From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Fix r7/r11 confusion when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y [OT]
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:44:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130730094457.GC2478@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130730113853.46cbb00a@armhf>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:38:53AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:25:18 +0100
> Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> wrote:
>
> > The pragmatic route is less contraversial and lower overhead: even though
> > it's not correct as per the ABI, GCC is the only supported compiler for
> > building the kernel anyway.
>
> BTW, kernels compiled with gcc-4.8 don't work.
I haven't tried 4.8 yet. Do you know what the problem is?
> Did anybody succeed with clang?
Hmm, I've no idea. Is this possible?
Cheers
---Dave
>
> --
> Ken ar c'henta? | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
> Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Jed Davis <jld@mozilla.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"oprofile-list@lists.sf.net" <oprofile-list@lists.sf.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix r7/r11 confusion when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y [OT]
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:44:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130730094457.GC2478@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130730113853.46cbb00a@armhf>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:38:53AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:25:18 +0100
> Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> wrote:
>
> > The pragmatic route is less contraversial and lower overhead: even though
> > it's not correct as per the ABI, GCC is the only supported compiler for
> > building the kernel anyway.
>
> BTW, kernels compiled with gcc-4.8 don't work.
I haven't tried 4.8 yet. Do you know what the problem is?
> Did anybody succeed with clang?
Hmm, I've no idea. Is this possible?
Cheers
---Dave
>
> --
> Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
> Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-30 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-13 3:18 [PATCH] ARM: Fix r7/r11 confusion when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y Jed Davis
2013-07-13 3:18 ` Jed Davis
2013-07-15 13:54 ` Will Deacon
2013-07-15 13:54 ` Will Deacon
2013-07-20 4:46 ` Jed Davis
2013-07-20 4:46 ` Jed Davis
2013-07-21 21:37 ` Will Deacon
2013-07-21 21:37 ` Will Deacon
2013-07-22 13:56 ` Robert Richter
2013-07-22 13:56 ` Robert Richter
2013-07-22 18:52 ` Dave Martin
2013-07-22 18:52 ` Dave Martin
2013-07-29 21:21 ` Jed Davis
2013-07-29 21:21 ` Jed Davis
2013-07-30 9:25 ` Dave Martin
2013-07-30 9:25 ` Dave Martin
2013-07-30 9:38 ` [PATCH] ARM: Fix r7/r11 confusion when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y [OT] Jean-Francois Moine
2013-07-30 9:38 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-07-30 9:44 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2013-07-30 9:44 ` Dave Martin
2013-07-30 10:09 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-07-30 10:09 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-07-30 11:46 ` Dave Martin
2013-07-30 11:46 ` Dave Martin
2013-07-30 17:50 ` Christopher Covington
2013-07-30 17:50 ` Christopher Covington
2013-07-30 9:49 ` Will Deacon
2013-07-30 9:49 ` Will Deacon
2013-07-31 9:03 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-07-31 9:03 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2013-07-31 10:38 ` Will Deacon
2013-07-31 10:38 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-06 9:54 ` walimis
2014-01-06 9:54 ` walimis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130730094457.GC2478@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.