All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: riel@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lisa.mitchell@hp.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	walken@google.com, cpw@sgi.com, jingbai.ma@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] vmcore: allocate ELF note segment in the 2nd kernel vmalloc memory
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 15:21:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130522192122.GE5332@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130522025606.12215.36133.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:56:06AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:

[..]
> -/* Merges all the PT_NOTE headers into one. */
> -static int __init merge_note_headers_elf64(char *elfptr, size_t *elfsz,
> -						struct list_head *vc_list)
> +/**
> + * get_note_number_and_size_elf64 - get the number of PT_NOTE program
> + * headers and sum of real size of their ELF note segment headers and
> + * data.
> + *
> + * @ehdr_ptr: ELF header
> + * @nr_ptnotep: buffer for the number of PT_NOTE program headers
> + * @phdr_szp: buffer for size of unique PT_NOTE program header

How about calling them nr_ptnote  and sz_ptnote respectively. Just feels
more readable to me.

[..]
> +static int __init copy_notes_elf64(const Elf64_Ehdr *ehdr_ptr, char *notes_buf)
> +{
> +	int i, rc=0;
> +	Elf64_Phdr *phdr_ptr;
> +	Elf64_Nhdr *nhdr_ptr;
> +	u64 phdr_sz = 0;
> +
> +	phdr_ptr = (Elf64_Phdr*)(ehdr_ptr + 1);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ehdr_ptr->e_phnum; i++, phdr_ptr++) {
> +		int j;
> +		void *notes_section;
> +		u64 offset, max_sz, sz, real_sz = 0;
> +		if (phdr_ptr->p_type != PT_NOTE)
> +			continue;
> +		max_sz = phdr_ptr->p_memsz;
> +		offset = phdr_ptr->p_offset;
> +		notes_section = kmalloc(max_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!notes_section)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> +		rc = read_from_oldmem(notes_section, max_sz, &offset, 0);
> +		if (rc < 0) {
> +			kfree(notes_section);
> +			return rc;
> +		}
> +		nhdr_ptr = notes_section;
> +		for (j = 0; j < max_sz; j += sz) {
> +			if (nhdr_ptr->n_namesz == 0)
> +				break;
> +			sz = sizeof(Elf64_Nhdr) +
> +				((nhdr_ptr->n_namesz + 3) & ~3) +
> +				((nhdr_ptr->n_descsz + 3) & ~3);
> +			real_sz += sz;
> +			nhdr_ptr = (Elf64_Nhdr*)((char*)nhdr_ptr + sz);
> +		}
> +		offset = phdr_ptr->p_offset;
> +		rc = read_from_oldmem(notes_buf + phdr_sz, real_sz,
> +				      &offset, 0);

We have already copied notes in notes_section. So there is no need to
do read_from_oldmem again.

Also going through notes size multiple times seems unnecessary. How
about writing a function which goes through notes once and updates
the size in PT_NOTE header p_memsz field. And then later
copy_notes_elf64() and get_note_number_and_size_elf64() can simply
make use of it.

Also copy_notes_elf64() does not have to cpy notes temporarily in
notes_section memory in that case.

So how about something like, update_note_header_size().


[..]
> +	vm = find_vm_area(*notes_buf);
> +	BUG_ON(!vm);
> +	vm->flags |= VM_USERMAP;
> +

This code is new and is not related to copying of notes. Can you please
move it into a separate patch with explanation.

Thanks
Vivek


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, cpw@sgi.com,
	kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp, lisa.mitchell@hp.com,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com, jingbai.ma@hp.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, riel@redhat.com, walken@google.com,
	hughd@google.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] vmcore: allocate ELF note segment in the 2nd kernel vmalloc memory
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 15:21:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130522192122.GE5332@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130522025606.12215.36133.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:56:06AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:

[..]
> -/* Merges all the PT_NOTE headers into one. */
> -static int __init merge_note_headers_elf64(char *elfptr, size_t *elfsz,
> -						struct list_head *vc_list)
> +/**
> + * get_note_number_and_size_elf64 - get the number of PT_NOTE program
> + * headers and sum of real size of their ELF note segment headers and
> + * data.
> + *
> + * @ehdr_ptr: ELF header
> + * @nr_ptnotep: buffer for the number of PT_NOTE program headers
> + * @phdr_szp: buffer for size of unique PT_NOTE program header

How about calling them nr_ptnote  and sz_ptnote respectively. Just feels
more readable to me.

[..]
> +static int __init copy_notes_elf64(const Elf64_Ehdr *ehdr_ptr, char *notes_buf)
> +{
> +	int i, rc=0;
> +	Elf64_Phdr *phdr_ptr;
> +	Elf64_Nhdr *nhdr_ptr;
> +	u64 phdr_sz = 0;
> +
> +	phdr_ptr = (Elf64_Phdr*)(ehdr_ptr + 1);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ehdr_ptr->e_phnum; i++, phdr_ptr++) {
> +		int j;
> +		void *notes_section;
> +		u64 offset, max_sz, sz, real_sz = 0;
> +		if (phdr_ptr->p_type != PT_NOTE)
> +			continue;
> +		max_sz = phdr_ptr->p_memsz;
> +		offset = phdr_ptr->p_offset;
> +		notes_section = kmalloc(max_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!notes_section)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> +		rc = read_from_oldmem(notes_section, max_sz, &offset, 0);
> +		if (rc < 0) {
> +			kfree(notes_section);
> +			return rc;
> +		}
> +		nhdr_ptr = notes_section;
> +		for (j = 0; j < max_sz; j += sz) {
> +			if (nhdr_ptr->n_namesz == 0)
> +				break;
> +			sz = sizeof(Elf64_Nhdr) +
> +				((nhdr_ptr->n_namesz + 3) & ~3) +
> +				((nhdr_ptr->n_descsz + 3) & ~3);
> +			real_sz += sz;
> +			nhdr_ptr = (Elf64_Nhdr*)((char*)nhdr_ptr + sz);
> +		}
> +		offset = phdr_ptr->p_offset;
> +		rc = read_from_oldmem(notes_buf + phdr_sz, real_sz,
> +				      &offset, 0);

We have already copied notes in notes_section. So there is no need to
do read_from_oldmem again.

