From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>,
swarren@wwwdotorg.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ian.campbell@citrix.com, grant.likely@linaro.org,
rob.herring@calxeda.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, wni@nvidia.com,
durgadoss.r@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/14] hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:15:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521B46F4.7080507@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130823235049.GB14810@roeck-us.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3894 bytes --]
On 23-08-2013 19:50, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:15:44PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> This patch adds to lm75 temperature sensor the possibility
>> to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
>> thermal framework.
>>
>> The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
>> describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
>> inside the lm75 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
>> will be the same.
>>
>> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
>> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm75.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
>> index c03b490..dc55908 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>> #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> #include "lm75.h"
>>
>>
>> @@ -70,6 +72,7 @@ static const u8 LM75_REG_TEMP[3] = {
>> /* Each client has this additional data */
>> struct lm75_data {
>> struct device *hwmon_dev;
>> + struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
>> struct mutex update_lock;
>> u8 orig_conf;
>> u8 resolution; /* In bits, between 9 and 12 */
>> @@ -92,6 +95,19 @@ static struct lm75_data *lm75_update_device(struct device *dev);
>>
>> /* sysfs attributes for hwmon */
>>
>> +static int lm75_read_temp(void *dev, unsigned long *temp)
>> +{
>> + struct lm75_data *data = lm75_update_device(dev);
>> +
>> + if (IS_ERR(data))
>> + return PTR_ERR(data);
>> +
>> + *temp = ((data->temp[0] >> (16 - data->resolution)) * 1000) >>
>> + (data->resolution - 8);
>> +
> The reported temperature can be negative, which would result in reporting a very
> high temperature (note this applies to the tmp102 driver patch as well).
>
Good point.
> The computation is quite complex and matches the computation done in show_temp().
> Given that, it would make sense to declare an inline function to convert the
> register value to the temperature. This function can take the register value
> and the resolution as argument.
Sounds reasonable. Modifying accordingly in next version.
>
> Guenter
>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *da,
>> char *buf)
>> {
>> @@ -271,11 +287,25 @@ lm75_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> goto exit_remove;
>> }
>>
>> + if (of_find_property(client->dev.of_node, "monitored-zones", NULL)) {
>> + data->tz = thermal_zone_of_device_register(&client->dev,
>> + 0,
>> + false, /* -hwmon */
>> + &client->dev,
>> + lm75_read_temp);
>> + if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
>> + status = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
>> + goto exit_hwmon;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> dev_info(&client->dev, "%s: sensor '%s'\n",
>> dev_name(data->hwmon_dev), client->name);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> +exit_hwmon:
>> + hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
>> exit_remove:
>> sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm75_group);
>> return status;
>> @@ -285,6 +315,7 @@ static int lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> {
>> struct lm75_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>>
>> + thermal_zone_device_unregister(data->tz);
>> hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
>> sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm75_group);
>> lm75_write_value(client, LM75_REG_CONF, data->orig_conf);
>> --
>> 1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d
>>
>>
>
>
--
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)
Eduardo Valentin
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>,
swarren@wwwdotorg.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ian.campbell@citrix.com, grant.likely@linaro.org,
rob.herring@calxeda.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, wni@nvidia.com,
durgadoss.r@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH 03/14] hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:15:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521B46F4.7080507@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130823235049.GB14810@roeck-us.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3894 bytes --]
On 23-08-2013 19:50, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:15:44PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> This patch adds to lm75 temperature sensor the possibility
>> to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
>> thermal framework.
>>
>> The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
>> describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
>> inside the lm75 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
>> will be the same.
>>
>> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
>> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm75.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
>> index c03b490..dc55908 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>> #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> #include "lm75.h"
>>
>>
>> @@ -70,6 +72,7 @@ static const u8 LM75_REG_TEMP[3] = {
>> /* Each client has this additional data */
>> struct lm75_data {
>> struct device *hwmon_dev;
>> + struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
>> struct mutex update_lock;
>> u8 orig_conf;
>> u8 resolution; /* In bits, between 9 and 12 */
>> @@ -92,6 +95,19 @@ static struct lm75_data *lm75_update_device(struct device *dev);
>>
>> /* sysfs attributes for hwmon */
>>
>> +static int lm75_read_temp(void *dev, unsigned long *temp)
>> +{
>> + struct lm75_data *data = lm75_update_device(dev);
>> +
>> + if (IS_ERR(data))
>> + return PTR_ERR(data);
>> +
>> + *temp = ((data->temp[0] >> (16 - data->resolution)) * 1000) >>
>> + (data->resolution - 8);
>> +
> The reported temperature can be negative, which would result in reporting a very
> high temperature (note this applies to the tmp102 driver patch as well).
>
Good point.
> The computation is quite complex and matches the computation done in show_temp().
> Given that, it would make sense to declare an inline function to convert the
> register value to the temperature. This function can take the register value
> and the resolution as argument.
Sounds reasonable. Modifying accordingly in next version.
