All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Cc: jeremy@goop.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove unused Kconfig parameter
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:20:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130710032056.GA14873@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382658288.20130710003458@eikelenboom.it>

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:34:58AM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Grub does this in it's update script to prevent adding a xen + kernel
> combination that has no chance of booting when dom0 support has not
> been configured in the kernel. That doesn't seem to be a unreasonable
> thought.

Actually, I don't see the problem - if there's no such support, then the
boot fails - plain and simple. That's like not building in or adding
into the initrd, support for your root filesystem - it is your own damn
fault. It is not the bootloader's job to sanity check whether your
kernel boots or not.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	jeremy@goop.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove unused Kconfig parameter
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:20:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130710032056.GA14873@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382658288.20130710003458@eikelenboom.it>

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:34:58AM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Grub does this in it's update script to prevent adding a xen + kernel
> combination that has no chance of booting when dom0 support has not
> been configured in the kernel. That doesn't seem to be a unreasonable
> thought.

Actually, I don't see the problem - if there's no such support, then the
boot fails - plain and simple. That's like not building in or adding
into the initrd, support for your root filesystem - it is your own damn
fault. It is not the bootloader's job to sanity check whether your
kernel boots or not.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-10  3:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-08  6:28 [PATCH] xen: remove unused Kconfig parameter Michael Opdenacker
2013-07-08 19:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-08 19:28   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-08 19:34   ` [Xen-devel] " Matt Wilson
2013-07-08 19:34   ` Matt Wilson
2013-07-08 19:34     ` Matt Wilson
2013-07-08 20:29     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-08 20:29       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-08 20:58       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-08 23:35         ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-08 23:35         ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-09  0:26           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09  0:26             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09  7:41             ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-09  7:41               ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-09 14:48               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 14:48                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 14:54                 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-09 14:54                   ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-09 15:05                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-09 15:05                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-09 15:09                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-09 15:09                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-09 17:19                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 17:19                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 20:01                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-09 20:01                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-09 20:40                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 20:40                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 20:57                         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-09 20:57                           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-09 22:34                   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-07-09 22:34                     ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-07-10  3:20                     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2013-07-10  3:20                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-10  3:55                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-10  3:55                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-10  6:19                     ` Matt Wilson
2013-07-10  6:19                       ` Matt Wilson
2013-07-10  7:41                       ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-07-10  7:41                         ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-07-10 14:46                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-10 14:46                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 22:34                   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-07-11 10:08             ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-11 10:08               ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-11 17:57               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-11 17:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-11 18:13                 ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-11 18:13                   ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-11 18:24                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-11 18:24                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-11 21:13                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-07-11 21:13                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-07-08 20:58       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-08 20:13   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-08 20:13     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130710032056.GA14873@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
    --cc=michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=msw@amazon.com \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.