[PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove unneeded forward declaration

[PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove unneeded forward declaration

[Ezequiel Garcia]

These forward declarations are no longer needed, and are probably
historical left-over.

Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
index 35c6b6d..10ea99a 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
@@ -4428,9 +4428,6 @@ static int mv_pci_device_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 #endif
 #endif
 
-static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev);
-static int mv_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev);
-
 static int __init mv_init(void)
 {
 	int rc = -ENODEV;
-- 
1.8.1.5

[PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove uneeded CONFIG_HAVE_CLK ifdefs

[Ezequiel Garcia]

If CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not selected, then all the clk API turn out
into stubs, so there's no need to have the ifdefs.
The only side-effect of this patch is the extra tiny kmalloc,
but that's not enough reason to have such ugly ifdefs all around
the code.

Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 14 --------------
 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
index 10ea99a..3519987 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
@@ -553,10 +553,8 @@ struct mv_host_priv {
 	u32			irq_mask_offset;
 	u32			unmask_all_irqs;
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
 	struct clk		*clk;
 	struct clk              **port_clks;
-#endif
 	/*
 	 * These consistent DMA memory pools give us guaranteed
 	 * alignment for hardware-accessed data structures,
@@ -4032,9 +4030,7 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct resource *res;
 	int n_ports = 0, irq = 0;
 	int rc;
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
 	int port;
-#endif
 
 	ata_print_version_once(&pdev->dev, DRV_VERSION);
 
@@ -4068,13 +4064,11 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	if (!host || !hpriv)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
 	hpriv->port_clks = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
 					sizeof(struct clk *) * n_ports,
 					GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!hpriv->port_clks)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-#endif
 	host->private_data = hpriv;
 	hpriv->n_ports = n_ports;
 	hpriv->board_idx = chip_soc;
@@ -4084,7 +4078,6 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 				   resource_size(res));
 	hpriv->base -= SATAHC0_REG_BASE;
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
 	hpriv->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
 	if (IS_ERR(hpriv->clk))
 		dev_notice(&pdev->dev, "cannot get optional clkdev\n");
@@ -4098,7 +4091,6 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->port_clks[port]))
 			clk_prepare_enable(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
 	}
-#endif
 
 	/*
 	 * (Re-)program MBUS remapping windows if we are asked to.
@@ -4124,7 +4116,6 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return 0;
 
 err:
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
 	if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->clk)) {
 		clk_disable_unprepare(hpriv->clk);
 		clk_put(hpriv->clk);
@@ -4135,7 +4126,6 @@ err:
 			clk_put(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
 		}
 	}
-#endif
 
 	return rc;
 }
@@ -4151,13 +4141,10 @@ err:
 static int mv_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct ata_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
 	struct mv_host_priv *hpriv = host->private_data;
 	int port;
-#endif
 	ata_host_detach(host);
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
 	if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->clk)) {
 		clk_disable_unprepare(hpriv->clk);
 		clk_put(hpriv->clk);
@@ -4168,7 +4155,6 @@ static int mv_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			clk_put(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
 		}
 	}
-#endif
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.1.5

Re: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove unneeded forward declaration

[Tejun Heo]

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21:21PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> These forward declarations are no longer needed, and are probably
> historical left-over.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>

Applied to libata/for-3.12.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Re: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove uneeded CONFIG_HAVE_CLK ifdefs

[Tejun Heo]

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21:22PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> If CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not selected, then all the clk API turn out
> into stubs, so there's no need to have the ifdefs.
> The only side-effect of this patch is the extra tiny kmalloc,
> but that's not enough reason to have such ugly ifdefs all around
> the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>

Can you please add a comment in the hpriv definition explaining what
that clk is for and how it's optional and becomes noops when not
needed?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Re: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove uneeded CONFIG_HAVE_CLK ifdefs

[Ezequiel Garcia]

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:00:16PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21:22PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > If CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not selected, then all the clk API turn out
> > into stubs, so there's no need to have the ifdefs.
> > The only side-effect of this patch is the extra tiny kmalloc,
> > but that's not enough reason to have such ugly ifdefs all around
> > the code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> 
> Can you please add a comment in the hpriv definition explaining what
> that clk is for and how it's optional and becomes noops when not
> needed?
> 

Sure.

