All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: jeremy@goop.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove unused Kconfig parameter
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:57:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DEF1F3.2020900@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373537338.9708.18.camel@x61.thuisdomein>

On 07/11/2013 03:08 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 20:26 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> Could you explain to me please why the check in the scripts is
>> superfluous?
> 
> The discussion has since moved on a bit, but I haven't answered this
> question yet.
> 
> The check grub2 currently performs in one of its configuration scripts
> is (reformatted):
>     if (grep -qx "CONFIG_XEN_DOM0=y" "${config}" 2> /dev/null ||
>         grep -qx "CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST=y" "${config}" 2> /dev/null);
>     then echo -n "$i " ;
>     fi
> 

If only grep supported looking for more than one string at a time.
Maybe we could construct some kind of pattern expression syntax for it,
perhaps based on the theory of regular languages?

> But the Kconfig entry for XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST reads: 
>     # Dummy symbol since people have come to rely on the PRIVILEGED_GUEST
>     # name in tools.
>     config XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST
>             def_bool XEN_DOM0
> 
> In other words: CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST should always be equal to
> CONFIG_XEN_DOM0. So the two grep commands should always both evaluate to
> true or both evaluate to false. One of these two commands can safely be
> dropped.

Not necessarily true across kernel versions.

> Another consequence is that dropping XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST doesn't break
> this configuration script. It will still behave as it does now.
> 
> (Whether that script should grep for Kconfig macros in the first place
> is another discussion.)

"Hell no".

	-hpa

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>,
	Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>,
	jeremy@goop.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove unused Kconfig parameter
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:57:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DEF1F3.2020900@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373537338.9708.18.camel@x61.thuisdomein>

On 07/11/2013 03:08 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 20:26 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> Could you explain to me please why the check in the scripts is
>> superfluous?
> 
> The discussion has since moved on a bit, but I haven't answered this
> question yet.
> 
> The check grub2 currently performs in one of its configuration scripts
> is (reformatted):
>     if (grep -qx "CONFIG_XEN_DOM0=y" "${config}" 2> /dev/null ||
>         grep -qx "CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST=y" "${config}" 2> /dev/null);
>     then echo -n "$i " ;
>     fi
> 

If only grep supported looking for more than one string at a time.
Maybe we could construct some kind of pattern expression syntax for it,
perhaps based on the theory of regular languages?

> But the Kconfig entry for XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST reads: 
>     # Dummy symbol since people have come to rely on the PRIVILEGED_GUEST
>     # name in tools.
>     config XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST
>             def_bool XEN_DOM0
> 
> In other words: CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST should always be equal to
> CONFIG_XEN_DOM0. So the two grep commands should always both evaluate to
> true or both evaluate to false. One of these two commands can safely be
> dropped.

Not necessarily true across kernel versions.

> Another consequence is that dropping XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST doesn't break
> this configuration script. It will still behave as it does now.
> 
> (Whether that script should grep for Kconfig macros in the first place
> is another discussion.)

"Hell no".

	-hpa


  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-11 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-08  6:28 [PATCH] xen: remove unused Kconfig parameter Michael Opdenacker
2013-07-08 19:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-08 19:28   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-08 19:34   ` [Xen-devel] " Matt Wilson
2013-07-08 19:34   ` Matt Wilson
2013-07-08 19:34     ` Matt Wilson
2013-07-08 20:29     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-08 20:29       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-08 20:58       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-08 20:58       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-08 23:35         ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-09  0:26           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09  0:26             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09  7:41             ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-09  7:41               ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-09 14:48               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 14:48                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 14:54                 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-09 14:54                   ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-09 15:05                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-09 15:05                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-09 15:09                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-09 15:09                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-09 17:19                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 17:19                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 20:01                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-09 20:01                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-09 20:40                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 20:40                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 20:57                         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-09 20:57                           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-09 22:34                   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-07-09 22:34                   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-07-09 22:34                     ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-07-10  3:20                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-10  3:20                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-10  3:55                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-10  3:55                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-10  6:19                     ` Matt Wilson
2013-07-10  6:19                       ` Matt Wilson
2013-07-10  7:41                       ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-07-10  7:41                         ` Sander Eikelenboom
2013-07-10 14:46                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-10 14:46                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-11 10:08             ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-11 10:08               ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-11 17:57               ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-07-11 17:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-11 18:13                 ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-11 18:13                   ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-11 18:24                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-11 18:24                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-11 21:13                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-07-11 21:13                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-07-08 23:35         ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-08 20:13   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-08 20:13     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51DEF1F3.2020900@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=msw@amazon.com \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.