>
> Guenter
>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *da,
>> char *buf)
>> {
>> @@ -271,11 +287,25 @@ lm75_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> goto exit_remove;
>> }
>>
>> + if (of_find_property(client->dev.of_node, "monitored-zones", NULL)) {
>> + data->tz = thermal_zone_of_device_register(&client->dev,
>> + 0,
>> + false, /* -hwmon */
>> + &client->dev,
>> + lm75_read_temp);
>> + if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
>> + status = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
>> + goto exit_hwmon;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> dev_info(&client->dev, "%s: sensor '%s'\n",
>> dev_name(data->hwmon_dev), client->name);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> +exit_hwmon:
>> + hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
>> exit_remove:
>> sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm75_group);
>> return status;
>> @@ -285,6 +315,7 @@ static int lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> {
>> struct lm75_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>>
>> + thermal_zone_device_unregister(data->tz);
>> hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
>> sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm75_group);
>> lm75_write_value(client, LM75_REG_CONF, data->orig_conf);
>> --
>> 1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d
>>
>>
>
>
--
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)
Eduardo Valentin
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>,
<swarren@wwwdotorg.org>, <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
<grant.likely@linaro.org>, <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
<rui.zhang@intel.com>, <wni@nvidia.com>, <durgadoss.r@intel.com>,
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/14] hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:15:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521B46F4.7080507@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130823235049.GB14810@roeck-us.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3894 bytes --]
On 23-08-2013 19:50, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:15:44PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> This patch adds to lm75 temperature sensor the possibility
>> to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
>> thermal framework.
>>
>> The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
>> describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
>> inside the lm75 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
>> will be the same.
>>
>> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
>> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm75.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
>> index c03b490..dc55908 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm75.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>> #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> #include "lm75.h"
>>
>>
>> @@ -70,6 +72,7 @@ static const u8 LM75_REG_TEMP[3] = {
>> /* Each client has this additional data */
>> struct lm75_data {
>> struct device *hwmon_dev;
>> + struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
>> struct mutex update_lock;
>> u8 orig_conf;
>> u8 resolution; /* In bits, between 9 and 12 */
>> @@ -92,6 +95,19 @@ static struct lm75_data *lm75_update_device(struct device *dev);
>>
>> /* sysfs attributes for hwmon */
>>
>> +static int lm75_read_temp(void *dev, unsigned long *temp)
>> +{
>> + struct lm75_data *data = lm75_update_device(dev);
>> +
>> + if (IS_ERR(data))
>> + return PTR_ERR(data);
>> +
>> + *temp = ((data->temp[0] >> (16 - data->resolution)) * 1000) >>
>> + (data->resolution - 8);
>> +
> The reported temperature can be negative, which would result in reporting a very
> high temperature (note this applies to the tmp102 driver patch as well).
>
Good point.
> The computation is quite complex and matches the computation done in show_temp().
> Given that, it would make sense to declare an inline function to convert the
> register value to the temperature. This function can take the register value
> and the resolution as argument.
Sounds reasonable. Modifying accordingly in next version.
>
> Guenter
>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *da,
>> char *buf)
>> {
>> @@ -271,11 +287,25 @@ lm75_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> goto exit_remove;
>> }
>>
>> + if (of_find_property(client->dev.of_node, "monitored-zones", NULL)) {
>> + data->tz = thermal_zone_of_device_register(&client->dev,
>> + 0,
>> + false, /* -hwmon */
>> + &client->dev,
>> + lm75_read_temp);
>> + if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
>> + status = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
>> + goto exit_hwmon;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> dev_info(&client->dev, "%s: sensor '%s'\n",
>> dev_name(data->hwmon_dev), client->name);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> +exit_hwmon:
>> + hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
>> exit_remove:
>> sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm75_group);
>> return status;
>> @@ -285,6 +315,7 @@ static int lm75_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> {
>> struct lm75_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>>
>> + thermal_zone_device_unregister(data->tz);
>> hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
>> sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &lm75_group);
>> lm75_write_value(client, LM75_REG_CONF, data->orig_conf);
>> --
>> 1.8.2.1.342.gfa7285d
>>
>>
>
>
--
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)
Eduardo Valentin
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-26 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-23 23:15 [RFC PATCH 00/14] RFCv2: device thermal limits represented in device tree nodes Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 01/14] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: add dt node parsing for 'cooling-zones' Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 4:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-26 4:54 ` [lm-sensors] " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-26 12:13 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 12:13 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 12:13 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 9:29 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 9:29 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 13:05 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 13:05 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 13:05 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 13:05 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 10:22 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 10:22 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 13:44 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 13:44 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 16:23 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 16:23 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 18:17 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 18:17 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-29 23:19 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-29 23:19 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-02 8:14 ` Wei Ni
2013-09-02 8:14 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
2013-09-02 16:28 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-02 16:28 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-03 13:15 ` Mark Rutland
2013-09-03 13:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Rutland
2013-09-03 17:12 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-03 17:12 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-07 0:19 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-09-07 0:19 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 03/14] hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-23 23:39 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-08-26 12:11 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 12:11 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 12:11 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-23 23:50 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-08-26 12:15 ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
2013-08-26 12:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-26 12:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 10:26 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 10:26 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Rutland
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 04/14] hwmon: tmp102: " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-27 10:27 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-27 10:27 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark Rutland
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 05/14] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: use thermal DT infrastructure Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 06/14] arm: dts: add omap4 CPU thermal data Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 07/14] arm: dts: add omap4430 " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 08/14] arm: dts: add omap4460 " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 09/14] arm: dts: point to cooling-zones on omap4430 cpu node Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 10/14] arm: dts: point to cooling-zones on omap4460 " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 11/14] arm: dts: add omap5 GPU thermal data Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 12/14] arm: dts: add omap5 CORE " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 13/14] arm: dts: add omap5 " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [RFC PATCH 14/14] arm: dts: point to cooling-zones on omap5 cpu node Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-08-23 23:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521B46F4.7080507@ti.com \
--to=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=durgadoss.r@intel.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=wni@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.