All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: "Michael Büsch" <m@bues.ch>, "Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
	"Thommy Jakobsson" <thommyj@gmail.com>,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org,
	piotras@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] B43: Handle DMA RX descriptor underrun
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 13:37:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130528173736.GE2084@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A120EE.40008@lwfinger.net>

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 03:37:02PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 05/25/2013 02:42 PM, Michael B?sch wrote:
> >On Sat, 25 May 2013 21:37:32 +0200
> >Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> wrote:
> >
> >>On 05/25/2013 09:02 PM, Thommy Jakobsson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Fri, 24 May 2013, John W. Linville wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Ping?  Should I drop this one?
> >>>>
> >>>Still working great on my device, so from that I think we should go for
> >>>it. But it would be great if Rafal (or someone) tested it on some other
> >>>hardware as well.
> >>>
> >>>//Thommy
> >>
> >>This is included in OpenWrt for ~4 weeks now and I haven't read of
> >>anybody complaining about any new problems introduced by this patch or
> >>something which looks like the DMA under run.
> >>I am also for adding this to the kernel.
> >
> >I'm probably missing something, but isn't this patch already in Linus' tree?
> >It's in stable review after all.
> 
> The patch is in wireless-testing with John's s-o-b, and in the
> mainline tree with the same annotation.
> 
> It has been working OK here, but my devices did not show underrun.

OK, thanks -- sorry for the confusion!

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville at tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: "Michael Büsch" <m@bues.ch>, "Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
	"Thommy Jakobsson" <thommyj@gmail.com>,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org,
	piotras@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] B43: Handle DMA RX descriptor underrun
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 13:37:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130528173736.GE2084@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A120EE.40008@lwfinger.net>

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 03:37:02PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 05/25/2013 02:42 PM, Michael Büsch wrote:
> >On Sat, 25 May 2013 21:37:32 +0200
> >Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> wrote:
> >
> >>On 05/25/2013 09:02 PM, Thommy Jakobsson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Fri, 24 May 2013, John W. Linville wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Ping?  Should I drop this one?
> >>>>
> >>>Still working great on my device, so from that I think we should go for
> >>>it. But it would be great if Rafal (or someone) tested it on some other
> >>>hardware as well.
> >>>
> >>>//Thommy
> >>
> >>This is included in OpenWrt for ~4 weeks now and I haven't read of
> >>anybody complaining about any new problems introduced by this patch or
> >>something which looks like the DMA under run.
> >>I am also for adding this to the kernel.
> >
> >I'm probably missing something, but isn't this patch already in Linus' tree?
> >It's in stable review after all.
> 
> The patch is in wireless-testing with John's s-o-b, and in the
> mainline tree with the same annotation.
> 
> It has been working OK here, but my devices did not show underrun.

OK, thanks -- sorry for the confusion!

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-28 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-23 19:45 [PATCH] B43: Handle DMA RX descriptor underrun Thommy Jakobsson
2013-04-23 20:33 ` [PATCH] b43: rename stop-index DMA op Michael Büsch
2013-04-23 20:33   ` Michael Büsch
2013-04-24  7:00 ` [PATCH] B43: Handle DMA RX descriptor underrun Rafał Miłecki
2013-04-24  7:00   ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-05-03 17:35   ` John W. Linville
2013-05-03 19:40     ` Thommy Jakobsson
2013-05-03 19:40       ` Thommy Jakobsson
2013-05-02 13:06 ` Michael Büsch
2013-05-02 13:06   ` Michael Büsch
2013-05-02 15:01   ` Larry Finger
2013-05-02 15:01     ` Larry Finger
2013-05-05 12:44 ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-05-05 12:44   ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-05-05 13:56   ` Michael Büsch
2013-05-05 13:56     ` Michael Büsch
2013-05-05 15:34   ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-05-05 15:34     ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-05-05 19:09     ` Thommy Jakobsson
2013-05-05 19:09       ` Thommy Jakobsson
2013-05-05 15:43   ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-05-05 15:43     ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-05-05 16:31     ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-05-05 16:31       ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-05-05 17:24       ` Michael Büsch
2013-05-05 17:24         ` Michael Büsch
2013-05-05 19:50         ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-05-05 19:50           ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-05-05 19:58           ` Michael Büsch
2013-05-05 19:58             ` Michael Büsch
2013-05-05 20:06             ` Thommy Jakobsson
2013-05-05 20:06               ` Thommy Jakobsson
2013-05-05 19:59           ` Thommy Jakobsson
2013-05-05 19:59             ` Thommy Jakobsson
2013-05-05 19:22     ` Larry Finger
2013-05-05 19:22       ` Larry Finger
2013-05-13 18:27   ` Thommy Jakobsson
2013-05-13 18:27     ` Thommy Jakobsson
2013-05-24 16:49     ` John W. Linville
2013-05-24 16:49       ` John W. Linville
2013-05-25 19:02       ` Thommy Jakobsson
2013-05-25 19:02         ` Thommy Jakobsson
2013-05-25 19:37         ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-05-25 19:37           ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-05-25 19:42           ` Michael Büsch
2013-05-25 19:42             ` Michael Büsch
2013-05-25 20:37             ` Larry Finger
2013-05-25 20:37               ` Larry Finger
2013-05-28 17:37               ` John W. Linville [this message]
2013-05-28 17:37                 ` John W. Linville
2013-06-10  9:40           ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-06-10  9:40             ` Rafał Miłecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130528173736.GE2084@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m@bues.ch \
    --cc=piotras@gmail.com \
    --cc=thommyj@gmail.com \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.