All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	'Thomas Abraham' <thomas.ab@samsung.com>,
	'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	'Olof Johansson' <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: EXYNOS: no more support non-DT for EXYNOS SoCs
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:05:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516571BC.9030909@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201304101555.27984.arnd@arndb.de>

On 04/10/13 22:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 April 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> Hmm, it turns out we are still actively using some boards based on
>> Exynos4210 EVT0 SoCs. And since it seems unlikely the patches from
>> Tomasz [1] adding basic DT support for those will get merged for
>> 3.10, it would be a bit inconvenient to remove the ATAGS support
>> now, leaving Exynos4210 Rev. 0 not supported at all.
>
> I still have hope to get those included.
>
I agree and I asked Tomasz to re-send universal dt patch.

>> Not sure what's others opinion on that, and what would be an advantage
>> of removing non-dt support for Exynos now, rather than in 3.11, vs. any
>> possible inconvenience and regressions this could cause.
>
> A multiplatform kernel will not work on an ATAGS based Exynos platform,
> but I think we can have it both ways and allow either multiplatform
> DT-only or single-platform with both DT and ATAGS in 3.10.
>
I think, if possible, keeping both way would be nice to us.

Thanks.

- Kukjin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: EXYNOS: no more support non-DT for EXYNOS SoCs
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:05:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516571BC.9030909@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201304101555.27984.arnd@arndb.de>

On 04/10/13 22:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 April 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> Hmm, it turns out we are still actively using some boards based on
>> Exynos4210 EVT0 SoCs. And since it seems unlikely the patches from
>> Tomasz [1] adding basic DT support for those will get merged for
>> 3.10, it would be a bit inconvenient to remove the ATAGS support
>> now, leaving Exynos4210 Rev. 0 not supported at all.
>
> I still have hope to get those included.
>
I agree and I asked Tomasz to re-send universal dt patch.

>> Not sure what's others opinion on that, and what would be an advantage
>> of removing non-dt support for Exynos now, rather than in 3.11, vs. any
>> possible inconvenience and regressions this could cause.
>
> A multiplatform kernel will not work on an ATAGS based Exynos platform,
> but I think we can have it both ways and allow either multiplatform
> DT-only or single-platform with both DT and ATAGS in 3.10.
>
I think, if possible, keeping both way would be nice to us.

Thanks.

- Kukjin

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-10 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-09 15:02 [PATCH RESEND] ARM: EXYNOS: no more support non-DT for EXYNOS SoCs kgene.kim
2013-04-09 15:02 ` kgene.kim at gmail.com
2013-04-10 10:34 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-10 10:34   ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-10 10:41   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-04-10 10:41     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-04-10 12:59     ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-10 12:59       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-10 13:46       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-04-10 13:46         ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-04-10 13:55         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-10 13:55           ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-10 14:05           ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2013-04-10 14:05             ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-22 17:08             ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-22 17:08               ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-22 19:11               ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 19:11                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-23 14:14                 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-23 14:14                   ` Kukjin Kim
2013-05-14 12:40                   ` Kukjin Kim
2013-05-14 12:40                     ` Kukjin Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516571BC.9030909@samsung.com \
    --to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.