From: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org
Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 V3] perf/x86/amd: AMD IOMMU PC PERF uncore PMU implementation
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 14:18:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130528121850.GC2575@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1368819813-6481-3-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:43:32PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> index b0684e4..fcbd3b8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_UMC_32) += umc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) += perf_event.o
>
> ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD) += perf_event_amd.o perf_event_amd_uncore.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD) += perf_event_amd.o perf_event_amd_uncore.o perf_event_amd_iommu.o
This should also depend on CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU. If no IOMMU driver is
compiled in it doesn't make sense to have that PMU.
> +static int perf_iommu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> + struct perf_amd_iommu *perf_iommu;
> + u64 config, config1;
> +
> + /* test the event attr type check for PMU enumeration */
> + if (event->attr.type != event->pmu->type)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + /*
> + * IOMMU counters are shared across all cores.
> + * Therefore, it does not support per-process mode.
> + * Also, it does not support event sampling mode.
> + */
> + if (is_sampling_event(event) || event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* IOMMU counters do not have usr/os/guest/host bits */
> + if (event->attr.exclude_user || event->attr.exclude_kernel ||
> + event->attr.exclude_host || event->attr.exclude_guest)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (event->cpu < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + perf_iommu = &__perf_iommu;
> +
> + if (event->pmu != &perf_iommu->pmu)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + if (perf_iommu) {
> + config = event->attr.config;
> + config1 = event->attr.config1;
> + } else {
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* integrate with iommu base devid (0000), assume one iommu */
> + perf_iommu->max_banks =
> + amd_iommu_pc_get_max_banks(IOMMU_BASE_DEVID);
> + perf_iommu->max_counters =
> + amd_iommu_pc_get_max_counters(IOMMU_BASE_DEVID);
> +
> + /* update the hw_perf_event struct with the iommu config data */
> + hwc->config = config;
> + hwc->extra_reg.config = config1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
That implementation is very basic. Any reason for not using the event
reporting mechanism of the IOMMU? You could implement a nice perf
iommutop or something to see which devices do the most transactions or
something like that.
Joerg
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
mingo@redhat.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 V3] perf/x86/amd: AMD IOMMU PC PERF uncore PMU implementation
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 14:18:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130528121850.GC2575@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1368819813-6481-3-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:43:32PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> index b0684e4..fcbd3b8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_UMC_32) += umc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) += perf_event.o
>
> ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD) += perf_event_amd.o perf_event_amd_uncore.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD) += perf_event_amd.o perf_event_amd_uncore.o perf_event_amd_iommu.o
This should also depend on CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU. If no IOMMU driver is
compiled in it doesn't make sense to have that PMU.
> +static int perf_iommu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> + struct perf_amd_iommu *perf_iommu;
> + u64 config, config1;
> +
> + /* test the event attr type check for PMU enumeration */
> + if (event->attr.type != event->pmu->type)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + /*
> + * IOMMU counters are shared across all cores.
> + * Therefore, it does not support per-process mode.
> + * Also, it does not support event sampling mode.
> + */
> + if (is_sampling_event(event) || event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* IOMMU counters do not have usr/os/guest/host bits */
> + if (event->attr.exclude_user || event->attr.exclude_kernel ||
> + event->attr.exclude_host || event->attr.exclude_guest)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (event->cpu < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + perf_iommu = &__perf_iommu;
> +
> + if (event->pmu != &perf_iommu->pmu)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + if (perf_iommu) {
> + config = event->attr.config;
> + config1 = event->attr.config1;
> + } else {
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* integrate with iommu base devid (0000), assume one iommu */
> + perf_iommu->max_banks =
> + amd_iommu_pc_get_max_banks(IOMMU_BASE_DEVID);
> + perf_iommu->max_counters =
> + amd_iommu_pc_get_max_counters(IOMMU_BASE_DEVID);
> +
> + /* update the hw_perf_event struct with the iommu config data */
> + hwc->config = config;
> + hwc->extra_reg.config = config1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
That implementation is very basic. Any reason for not using the event
reporting mechanism of the IOMMU? You could implement a nice perf
iommutop or something to see which devices do the most transactions or
something like that.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-28 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-17 19:43 [PATCH 0/2 V3] perf/x86/amd: IOMMU Performance Counter Support suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo
2013-05-17 19:43 ` suravee.suthikulpanit
[not found] ` <1368819813-6481-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-17 19:43 ` [PATCH 1/2 V3] perf/x86/amd: Adding IOMMU PC resource management suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo
2013-05-17 19:43 ` suravee.suthikulpanit
[not found] ` <1368819813-6481-2-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-28 11:07 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-05-28 11:07 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <20130528110752.GB2575-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-28 16:28 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-05-28 16:28 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-05-17 19:43 ` [PATCH 2/2 V3] perf/x86/amd: AMD IOMMU PC PERF uncore PMU implementation suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo
2013-05-17 19:43 ` suravee.suthikulpanit
[not found] ` <1368819813-6481-3-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-28 12:18 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2013-05-28 12:18 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <20130528121850.GC2575-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-28 17:17 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-05-28 17:17 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
[not found] ` <51A4E6A8.7080004-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-29 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-29 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-20 15:41 ` [PATCH 0/2 V3] perf/x86/amd: IOMMU Performance Counter Support Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-05-20 15:41 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-05-21 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20130521091157.GD26912-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-21 13:29 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-05-21 13:29 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
[not found] ` <519B76CB.1000208-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-21 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20130521135231.GK26912-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-21 14:25 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-05-21 14:25 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <20130521142523.GD7424-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-21 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-27 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20130527163023.GA19373-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-27 17:26 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-05-27 17:26 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130528121850.GC2575@8bytes.org \
--to=joro-zlv9swrftaidnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.