From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:13:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130621104355.GG23141@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306172258.08185.arnd@arndb.de>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:58:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 17 June 2013, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> > Add dmaengine driver for hisilicon k3 platform based on virt_dma
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
> > Tested-by: Kai Yang <jean.yangkai@huawei.com>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
>
> This filter function works only as long as there is no more than
> one DMA engine in the system, which is something that needs to
> be documented better. Unfortunately, providing a filter
> function to be called by .xlate is currently the only way that
> the dma-engine API supports, but we should really get over that.
>
> Vinod: I think we need to add a way for a dmaengine driver to
> just return one of its channels to the xlate function. The
> current method is getting very silly, and it adds run-time and
> code complexity without any need.
>
> How about something like
>
> int dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan)
> {
> /* lock against __dma_request_channel */
> mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex);
>
> if (chan->client_count == 0)
> ret = dma_chan_get(chan);
> else
> ret = -EBUSY;
>
> mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex);
>
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_channel);
and you add filter on top?
This is getting you any channel and maynot work where we need to do some
filtering.
--
~vinod
--
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Zhangfei Gao
<zhangfei.gao-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:13:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130621104355.GG23141@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306172258.08185.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:58:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 17 June 2013, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> > Add dmaengine driver for hisilicon k3 platform based on virt_dma
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > Tested-by: Kai Yang <jean.yangkai-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
>
>
> This filter function works only as long as there is no more than
> one DMA engine in the system, which is something that needs to
> be documented better. Unfortunately, providing a filter
> function to be called by .xlate is currently the only way that
> the dma-engine API supports, but we should really get over that.
>
> Vinod: I think we need to add a way for a dmaengine driver to
> just return one of its channels to the xlate function. The
> current method is getting very silly, and it adds run-time and
> code complexity without any need.
>
> How about something like
>
> int dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan)
> {
> /* lock against __dma_request_channel */
> mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex);
>
> if (chan->client_count == 0)
> ret = dma_chan_get(chan);
> else
> ret = -EBUSY;
>
> mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex);
>
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_channel);
and you add filter on top?
This is getting you any channel and maynot work where we need to do some
filtering.
--
~vinod
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-21 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-17 4:54 [PATCH] dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver Zhangfei Gao
2013-06-17 4:54 ` Zhangfei Gao
2013-06-17 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-17 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 2:33 ` zhangfei gao
2013-06-18 2:33 ` zhangfei gao
2013-06-18 14:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 14:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 14:22 ` zhangfei
2013-06-18 14:22 ` zhangfei
2013-06-18 15:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 15:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-21 10:49 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-21 10:49 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-21 10:45 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-21 10:45 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-21 10:43 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2013-06-21 10:43 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-21 11:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-21 11:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-24 8:49 ` zhangfei gao
2013-06-24 8:49 ` zhangfei gao
2013-06-24 16:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-24 16:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-25 5:34 ` zhangfei gao
2013-06-25 5:34 ` zhangfei gao
2013-06-21 10:40 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-21 10:40 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-25 5:34 ` zhangfei gao
2013-06-25 5:34 ` zhangfei gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130621104355.GG23141@intel.com \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.