From: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lisa.mitchell@hp.com, kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp,
ebiederm@xmission.com, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cpw@sgi.com, jingbai.ma@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] vmcore: treat memory chunks referenced by PT_LOAD program header entries in page-size boundary in vmcore_list
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 16:38:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5188AF5C.2070807@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130429195154.GR8204@redhat.com>
Sorry for late reply.
(2013/04/30 4:51), Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 09:21:46AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
>> Treat memory chunks referenced by PT_LOAD program header entries in
>> page-size boundary in vmcore_list. Formally, for each range [start,
>> end], we set up the corresponding vmcore object in vmcore_list to
>> [rounddown(start, PAGE_SIZE), roundup(end, PAGE_SIZE)].
>>
>> This change affects layout of /proc/vmcore. The gaps generated by the
>> rearrangement are newly made visible to applications as
>> holes. Concretely, they are two ranges [rounddown(start, PAGE_SIZE),
>> start] and [end, roundup(end, PAGE_SIZE)].
>
> Sorry did not understand this part. So if end is not page aligned, then
> we roundup(end, PAGE_SIZE) and increase the PT_LOAD size accordingly?
> Similarly for start, we do roundown().
>
> - Can you really rounddown() start? Then you will have to change start
> virtual address in program header and that's not really a good idea.
>
No, there's no need to change paddr in program header. Pleaes notice
that difference between what objects in vc_list refer to and what
PT_LOAD program headers refer to. The former covers not only kernel
memory but also the extra memory, while the latter the kernel memory only.
> - So this extra memory for end, we read from old memory and not fill
> with zeros?
Yes. The extra memory is not covered by any program header, i.e. hole.
The extra memory is not modified at all, exported with no change; if it
is used by BIOS, users can see BIOS data there. This design comes from
the discussion with Erick.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>
>> fs/proc/vmcore.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> index 029bdc0..cd0f9d9 100644
>> --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> @@ -477,16 +477,23 @@ static int __init process_ptload_program_headers_elf64(char *elfptr,
>> vmcore_off = elfsz + roundup(phdr_ptr->p_memsz, PAGE_SIZE);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < ehdr_ptr->e_phnum; i++, phdr_ptr++) {
>> + u64 paddr, start, end, size;
>> +
>> if (phdr_ptr->p_type != PT_LOAD)
>> continue;
>>
>> + paddr = phdr_ptr->p_offset;
>> + start = rounddown(paddr, PAGE_SIZE);
>> + end = roundup(paddr + phdr_ptr->p_memsz, PAGE_SIZE);
>> + size = end - start;
>> +
>> /* Add this contiguous chunk of memory to vmcore list.*/
>> - if (vmcore_add(vc_list, phdr_ptr->p_offset, phdr_ptr->p_memsz))
>> + if (vmcore_add(vc_list, start, size))
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> /* Update the program header offset. */
>> - phdr_ptr->p_offset = vmcore_off;
>> - vmcore_off = vmcore_off + phdr_ptr->p_memsz;
>> + phdr_ptr->p_offset = vmcore_off + (paddr - start);
>
> What's paddr-start. Why following is not sufficient.
>
> phdr_ptr->p_offset = vmcore_off
>
(paddr - start) is offset of the memory program header refers to, from
which kernel memory starts. Pictrically:
vmcore_off +----------------------+
| extra memory |
| (non kernel memory) |
phdr->p_offset = +----------------------+
vmcore_off + (paddr - start) | |\
| kernel memory | phdr->p_memsz
| |/
+----------------------+
| extra memory |
| (non kernel memory) |
vmcore_off + size +----------------------+
--
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lisa.mitchell@hp.com, kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp,
ebiederm@xmission.com, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cpw@sgi.com, jingbai.ma@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] vmcore: treat memory chunks referenced by PT_LOAD program header entries in page-size boundary in vmcore_list
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 16:38:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5188AF5C.2070807@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130429195154.GR8204@redhat.com>
Sorry for late reply.
(2013/04/30 4:51), Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 09:21:46AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
>> Treat memory chunks referenced by PT_LOAD program header entries in
>> page-size boundary in vmcore_list. Formally, for each range [start,
>> end], we set up the corresponding vmcore object in vmcore_list to
>> [rounddown(start, PAGE_SIZE), roundup(end, PAGE_SIZE)].
