From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lisa.mitchell@hp.com, kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp,
ebiederm@xmission.com, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cpw@sgi.com, jingbai.ma@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] vmcore: copy ELF note segments in the 2nd kernel per page vmcore objects
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:36:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130429193611.GQ8204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130413002133.18245.91528.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 09:21:33AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
[..]
> ELF notes are per-cpu, so total size of ELF note segments increases
> according to the number of CPUs. The current maximum number of CPUs on
> x86_64 is 5192, and there's already system with 4192 CPUs in SGI,
> where total size amounts to 1MB. This can be larger in the neare
> futrue or possibly even now on another architecture. Thus, to avoid
> the case where memory allocation for large block fails, we allocate
> vmcore objects per pages.
IIRC, eric had suggested using vmalloc() and remap_vmalloc_range(). What's
wrong with that? That should keep your vc_list relatively smaller.
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, cpw@sgi.com,
kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp, lisa.mitchell@hp.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com, jingbai.ma@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] vmcore: copy ELF note segments in the 2nd kernel per page vmcore objects
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:36:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130429193611.GQ8204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130413002133.18245.91528.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 09:21:33AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
[..]
> ELF notes are per-cpu, so total size of ELF note segments increases
> according to the number of CPUs. The current maximum number of CPUs on
> x86_64 is 5192, and there's already system with 4192 CPUs in SGI,
> where total size amounts to 1MB. This can be larger in the neare
> futrue or possibly even now on another architecture. Thus, to avoid
> the case where memory allocation for large block fails, we allocate
> vmcore objects per pages.
IIRC, eric had suggested using vmalloc() and remap_vmalloc_range(). What's
wrong with that? That should keep your vc_list relatively smaller.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-29 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-13 0:21 [PATCH v4 0/8] kdump, vmcore: support mmap() on /proc/vmcore HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] vmcore: allocate buffer for ELF headers on page-size alignment HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] vmcore: clean up read_vmcore() HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] vmcore, procfs: introduce MEM_TYPE_CURRENT_KERNEL flag to distinguish objects copied in 2nd kernel HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] vmcore: Add helper function vmcore_add() HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] vmcore: copy ELF note segments in the 2nd kernel per page vmcore objects HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-29 19:36 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-04-29 19:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-07 7:56 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-07 7:56 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-07 15:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-07 15:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-08 4:57 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-08 4:57 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] vmcore: count holes generated by round-up operation for page boudary for size of /proc/vmcore HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] vmcore: treat memory chunks referenced by PT_LOAD program header entries in page-size boundary in vmcore_list HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-29 19:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-29 19:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-07 7:38 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-07 7:38 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-07 15:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-07 15:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] vmcore: support mmap() on /proc/vmcore HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-25 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] kdump, " Cliff Wickman
2013-04-25 13:38 ` Cliff Wickman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130429193611.GQ8204@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jingbai.ma@hp.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lisa.mitchell@hp.com \
--cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.