should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Robert P. J. Day]

  trying to build for beaglebone, getting:

ERROR: No recipes available for:
/home/rpjday/oe/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa_9.1.5.bbappend
ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1

should meta-ti master stay in sync with oe-core master (which has a
recipe for 9.1.6), or is there a different combo of layers to use?
thanks.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

Re: should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Brian Hutchinson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 990 bytes --]

On Aug 9, 2013 7:23 PM, "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>
>
>   trying to build for beaglebone, getting:
>
> ERROR: No recipes available for:
>
/home/rpjday/oe/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa_9.1.5.bbappend
> ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1
>
> should meta-ti master stay in sync with oe-core master (which has a
> recipe for 9.1.6), or is there a different combo of layers to use?
> thanks.
>
> rday
>

Hi Robert,

I ran into the same thing the other day.  Yes, yocto master should be used
with meta-ti master as far as I know.  I've ran into trouble mixing branch
layers before.

My problem happened after I did a git pull on everything.  I also had other
problems besides the one you mentioned.  I suspect the update messed
something up as I did another checkout of yocto master and meta-ti master
and had a clean build.  Makes me suspect something in the git pull that
hosed something up.

Regards,

Brian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1244 bytes --]

Re: should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Brian Hutchinson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1356 bytes --]

On Aug 9, 2013 8:22 PM, "Brian Hutchinson" <b.hutchman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 9, 2013 7:23 PM, "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >
> >
> >   trying to build for beaglebone, getting:
> >
> > ERROR: No recipes available for:
> >
/home/rpjday/oe/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa_9.1.5.bbappend
> > ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1
> >
> > should meta-ti master stay in sync with oe-core master (which has a
> > recipe for 9.1.6), or is there a different combo of layers to use?
> > thanks.
> >
> > rday
> >
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> I ran into the same thing the other day.  Yes, yocto master should be
used with meta-ti master as far as I know.  I've ran into trouble mixing
branch layers before.
>
> My problem happened after I did a git pull on everything.  I also had
other problems besides the one you mentioned.  I suspect the update messed
something up as I did another checkout of yocto master and meta-ti master
and had a clean build.  Makes me suspect something in the git pull that
hosed something up.
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian

As a stop gap measure, I did just rename the bbappend to 9.1.6 and that
solved my mesa problem but then I had toolchain build problems.  When I did
a fresh checkout, I did not get the mesa error for the mesa 9.1.5.

Regards,

Brian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1777 bytes --]

Re: should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Robert P. J. Day]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1238 bytes --]

On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Brian Hutchinson wrote:

... snip ...

> As a stop gap measure, I did just rename the bbappend to 9.1.6 and
> that solved my mesa problem but then I had toolchain build
> problems.  When I did a fresh checkout, I did not get the mesa error
> for the mesa 9.1.5.

  for now, since i'm building a non-graphical "core-image-minimal"
image, i just masked out the entire "meta-ti/recipes-graphics"
directory, but i'm sure that's not the cleanest way to solve this. :-)

  so what is the underlying layer with which meta-ti should stay in
sync? it seems both poky and oe-core have moved on to mesa_9.1.6,
while meta-ti is still at 9.1.5_bbappend, at least on "master". so
i'm assuming synchronization requires using tags, or a particular
branch, or something like that.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

Re: should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Brian Hutchinson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1159 bytes --]

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>wrote:

> On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
>
> ... snip ...
>
> > As a stop gap measure, I did just rename the bbappend to 9.1.6 and
> > that solved my mesa problem but then I had toolchain build
> > problems.  When I did a fresh checkout, I did not get the mesa error
> > for the mesa 9.1.5.
>
>   for now, since i'm building a non-graphical "core-image-minimal"
> image, i just masked out the entire "meta-ti/recipes-graphics"
> directory, but i'm sure that's not the cleanest way to solve this. :-)
>
>   so what is the underlying layer with which meta-ti should stay in
> sync? it seems both poky and oe-core have moved on to mesa_9.1.6,
> while meta-ti is still at 9.1.5_bbappend, at least on "master". so
> i'm assuming synchronization requires using tags, or a particular
> branch, or something like that.
>
>
I don't know.  My image is based off core-image-minimal and I don't need
graphics so I didn't look into it anymore when the fresh checkout of poky
master and meta-ti master worked (I also use meta-openembedded).

Regards,

Brian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1678 bytes --]

Re: should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Robert P. J. Day]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2133 bytes --]

On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Brian Hutchinson wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>       On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
>
> ... snip ...
>
> > As a stop gap measure, I did just rename the bbappend to 9.1.6 and
> > that solved my mesa problem but then I had toolchain build
> > problems.  When I did a fresh checkout, I did not get the mesa error
> > for the mesa 9.1.5.
>
>   for now, since i'm building a non-graphical "core-image-minimal"
> image, i just masked out the entire "meta-ti/recipes-graphics"
> directory, but i'm sure that's not the cleanest way to solve this. :-)
>
>   so what is the underlying layer with which meta-ti should stay in
> sync? it seems both poky and oe-core have moved on to mesa_9.1.6,
> while meta-ti is still at 9.1.5_bbappend, at least on "master". so
> i'm assuming synchronization requires using tags, or a particular
> branch, or something like that.
>
> I don't know.  My image is based off core-image-minimal and I don't
> need graphics so I didn't look into it anymore when the fresh
> checkout of poky master and meta-ti master worked (I also use
> meta-openembedded).