>>
>> This change affects layout of /proc/vmcore. The gaps generated by the
>> rearrangement are newly made visible to applications as
>> holes. Concretely, they are two ranges [rounddown(start, PAGE_SIZE),
>> start] and [end, roundup(end, PAGE_SIZE)].
>
> Sorry did not understand this part. So if end is not page aligned, then
> we roundup(end, PAGE_SIZE) and increase the PT_LOAD size accordingly?
> Similarly for start, we do roundown().
>
> - Can you really rounddown() start? Then you will have to change start
> virtual address in program header and that's not really a good idea.
>
No, there's no need to change paddr in program header. Pleaes notice
that difference between what objects in vc_list refer to and what
PT_LOAD program headers refer to. The former covers not only kernel
memory but also the extra memory, while the latter the kernel memory only.
> - So this extra memory for end, we read from old memory and not fill
> with zeros?
Yes. The extra memory is not covered by any program header, i.e. hole.
The extra memory is not modified at all, exported with no change; if it
is used by BIOS, users can see BIOS data there. This design comes from
the discussion with Erick.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>
>> fs/proc/vmcore.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> index 029bdc0..cd0f9d9 100644
>> --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> @@ -477,16 +477,23 @@ static int __init process_ptload_program_headers_elf64(char *elfptr,
>> vmcore_off = elfsz + roundup(phdr_ptr->p_memsz, PAGE_SIZE);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < ehdr_ptr->e_phnum; i++, phdr_ptr++) {
>> + u64 paddr, start, end, size;
>> +
>> if (phdr_ptr->p_type != PT_LOAD)
>> continue;
>>
>> + paddr = phdr_ptr->p_offset;
>> + start = rounddown(paddr, PAGE_SIZE);
>> + end = roundup(paddr + phdr_ptr->p_memsz, PAGE_SIZE);
>> + size = end - start;
>> +
>> /* Add this contiguous chunk of memory to vmcore list.*/
>> - if (vmcore_add(vc_list, phdr_ptr->p_offset, phdr_ptr->p_memsz))
>> + if (vmcore_add(vc_list, start, size))
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> /* Update the program header offset. */
>> - phdr_ptr->p_offset = vmcore_off;
>> - vmcore_off = vmcore_off + phdr_ptr->p_memsz;
>> + phdr_ptr->p_offset = vmcore_off + (paddr - start);
>
> What's paddr-start. Why following is not sufficient.
>
> phdr_ptr->p_offset = vmcore_off
>
(paddr - start) is offset of the memory program header refers to, from
which kernel memory starts. Pictrically:
vmcore_off +----------------------+
| extra memory |
| (non kernel memory) |
phdr->p_offset = +----------------------+
vmcore_off + (paddr - start) | |\
| kernel memory | phdr->p_memsz
| |/
+----------------------+
| extra memory |
| (non kernel memory) |
vmcore_off + size +----------------------+
--
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-07 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-13 0:21 [PATCH v4 0/8] kdump, vmcore: support mmap() on /proc/vmcore HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] vmcore: allocate buffer for ELF headers on page-size alignment HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] vmcore: clean up read_vmcore() HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] vmcore, procfs: introduce MEM_TYPE_CURRENT_KERNEL flag to distinguish objects copied in 2nd kernel HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] vmcore: Add helper function vmcore_add() HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] vmcore: copy ELF note segments in the 2nd kernel per page vmcore objects HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-29 19:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-29 19:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-07 7:56 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-07 7:56 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-07 15:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-07 15:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-08 4:57 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-08 4:57 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] vmcore: count holes generated by round-up operation for page boudary for size of /proc/vmcore HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] vmcore: treat memory chunks referenced by PT_LOAD program header entries in page-size boundary in vmcore_list HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-29 19:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-29 19:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-07 7:38 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke [this message]
2013-05-07 7:38 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-07 15:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-07 15:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-04-13 0:21 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] vmcore: support mmap() on /proc/vmcore HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-13 0:21 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-04-25 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] kdump, " Cliff Wickman
2013-04-25 13:38 ` Cliff Wickman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5188AF5C.2070807@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jingbai.ma@hp.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lisa.mitchell@hp.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.