Tomasz to re-send universal dt patch.
> >
> Hi Arnd and Olof,
>
> Is it possible to send one more pull-request for this and something like
> dt patches for exynos?
I think it's too late for that now, let's just fix the broken pieces
now and do the minimum amount of patches on top of what we have:
* Thomas Abraham's fix for the clk code
* Tomasz Figa's patch to restore Universal C210
* Whatever is needed to get USB working again on Arndale
* Anything else that comes up that is really a bug fix.
* Getting the PWM and ADC drivers working with DT, that can
easily be done.
* Possibly a patch to mark CONFIG_EXYNOS_ATAGS as broken,
if you think that helps.
but not:
* The entire series to rework the PWM clock from Tomasz
* The entire series to remove ATAGS support on Exynos
* Any other non-bugfix patches
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-09 15:02 [PATCH RESEND] ARM: EXYNOS: no more support non-DT for EXYNOS SoCs kgene.kim
2013-04-09 15:02 ` kgene.kim at gmail.com
2013-04-10 10:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-10 10:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-10 10:41 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-04-10 10:41 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-04-10 12:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-10 12:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-10 13:46 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-04-10 13:46 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-04-10 13:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-10 13:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-10 14:05 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-10 14:05 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-22 17:08 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-22 17:08 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-22 19:11 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-04-22 19:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-23 14:14 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-23 14:14 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-05-14 12:40 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-05-14 12:40 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201304222111.45653.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.