All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] vhost: switch to use vhost_add_used_n()
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:56:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130816095655.GB21821@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376630190-5912-4-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:16:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Let vhost_add_used() to use vhost_add_used_n() to reduce the code duplication.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>

Does compiler inline it then?
Reason I ask, last time I checked put_user inside vhost_add_used
was much cheaper than copy_to_user inside vhost_add_used_n,
so I wouldn't be surprised if this hurt performance.
Did you check?

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.c |   43 ++-----------------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index e58cf00..c479452 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -1332,48 +1332,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_discard_vq_desc);
>   * want to notify the guest, using eventfd. */
>  int vhost_add_used(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head, int len)
>  {
> -	struct vring_used_elem __user *used;
> +	struct vring_used_elem heads = { head, len };
>  
> -	/* The virtqueue contains a ring of used buffers.  Get a pointer to the
> -	 * next entry in that used ring. */
> -	used = &vq->used->ring[vq->last_used_idx % vq->num];
> -	if (__put_user(head, &used->id)) {
> -		vq_err(vq, "Failed to write used id");
> -		return -EFAULT;
> -	}
> -	if (__put_user(len, &used->len)) {
> -		vq_err(vq, "Failed to write used len");
> -		return -EFAULT;
> -	}
> -	/* Make sure buffer is written before we update index. */
> -	smp_wmb();
> -	if (__put_user(vq->last_used_idx + 1, &vq->used->idx)) {
> -		vq_err(vq, "Failed to increment used idx");
> -		return -EFAULT;
> -	}
> -	if (unlikely(vq->log_used)) {
> -		/* Make sure data is seen before log. */
> -		smp_wmb();
> -		/* Log used ring entry write. */
> -		log_write(vq->log_base,
> -			  vq->log_addr +
> -			   ((void __user *)used - (void __user *)vq->used),
> -			  sizeof *used);
> -		/* Log used index update. */
> -		log_write(vq->log_base,
> -			  vq->log_addr + offsetof(struct vring_used, idx),
> -			  sizeof vq->used->idx);
> -		if (vq->log_ctx)
> -			eventfd_signal(vq->log_ctx, 1);
> -	}
> -	vq->last_used_idx++;
> -	/* If the driver never bothers to signal in a very long while,
> -	 * used index might wrap around. If that happens, invalidate
> -	 * signalled_used index we stored. TODO: make sure driver
> -	 * signals at least once in 2^16 and remove this. */
> -	if (unlikely(vq->last_used_idx == vq->signalled_used))
> -		vq->signalled_used_valid = false;
> -	return 0;
> +	return vhost_add_used_n(vq, &heads, 1);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_add_used);
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] vhost: switch to use vhost_add_used_n()
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:56:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130816095655.GB21821@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376630190-5912-4-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:16:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Let vhost_add_used() to use vhost_add_used_n() to reduce the code duplication.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>

Does compiler inline it then?
Reason I ask, last time I checked put_user inside vhost_add_used
was much cheaper than copy_to_user inside vhost_add_used_n,
so I wouldn't be surprised if this hurt performance.
Did you check?

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.c |   43 ++-----------------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index e58cf00..c479452 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -1332,48 +1332,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_discard_vq_desc);
>   * want to notify the guest, using eventfd. */
>  int vhost_add_used(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head, int len)
>  {
> -	struct vring_used_elem __user *used;
> +	struct vring_used_elem heads = { head, len };
>  
> -	/* The virtqueue contains a ring of used buffers.  Get a pointer to the
> -	 * next entry in that used ring. */
> -	used = &vq->used->ring[vq->last_used_idx % vq->num];
> -	if (__put_user(head, &used->id)) {
> -		vq_err(vq, "Failed to write used id");
> -		return -EFAULT;
> -	}
> -	if (__put_user(len, &used->len)) {
> -		vq_err(vq, "Failed to write used len");
> -		return -EFAULT;
> -	}
> -	/* Make sure buffer is written before we update index. */
> -	smp_wmb();
> -	if (__put_user(vq->last_used_idx + 1, &vq->used->idx)) {
> -		vq_err(vq, "Failed to increment used idx");
> -		return -EFAULT;
> -	}
> -	if (unlikely(vq->log_used)) {
> -		/* Make sure data is seen before log. */
> -		smp_wmb();
> -		/* Log used ring entry write. */
> -		log_write(vq->log_base,
> -			  vq->log_addr +
> -			   ((void __user *)used - (void __user *)vq->used),
> -			  sizeof *used);
> -		/* Log used index update. */
> -		log_write(vq->log_base,
> -			  vq->log_addr + offsetof(struct vring_used, idx),
> -			  sizeof vq->used->idx);
> -		if (vq->log_ctx)
> -			eventfd_signal(vq->log_ctx, 1);
> -	}
> -	vq->last_used_idx++;
> -	/* If the driver never bothers to signal in a very long while,
> -	 * used index might wrap around. If that happens, invalidate
> -	 * signalled_used index we stored. TODO: make sure driver
> -	 * signals at least once in 2^16 and remove this. */
> -	if (unlikely(vq->last_used_idx == vq->signalled_used))
> -		vq->signalled_used_valid = false;
> -	return 0;
> +	return vhost_add_used_n(vq, &heads, 1);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_add_used);
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.1

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-16  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-16  5:16 [PATCH 0/6] vhost code cleanup and minor enhancement Jason Wang
2013-08-16  5:16 ` Jason Wang
2013-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] vhost_net: make vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() returns void Jason Wang
2013-08-16  5:16   ` Jason Wang
2013-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() Jason Wang
2013-08-16  5:16   ` Jason Wang
2013-08-16  9:54   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-16  9:54     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-20  2:33     ` Jason Wang
2013-08-20  2:33       ` Jason Wang
2013-08-23  8:50       ` Jason Wang
2013-08-23  8:50         ` Jason Wang
2013-08-25 11:48         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-25 11:48           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] vhost: switch to use vhost_add_used_n() Jason Wang
2013-08-16  5:16   ` Jason Wang
2013-08-16  9:56   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-08-16  9:56     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-20  2:36     ` Jason Wang
2013-08-20  2:36       ` Jason Wang
2013-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] vhost_net: determine whether or not to use zerocopy at one time Jason Wang
2013-08-16  5:16   ` Jason Wang
2013-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] vhost_net: poll vhost queue after marking DMA is done Jason Wang
2013-08-16  5:16   ` Jason Wang
2013-08-16 10:00   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-16 10:00     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-20  2:44     ` Jason Wang
2013-08-20  2:44       ` Jason Wang
2013-08-16  5:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] vhost_net: remove the max pending check Jason Wang
2013-08-16  5:16   ` Jason Wang
2013-08-16 10:02   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-16 10:02     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-20  2:48     ` Jason Wang
2013-08-20  2:48       ` Jason Wang
2013-08-23  8:55       ` Jason Wang
2013-08-23  8:55         ` Jason Wang
2013-08-25 11:53         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-25 11:53           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-26  7:00           ` Jason Wang
2013-08-26  7:00             ` Jason Wang
2013-08-30  3:23           ` Jason Wang
2013-08-30  3:23             ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130816095655.GB21821@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.