  not trying to beat this to death (too late!) but i don't see how
that can work, since poky master has a recipe for mesa_9.1.6, and
meta-ti has a bbappend for mesa_9.1.5, which is exactly what got me
into trouble in the first place. unless i'm misreading something, i'm
using fully up-to-date master branches for both.

  anyway, as i said, masking out recipes-graphics was a stopgap
measure, but i'd rather do this the "right" way, if someone wants to
explain what the "right" way is.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

Re: should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Brian Hutchinson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 526 bytes --]

>
> .
>
>   anyway, as i said, masking out recipes-graphics was a stopgap
> measure, but i'd rather do this the "right" way, if someone wants to
> explain what the "right" way is.
>
> rday
>

I don't know.  I first renamed mesa_9.1.5.bbappend to messa_9.1.6.bbappend
and that worked to continue my build but like I said I ran into other
issues ... if you look back a few days you can see where I posted about
that.  What worked for me was a clean checkout of the branches.  YMMV I
guess :)

Regards,

Brian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 980 bytes --]

Re: should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:21:12AM -0400, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
> >
> > .
> >
> >   anyway, as i said, masking out recipes-graphics was a stopgap
> > measure, but i'd rather do this the "right" way, if someone wants to
> > explain what the "right" way is.
> >
> > rday
> >
> 
> I don't know.  I first renamed mesa_9.1.5.bbappend to messa_9.1.6.bbappend
> and that worked to continue my build but like I said I ran into other
> issues ... if you look back a few days you can see where I posted about
> that.  What worked for me was a clean checkout of the branches.  YMMV I
> guess :)

So, both of you went back and forth for couple days, generating dozens of 
emails, but nobody offered a trivial rename patch to fix it... :)

Anyway, it's fixed now - I just wasn't paying attention to the master for the 
past few days and didn't have time to take care of it right away.

The problem with mesa is that it now gets bumped to every minor version on 
almost a weekly basis and sometimes I just miss the fact that it broke 
meta-ti/master due to the bbappend we have. I need to try to push that change 
we carry to oe-core so we wouldn't need a bbappend...

-- 
Denys

Re: should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Brian Hutchinson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1385 bytes --]

On Aug 10, 2013 1:30 PM, "Denys Dmytriyenko" <denys@ti.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:21:12AM -0400, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >   anyway, as i said, masking out recipes-graphics was a stopgap
> > > measure, but i'd rather do this the "right" way, if someone wants to
> > > explain what the "right" way is.
> > >
> > > rday
> > >
> >
> > I don't know.  I first renamed mesa_9.1.5.bbappend to
messa_9.1.6.bbappend
> > and that worked to continue my build but like I said I ran into other
> > issues ... if you look back a few days you can see where I posted about
> > that.  What worked for me was a clean checkout of the branches.  YMMV I
> > guess :)
>
> So, both of you went back and forth for couple days, generating dozens of
> emails, but nobody offered a trivial rename patch to fix it... :)
>
> Anyway, it's fixed now - I just wasn't paying attention to the master for
the
> past few days and didn't have time to take care of it right away.
>
> The problem with mesa is that it now gets bumped to every minor version on
> almost a weekly basis and sometimes I just miss the fact that it broke
> meta-ti/master due to the bbappend we have. I need to try to push that
change
> we carry to oe-core so we wouldn't need a bbappend...
>
> --
> Denys

Sorry.  I wasn't 100% sure what I did was the right fix.

B

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1822 bytes --]

Re: should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Robert P. J. Day]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1375 bytes --]

On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Brian Hutchinson wrote:

>
>
> On Aug 9, 2013 7:23 PM, "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >
> >
> >   trying to build for beaglebone, getting:
> >
> > ERROR: No recipes available for:
> > /home/rpjday/oe/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa_9.1.5.bbappend
> > ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1
> >
> > should meta-ti master stay in sync with oe-core master (which has a
> > recipe for 9.1.6), or is there a different combo of layers to use?
> > thanks.
> >
> > rday
> >
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> I ran into the same thing the other day.  Yes, yocto master should
> be used with meta-ti master as far as I know.  I've ran into trouble
> mixing branch layers before.

  i'm not sure what you mean by "yocto master". i'm aware of the
meta-yocto layer, but that doesn't supply the underlying recipes. did
you mean "poky master"? or am i missing something here?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

Re: should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Brian Hutchinson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1163 bytes --]

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>wrote:

> On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Aug 9, 2013 7:23 PM, "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >   trying to build for beaglebone, getting:
> > >
> > > ERROR: No recipes available for:
> > >
> /home/rpjday/oe/dist/layers/meta-ti/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa_9.1.5.bbappend
> > > ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1
> > >
> > > should meta-ti master stay in sync with oe-core master (which has a
> > > recipe for 9.1.6), or is there a different combo of layers to use?
> > > thanks.
> > >
> > > rday
> > >
> >
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > I ran into the same thing the other day.  Yes, yocto master should
> > be used with meta-ti master as far as I know.  I've ran into trouble
> > mixing branch layers before.
>
>   i'm not sure what you mean by "yocto master". i'm aware of the
> meta-yocto layer, but that doesn't supply the underlying recipes. did
> you mean "poky master"? or am i missing something here?
>
>
Sorry, just meant the master branch of the layers.

Regards,

Brian

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1798 bytes --]