From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: dove: DT PCIe support
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:16:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130815181651.2f336cff@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376396724-32048-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth,
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:25:19 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> This patch set adds support for the PCIe controllers found on Marvell
> Dove SoCs. It depends on mvebu-pci patches sent by Thomas Petazzoni.
> The ARM Dove related patches have already been taken by Jason Cooper
> and have been removed from v2 of this patch set. Changelog is added
> to the individual patch emails.
>
> Patches 1 and 2 fix some minor issues with pci-mvebu by moving
> clk_prepare_enable before accessing any controller registers and
> counting sucessfully registered ports only.
>
> Patch 3 converts pci-mvebu from subsys_initcall registration to
> normal platform driver registration to allow it to fail with
> EPROBE_DEFER later.
>
> Patch 4 adds DT parsing for reset (PERST#) GPIO pins and delay to
> wait for PCIe devices after reset de-assertion.
>
> Patch 5 finally adds a compatible to pci-mvebu for Dove SoCs.
>
> [Patch 6-9 have already been taken by Jason Cooper]
>
> Sebastian Hesselbarth (5):
> PCI: mvebu: move clock enable before register access
> PCI: mvebu: increment nports only for registered ports
> PCI: mvebu: remove subsys_initcall
> PCI: mvebu: add support for reset on GPIO
> PCI: mvebu: add support for Marvell Dove SoCs
I've just seen that Jason Cooper has already sent the PR for this code,
but anyway, I just tested mvebu/for-next on my Armada XP GP board, and
the PCIe + MSI continues to work nicely, even with your code
integrated. So:
Tested-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: dove: DT PCIe support
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:16:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130815181651.2f336cff@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376396724-32048-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth,
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:25:19 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> This patch set adds support for the PCIe controllers found on Marvell
> Dove SoCs. It depends on mvebu-pci patches sent by Thomas Petazzoni.
> The ARM Dove related patches have already been taken by Jason Cooper
> and have been removed from v2 of this patch set. Changelog is added
> to the individual patch emails.
>
> Patches 1 and 2 fix some minor issues with pci-mvebu by moving
> clk_prepare_enable before accessing any controller registers and
> counting sucessfully registered ports only.
>
> Patch 3 converts pci-mvebu from subsys_initcall registration to
> normal platform driver registration to allow it to fail with
> EPROBE_DEFER later.
>
> Patch 4 adds DT parsing for reset (PERST#) GPIO pins and delay to
> wait for PCIe devices after reset de-assertion.
>
> Patch 5 finally adds a compatible to pci-mvebu for Dove SoCs.
>
> [Patch 6-9 have already been taken by Jason Cooper]
>
> Sebastian Hesselbarth (5):
> PCI: mvebu: move clock enable before register access
> PCI: mvebu: increment nports only for registered ports
> PCI: mvebu: remove subsys_initcall
> PCI: mvebu: add support for reset on GPIO
> PCI: mvebu: add support for Marvell Dove SoCs
I've just seen that Jason Cooper has already sent the PR for this code,
but anyway, I just tested mvebu/for-next on my Armada XP GP board, and
the PCIe + MSI continues to work nicely, even with your code
integrated. So:
Tested-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-15 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-13 12:25 [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: dove: DT PCIe support Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 12:25 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] PCI: mvebu: move clock enable before register access Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 12:25 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI: mvebu: increment nports only for registered ports Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 12:25 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] PCI: mvebu: remove subsys_initcall Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 12:25 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: mvebu: add support for reset on GPIO Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 12:25 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 20:29 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13 20:29 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13 21:26 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-13 21:26 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-14 9:07 ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-14 9:07 ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-14 9:25 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-14 9:25 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-14 11:53 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-14 11:53 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-13 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] PCI: mvebu: add support for Marvell Dove SoCs Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 12:25 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: dove: DT PCIe support Jason Cooper
2013-08-13 14:01 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-13 15:11 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-13 15:11 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-13 17:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-13 17:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-13 18:49 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-13 18:49 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-15 16:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-08-15 16:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130815181651.2f336cff@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.