From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
"olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Suggestion] arch: arm64: xen: "ln -s" the paravirt.h from arm.
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:25:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130625132519.GA7222@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306241747360.4782@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 05:50:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Chen Gang wrote:
> > > Hello Maintainers:
> > >
> > > if 'CONFIG_XEN'
> > >
> > > CC arch/arm64/xen/../../arm/xen/enlighten.o
> > > arch/arm64/xen/../../arm/xen/enlighten.c:19:26: fatal error: asm/paravirt.h: No such file or directory
> > >
> > > The related .config file for next-20130624 is in attachment.
> > >
> > >
> > > If "ln -s ../../../arm/include/asm/paravirt.h paravirt.h", it can pass
> > > compiling, but I do not know how to make a patch for it ("ln -s ..."),
> > > Do we have another more suitable ways for it (or another fixing ways) ?
> > >
> > > Welcome any suggestions or completions.
> >
> > The problem is caused by:
> >
> > commit 3a885582a366caf868b0782041c44854ff4c3568
> > Author: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > Date: Wed May 29 10:56:34 2013 +0000
> >
> > xen/arm: account for stolen ticks
> >
> > that is in my tree for linux-next (even though I have not received any
> > replies from the ARM maintainers so I don't know when and if it is going
> > to go upstream).
> >
> > I think that the best thing to do would be to add a couple of ifdef
> > CONFIG_PARAVIRT in arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c. I'll add them to my tree.
>
> Actually now that we have XEN support under arm64, we can just introduce the
> same pv_time_op struct and paravirt header that this patch
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=136992435301890&w=2
>
> is introducing under arm.
I'm not sure whether I replied to your Xen pull request but the patches
have been merged into my 'upstream' branch on git.kernel.org and they'll
be going in for 3.11-rc1.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 19c1cde..47bd26b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -207,6 +207,25 @@ config FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER
> default "14" if (ARM64_64K_PAGES && TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)
> default "11"
>
> +config PARAVIRT
> + bool "Enable paravirtualization code"
> + ---help---
> + This changes the kernel so it can modify itself when it is run
> + under a hypervisor, potentially improving performance significantly
> + over full virtualization.
> +
> +config PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING
> + bool "Paravirtual steal time accounting"
> + select PARAVIRT
> + default n
No need for "default n".
If you want, I can apply this patch on top (or send me another pull
request but don't rebase your original Xen branch which I merged).
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Suggestion] arch: arm64: xen: "ln -s" the paravirt.h from arm.
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:25:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130625132519.GA7222@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306241747360.4782@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 05:50:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Chen Gang wrote:
> > > Hello Maintainers:
> > >
> > > if 'CONFIG_XEN'
> > >
> > > CC arch/arm64/xen/../../arm/xen/enlighten.o
> > > arch/arm64/xen/../../arm/xen/enlighten.c:19:26: fatal error: asm/paravirt.h: No such file or directory
> > >
> > > The related .config file for next-20130624 is in attachment.
> > >
> > >
> > > If "ln -s ../../../arm/include/asm/paravirt.h paravirt.h", it can pass
> > > compiling, but I do not know how to make a patch for it ("ln -s ..."),
> > > Do we have another more suitable ways for it (or another fixing ways) ?
> > >
> > > Welcome any suggestions or completions.
> >
> > The problem is caused by:
> >
> > commit 3a885582a366caf868b0782041c44854ff4c3568
> > Author: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > Date: Wed May 29 10:56:34 2013 +0000
> >
> > xen/arm: account for stolen ticks
> >
> > that is in my tree for linux-next (even though I have not received any
> > replies from the ARM maintainers so I don't know when and if it is going
> > to go upstream).
> >
> > I think that the best thing to do would be to add a couple of ifdef
> > CONFIG_PARAVIRT in arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c. I'll add them to my tree.
>
> Actually now that we have XEN support under arm64, we can just introduce the
> same pv_time_op struct and paravirt header that this patch
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=136992435301890&w=2
>
> is introducing under arm.
I'm not sure whether I replied to your Xen pull request but the patches
have been merged into my 'upstream' branch on git.kernel.org and they'll
be going in for 3.11-rc1.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 19c1cde..47bd26b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -207,6 +207,25 @@ config FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER
> default "14" if (ARM64_64K_PAGES && TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)
> default "11"
>
> +config PARAVIRT
> + bool "Enable paravirtualization code"
> + ---help---
> + This changes the kernel so it can modify itself when it is run
> + under a hypervisor, potentially improving performance significantly
> + over full virtualization.
> +
> +config PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING
> + bool "Paravirtual steal time accounting"
> + select PARAVIRT
> + default n
No need for "default n".
If you want, I can apply this patch on top (or send me another pull
request but don't rebase your original Xen branch which I merged).
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-22 5:54 [PATCH] arch: arm64: kernel: add '#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT' for aarch32_break_handler() Chen Gang
2013-06-22 5:54 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-24 8:47 ` Will Deacon
2013-06-24 8:47 ` Will Deacon
2013-06-24 9:19 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-24 9:19 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-24 9:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Chen Gang
2013-06-24 9:27 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-24 10:06 ` [Suggestion] arch: arm64: xen: "ln -s" the paravirt.h from arm Chen Gang
2013-06-24 15:43 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-24 15:43 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-24 16:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-24 16:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-25 1:31 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-25 1:31 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-25 12:32 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-25 12:32 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-25 13:25 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-06-25 13:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-25 15:54 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-25 15:54 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-24 10:14 ` [PATCH v2] arch: arm64: kernel: add '#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT' for aarch32_break_handler() Will Deacon
2013-06-24 10:14 ` Will Deacon
2013-06-24 10:16 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-24 10:16 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130625132519.GA7222@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.