Also going through notes size multiple times seems unnecessary. How
about writing a function which goes through notes once and updates
the size in PT_NOTE header p_memsz field. And then later
copy_notes_elf64() and get_note_number_and_size_elf64() can simply
make use of it.

Also copy_notes_elf64() does not have to cpy notes temporarily in
notes_section memory in that case.

So how about something like, update_note_header_size().


[..]
> +	vm = find_vm_area(*notes_buf);
> +	BUG_ON(!vm);
> +	vm->flags |= VM_USERMAP;
> +

This code is new and is not related to copying of notes. Can you please
move it into a separate patch with explanation.

Thanks
Vivek

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, cpw@sgi.com,
	kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp, lisa.mitchell@hp.com,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com, jingbai.ma@hp.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, riel@redhat.com, walken@google.com,
	hughd@google.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] vmcore: allocate ELF note segment in the 2nd kernel vmalloc memory
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 15:21:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130522192122.GE5332@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130522025606.12215.36133.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:56:06AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:

[..]
> -/* Merges all the PT_NOTE headers into one. */
> -static int __init merge_note_headers_elf64(char *elfptr, size_t *elfsz,
> -						struct list_head *vc_list)
> +/**
> + * get_note_number_and_size_elf64 - get the number of PT_NOTE program
> + * headers and sum of real size of their ELF note segment headers and
> + * data.
> + *
> + * @ehdr_ptr: ELF header
> + * @nr_ptnotep: buffer for the number of PT_NOTE program headers
> + * @phdr_szp: buffer for size of unique PT_NOTE program header

How about calling them nr_ptnote  and sz_ptnote respectively. Just feels
more readable to me.

[..]
> +static int __init copy_notes_elf64(const Elf64_Ehdr *ehdr_ptr, char *notes_buf)
> +{
> +	int i, rc=0;
> +	Elf64_Phdr *phdr_ptr;
> +	Elf64_Nhdr *nhdr_ptr;
> +	u64 phdr_sz = 0;
> +
> +	phdr_ptr = (Elf64_Phdr*)(ehdr_ptr + 1);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ehdr_ptr->e_phnum; i++, phdr_ptr++) {
> +		int j;
> +		void *notes_section;
> +		u64 offset, max_sz, sz, real_sz = 0;
> +		if (phdr_ptr->p_type != PT_NOTE)
> +			continue;
> +		max_sz = phdr_ptr->p_memsz;
> +		offset = phdr_ptr->p_offset;
> +		notes_section = kmalloc(max_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!notes_section)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> +		rc = read_from_oldmem(notes_section, max_sz, &offset, 0);
> +		if (rc < 0) {
> +			kfree(notes_section);
> +			return rc;
> +		}
> +		nhdr_ptr = notes_section;
> +		for (j = 0; j < max_sz; j += sz) {
> +			if (nhdr_ptr->n_namesz == 0)
> +				break;
> +			sz = sizeof(Elf64_Nhdr) +
> +				((nhdr_ptr->n_namesz + 3) & ~3) +
> +				((nhdr_ptr->n_descsz + 3) & ~3);
> +			real_sz += sz;
> +			nhdr_ptr = (Elf64_Nhdr*)((char*)nhdr_ptr + sz);
> +		}
> +		offset = phdr_ptr->p_offset;
> +		rc = read_from_oldmem(notes_buf + phdr_sz, real_sz,
> +				      &offset, 0);

We have already copied notes in notes_section. So there is no need to
do read_from_oldmem again.

Also going through notes size multiple times seems unnecessary. How
about writing a function which goes through notes once and updates
the size in PT_NOTE header p_memsz field. And then later
copy_notes_elf64() and get_note_number_and_size_elf64() can simply
make use of it.

Also copy_notes_elf64() does not have to cpy notes temporarily in
notes_section memory in that case.

So how about something like, update_note_header_size().


[..]
> +	vm = find_vm_area(*notes_buf);
> +	BUG_ON(!vm);
> +	vm->flags |= VM_USERMAP;
> +

This code is new and is not related to copying of notes. Can you please
move it into a separate patch with explanation.

Thanks
Vivek


  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-22 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-22  2:55 [PATCH v7 0/8] kdump, vmcore: support mmap() on /proc/vmcore HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] vmcore: clean up read_vmcore() HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] vmcore: allocate buffer for ELF headers on page-size alignment HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22 14:01   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-22 14:01     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-22 14:01     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-22  2:55 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] vmcore: treat memory chunks referenced by PT_LOAD program header entries in page-size boundary in vmcore_list HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] vmalloc: make find_vm_area check in range HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:55   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:56 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] vmalloc: introduce remap_vmalloc_range_partial HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:56   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:56   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:56 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] vmcore: allocate ELF note segment in the 2nd kernel vmalloc memory HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:56   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:56   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22 19:21   ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-05-22 19:21     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-22 19:21     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-22  2:56 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] vmcore: calculate vmcore file size from buffer size and total size of vmcore objects HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:56   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:56   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22 20:46   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-22 20:46     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-22 20:46     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-22  2:56 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] vmcore: support mmap() on /proc/vmcore HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:56   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-05-22  2:56   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130522192122.GE5332@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cpw@sgi.com \
    --cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jingbai.ma@hp.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lisa.mitchell@hp.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.