* of_pci_range_parser patch series
@ 2013-06-27 8:54 Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2013-06-27 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Murray, Michal Simek, microblaze-uclinux, linux-mips,
John Crispin, David Daney
Andrew,
I noticed that [1] is now in -next but not the MIPS patch [2], not the
MicroBlaze patch [3]. What is the reason for that? If it's only the
lack of an ack, here's mine for the MIPS version:
Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Thanks,
Ralf
[1] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5218/
[2] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5217/
[3] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5216/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: of_pci_range_parser patch series
[not found] <BF39C5705592B0469C55326EC158C01A80307EBE26@GEORGE.Emea.Arm.com>
@ 2013-07-05 13:29 ` Andrew Murray
2013-07-05 17:19 ` Jason Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Murray @ 2013-07-05 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ralf
Cc: Andrew.Murray, monstr, microblaze-uclinux, linux-mips, blogic,
ddaney, jason
> Andrew,
>
> I noticed that [1] is now in -next but not the MIPS patch [2], not the
> MicroBlaze patch [3]. What is the reason for that? If it's only the
> lack of an ack, here's mine for the MIPS version:
There was no reason other that the missing acks.
>
> Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Thanks for this.
Jason - is it possible/best to take this through your tree?
Andrew Murray
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ralf
>
> [1] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5218/
> [2] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5217/
> [3] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5216/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: of_pci_range_parser patch series
2013-07-05 13:29 ` of_pci_range_parser patch series Andrew Murray
@ 2013-07-05 17:19 ` Jason Cooper
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Cooper @ 2013-07-05 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Murray
Cc: ralf, Andrew.Murray, monstr, microblaze-uclinux, linux-mips,
blogic, ddaney
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 02:29:44PM +0100, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > I noticed that [1] is now in -next but not the MIPS patch [2], not the
> > MicroBlaze patch [3]. What is the reason for that? If it's only the
> > lack of an ack, here's mine for the MIPS version:
>
> There was no reason other that the missing acks.
This series got held up one release cycle for build failure on powerpc,
so we trimmed it down to the essentials that we needed and could confirm
didn't break anything. Hence dropping mips and microblaze portions.
> > Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> Jason - is it possible/best to take this through your tree?
All the other bits will be in v3.11-rc1. It'd probably be best to go
ahead and take it through the linux-mips tree once -rc1 drops. We can
take it if you'd like but there really isn't any need to do so. Same
goes for the microblaze portion. Just rebase the patch onto -rc1 and
send to the appropriate maintainers.
hth,
Jason.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-05 17:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <BF39C5705592B0469C55326EC158C01A80307EBE26@GEORGE.Emea.Arm.com>
2013-07-05 13:29 ` of_pci_range_parser patch series Andrew Murray
2013-07-05 17:19 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-27 8:54 Ralf Baechle
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.