All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Cc: swarren@wwwdotorg.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ian.campbell@citrix.com, grant.likely@linaro.org,
	rob.herring@calxeda.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, wni@nvidia.com,
	durgadoss.r@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/14] hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:39:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130823233936.GA14810@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377299755-5134-4-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com>

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:15:44PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> This patch adds to lm75 temperature sensor the possibility
> to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
> thermal framework.
> 
> The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
> describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
> inside the lm75 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
> will be the same.
> 
> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/lm75.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> index c03b490..dc55908 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>  #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
>  #include "lm75.h"
>  
>  
> @@ -70,6 +72,7 @@ static const u8 LM75_REG_TEMP[3] = {
>  /* Each client has this additional data */
>  struct lm75_data {
>  	struct device		*hwmon_dev;
> +	struct thermal_zone_device	*tz;
>  	struct mutex		update_lock;
>  	u8			orig_conf;
>  	u8			resolution;	/* In bits, between 9 and 12 */
> @@ -92,6 +95,19 @@ static struct lm75_data *lm75_update_device(struct device *dev);
>  
>  /* sysfs attributes for hwmon */
>  
> +static int lm75_read_temp(void *dev, unsigned long *temp)
> +{
> +	struct lm75_data *data = lm75_update_device(dev);
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(data))
> +		return PTR_ERR(data);
> +
> +	*temp = ((data->temp[0] >> (16 - data->resolution)) * 1000) >>
> +			(data->resolution - 8);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *da,
>  			 char *buf)
>  {
> @@ -271,11 +287,25 @@ lm75_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  		goto exit_remove;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (of_find_property(client->dev.of_node, "monitored-zones", NULL)) {
> +		data->tz = thermal_zone_of_device_register(&client->dev,
> +							   0,
> +							   false, /* -hwmon */
> +							   &client->dev,
> +							   lm75_read_temp);
> +		if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
> +			status = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
> +			goto exit_hwmon;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
I don't think it should be fatal if thermal_zone_of_device_register fails.
hwmon itself still works fine, and should not be penaltized for a thermal
subsystem failure. Better display a warning if that happens and don't bail out.

The same comment applies to all patches affecting the hwmon subsystem.

>  	dev_info(&client->dev, "%s: sensor '%s'\n",
>  		 dev_name(data->hwmon_dev), client->name);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> +exit_hwmon:
> +	hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
>  exit_remove:
>  	sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm75_group);
>  	return status;
> @@ -285,6 +315,7 @@ static int lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  {
>  	struct lm75_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>  
> +	thermal_zone_device_unregister(data->tz);
>  	hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
>  	sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm75_group);
>  	lm75_write_value(client, LM75_REG_CONF, data->orig_conf);
> -- 
> 1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d
> 
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Cc: swarren@wwwdotorg.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ian.campbell@citrix.com, grant.likely@linaro.org,
	rob.herring@calxeda.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, wni@nvidia.com,
	durgadoss.r@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH 03/14] hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 23:39:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130823233936.GA14810@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377299755-5134-4-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com>

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:15:44PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> This patch adds to lm75 temperature sensor the possibility
> to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
> thermal framework.
> 
> The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
> describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
> inside the lm75 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
> will be the same.
> 
> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/lm75.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> index c03b490..dc55908 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>  #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
>  #include "lm75.h"
>  
>  
> @@ -70,6 +72,7 @@ static const u8 LM75_REG_TEMP[3] = {
>  /* Each client has this additional data */
>  struct lm75_data {
>  	struct device		*hwmon_dev;
> +	struct thermal_zone_device	*tz;
>  	struct mutex		update_lock;
>  	u8			orig_conf;
>  	u8			resolution;	/* In bits, between 9 and 12 */
> @@ -92,6 +95,19 @@ static struct lm75_data *lm75_update_device(struct device *dev);
>  
>  /* sysfs attributes for hwmon */
>  
> +static int lm75_read_temp(void *dev, unsigned long *temp)
> +{
> +	struct lm75_data *data = lm75_update_device(dev);
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(data))
> +		return PTR_ERR(data);
> +
> +	*temp = ((data->temp[0] >> (16 - data->resolution)) * 1000) >>
> +			(data->resolution - 8);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *da,
>  			 char *buf)
>  {
> @@ -271,11 +287,25 @@ lm75_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  		goto exit_remove;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (of_find_property(client->dev.of_node, "monitored-zones", NULL)) {
> +		data->tz = thermal_zone_of_device_register(&client->dev,
> +							   0,
> +							   false, /* -hwmon */
> +							   &client->dev,
> +							   lm75_read_temp);
> +		if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
> +			status = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
> +			goto exit_hwmon;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
I don't think it should be fatal if thermal_zone_of_device_register fails.
hwmon itself still works fine, and should not be penaltized for a thermal
subsystem failure. Better display a warning if that happens and don't bail out.

The same comment applies to all patches affecting the hwmon subsystem.

>  	dev_info(&client->dev, "%s: sensor '%s'\n",
>  		 dev_name(data->hwmon_dev), client->name);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> +exit_hwmon:
> +	hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
>  exit_remove:
>  	sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm75_group);
>  	return status;
> @@ -285,6 +315,7 @@ static int lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  {
>  	struct lm75_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>  
> +	thermal_zone_device_unregister(data->tz);
>  	hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
>  	sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm75_group);
>  	lm75_write_value(client, LM75_REG_CONF, data->orig_conf);
> -- 
> 1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-23 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-23 23:15 [RFC PATCH 00/14] RFCv2: device thermal limits represented in device tree nodes Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 01/14] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: add dt node parsing for 'cooling-zones' Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26  4:42   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-26  4:54     ` [lm-sensors] " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-26 12:13     ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 12:13       ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 12:13       ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27  9:29   ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27  9:29     ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 13:05     ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 13:05       ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 13:05       ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 13:05       ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 10:22   ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 10:22     ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 13:44     ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 13:44       ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 16:23       ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 16:23         ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 18:17         ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 18:17           ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-29 23:19           ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-29 23:19             ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-02  8:14             ` Wei Ni
2013-09-02  8:14               ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
2013-09-02 16:28             ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-02 16:28               ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-03 13:15             ` Mark Rutland
2013-09-03 13:15               ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Rutland
2013-09-03 17:12               ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-03 17:12                 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-07  0:19               ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-07  0:19                 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 03/14] hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:39   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-08-23 23:39     ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-26 12:11     ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 12:11       ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 12:11       ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:50   ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-23 23:50     ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-08-26 12:15     ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 12:15       ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 12:15       ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 10:26   ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 10:26     ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Rutland
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 04/14] hwmon: tmp102: " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 10:27   ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 10:27     ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Rutland
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: use thermal DT infrastructure Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 06/14] arm: dts: add omap4 CPU thermal data Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 07/14] arm: dts: add omap4430 " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] arm: dts: add omap4460 " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 09/14] arm: dts: point to cooling-zones on omap4430 cpu node Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 10/14] arm: dts: point to cooling-zones on omap4460 " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 11/14] arm: dts: add omap5 GPU thermal data Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 12/14] arm: dts: add omap5 CORE " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 13/14] arm: dts: add omap5 " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 14/14] arm: dts: point to cooling-zones on omap5 cpu node Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130823233936.GA14810@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=durgadoss.r@intel.com \
    --cc=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=wni@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.