Re: should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>]

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:21:12AM -0400, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
> >
> > .
> >
> >   anyway, as i said, masking out recipes-graphics was a stopgap
> > measure, but i'd rather do this the "right" way, if someone wants to
> > explain what the "right" way is.
> >
> > rday
> >
> 
> I don't know.  I first renamed mesa_9.1.5.bbappend to messa_9.1.6.bbappend
> and that worked to continue my build but like I said I ran into other
> issues ... if you look back a few days you can see where I posted about
> that.  What worked for me was a clean checkout of the branches.  YMMV I
> guess :)

So, both of you went back and forth for couple days, generating dozens of 
emails, but nobody offered a trivial rename patch to fix it... :)

Anyway, it's fixed now - I just wasn't paying attention to the master for the 
past few days and didn't have time to take care of it right away.

The problem with mesa is that it now gets bumped to every minor version on 
almost a weekly basis and sometimes I just miss the fact that it broke 
meta-ti/master due to the bbappend we have. I need to try to push that change 
we carry to oe-core so we wouldn't need a bbappend...

-- 
Denys