Thanks for the feedback,
-- 
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove uneeded CONFIG_HAVE_CLK ifdefs

[Andrew Lunn]

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21:22PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> If CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not selected, then all the clk API turn out
> into stubs, so there's no need to have the ifdefs.
> The only side-effect of this patch is the extra tiny kmalloc,
> but that's not enough reason to have such ugly ifdefs all around
> the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>

Hi Ezequiel

What architectures did you compile this for? PowerPC and x86 as well
as ARM? I _think_ this driver is also used there, and i _think_
without some #ifdef, it failed to build. But maybe since then, the
common clock is now available on all architectures?

       Andrew


> ---
>  drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 14 --------------
>  1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
> index 10ea99a..3519987 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
> @@ -553,10 +553,8 @@ struct mv_host_priv {
>  	u32			irq_mask_offset;
>  	u32			unmask_all_irqs;
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
>  	struct clk		*clk;
>  	struct clk              **port_clks;
> -#endif
>  	/*
>  	 * These consistent DMA memory pools give us guaranteed
>  	 * alignment for hardware-accessed data structures,
> @@ -4032,9 +4030,7 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct resource *res;
>  	int n_ports = 0, irq = 0;
>  	int rc;
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
>  	int port;
> -#endif
>  
>  	ata_print_version_once(&pdev->dev, DRV_VERSION);
>  
> @@ -4068,13 +4064,11 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	if (!host || !hpriv)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
>  	hpriv->port_clks = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>  					sizeof(struct clk *) * n_ports,
>  					GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!hpriv->port_clks)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> -#endif
>  	host->private_data = hpriv;
>  	hpriv->n_ports = n_ports;
>  	hpriv->board_idx = chip_soc;
> @@ -4084,7 +4078,6 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  				   resource_size(res));
>  	hpriv->base -= SATAHC0_REG_BASE;
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
>  	hpriv->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>  	if (IS_ERR(hpriv->clk))
>  		dev_notice(&pdev->dev, "cannot get optional clkdev\n");
> @@ -4098,7 +4091,6 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->port_clks[port]))
>  			clk_prepare_enable(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
>  	}
> -#endif
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * (Re-)program MBUS remapping windows if we are asked to.
> @@ -4124,7 +4116,6 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  err:
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
>  	if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->clk)) {
>  		clk_disable_unprepare(hpriv->clk);
>  		clk_put(hpriv->clk);
> @@ -4135,7 +4126,6 @@ err:
>  			clk_put(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
>  		}
>  	}
> -#endif
>  
>  	return rc;
>  }
> @@ -4151,13 +4141,10 @@ err:
>  static int mv_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct ata_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
>  	struct mv_host_priv *hpriv = host->private_data;
>  	int port;
> -#endif
>  	ata_host_detach(host);
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)
>  	if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->clk)) {
>  		clk_disable_unprepare(hpriv->clk);
>  		clk_put(hpriv->clk);
> @@ -4168,7 +4155,6 @@ static int mv_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			clk_put(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
>  		}
>  	}
> -#endif
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.1.5
> 

Re: [PATCH] ATA: sata_mv: Remove uneeded CONFIG_HAVE_CLK ifdefs

[Ezequiel Garcia]

Hi Andrew,

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 09:04:31PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21:22PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > If CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not selected, then all the clk API turn out
> > into stubs, so there's no need to have the ifdefs.
> > The only side-effect of this patch is the extra tiny kmalloc,
> > but that's not enough reason to have such ugly ifdefs all around
> > the code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> 
> What architectures did you compile this for? PowerPC and x86 as well
> as ARM? I _think_ this driver is also used there, and i _think_
> without some #ifdef, it failed to build. But maybe since then, the
> common clock is now available on all architectures?
> 

Using COMPILE_TEST=y, I've compiled with a working ARM config,
as well as with a MMU-less ARM (with COMMON_CLK=n).

And now that you mention x86, I've compiled it with an x86 config
(with COMMON_CLK=n).

I'm not sure this particular change is architecture dependent (at least
nowadays), since by looking at include/linux/clk.h it seems pretty
straightforward that all the operations are no-ops if HAVE_CLK=n.

Am I missing something?
-- 
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com