From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: separate i.MX28 specific register bits
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 16:06:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309041606.34837.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378299706-6742-3-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de>
Dear Juergen Beisert,
> In order to support i.MX23 and i.MX28 within one driver we need to separate
> the register definitions which differ in both SoC variants.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
> CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> CC: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
> CC: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> CC: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 60
> ++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 28
> deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c index dffca90..00e0c29 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> @@ -179,24 +179,28 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
> };
>
> #define LRADC_CTRL0 0x00
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_TOUCH_DETECT_ENABLE (1 << 23)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_TOUCH_SCREEN_TYPE (1 << 22)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_YNNSW /* YM */ (1 << 21)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_YPNSW /* YP */ (1 << 20)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_YPPSW /* YP */ (1 << 19)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_XNNSW /* XM */ (1 << 18)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_XNPSW /* XM */ (1 << 17)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_XPPSW /* XP */ (1 << 16)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_PLATE_MASK (0x3f << 16)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_TOUCH_DETECT_ENABLE (1 << 23)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_TOUCH_SCREEN_TYPE (1 << 22)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_YNNSW /* YM */ (1 << 21)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_YPNSW /* YP */ (1 << 20)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_YPPSW /* YP */ (1 << 19)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_XNNSW /* XM */ (1 << 18)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_XNPSW /* XM */ (1 << 17)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_XPPSW /* XP */ (1 << 16)
Why do you put this space between # and define?
> +#define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_PLATE_MASK \
> + LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_YNNSW | LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_YPNSW | \
> + LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_YPPSW | LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_XNNSW | \
> + LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_XNPSW | LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_XPPSW
>
> #define LRADC_CTRL1 0x10
> #define LRADC_CTRL1_TOUCH_DETECT_IRQ_EN (1 << 24)
> #define LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ_EN(n) (1 << ((n) + 16))
> -#define LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ_EN_MASK (0x1fff << 16)
> +#define LRADC_CTRL1_MX28_LRADC_IRQ_EN_MASK (0x1fff << 16)
> #define LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ_EN_OFFSET 16
> #define LRADC_CTRL1_TOUCH_DETECT_IRQ (1 << 8)
> #define LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ(n) (1 << (n))
> -#define LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ_MASK 0x1fff
> +#define LRADC_CTRL1_MX28_LRADC_IRQ_MASK 0x1fff
MIght just be easier to define this as
LRADC....IRQ_MASK(id) (((id) == MX23) ? 0x1ff : 0x1fff)
just like the MXS SSP driver does it. Then there won't be so much churn.
[...]
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: separate i.MX28 specific register bits
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 16:06:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309041606.34837.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378299706-6742-3-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de>
Dear Juergen Beisert,
> In order to support i.MX23 and i.MX28 within one driver we need to separate
> the register definitions which differ in both SoC variants.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
> CC: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> CC: devel at driverdev.osuosl.org
> CC: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> CC: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 60
> ++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 28
> deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c index dffca90..00e0c29 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> @@ -179,24 +179,28 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
> };
>
> #define LRADC_CTRL0 0x00
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_TOUCH_DETECT_ENABLE (1 << 23)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_TOUCH_SCREEN_TYPE (1 << 22)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_YNNSW /* YM */ (1 << 21)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_YPNSW /* YP */ (1 << 20)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_YPPSW /* YP */ (1 << 19)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_XNNSW /* XM */ (1 << 18)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_XNPSW /* XM */ (1 << 17)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_XPPSW /* XP */ (1 << 16)
> -#define LRADC_CTRL0_PLATE_MASK (0x3f << 16)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_TOUCH_DETECT_ENABLE (1 << 23)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_TOUCH_SCREEN_TYPE (1 << 22)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_YNNSW /* YM */ (1 << 21)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_YPNSW /* YP */ (1 << 20)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_YPPSW /* YP */ (1 << 19)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_XNNSW /* XM */ (1 << 18)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_XNPSW /* XM */ (1 << 17)
> +# define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_XPPSW /* XP */ (1 << 16)
Why do you put this space between # and define?
> +#define LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_PLATE_MASK \
> + LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_YNNSW | LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_YPNSW | \
> + LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_YPPSW | LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_XNNSW | \
> + LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_XNPSW | LRADC_CTRL0_MX28_XPPSW
>
> #define LRADC_CTRL1 0x10
> #define LRADC_CTRL1_TOUCH_DETECT_IRQ_EN (1 << 24)
> #define LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ_EN(n) (1 << ((n) + 16))
> -#define LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ_EN_MASK (0x1fff << 16)
> +#define LRADC_CTRL1_MX28_LRADC_IRQ_EN_MASK (0x1fff << 16)
> #define LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ_EN_OFFSET 16
> #define LRADC_CTRL1_TOUCH_DETECT_IRQ (1 << 8)
> #define LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ(n) (1 << (n))
> -#define LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ_MASK 0x1fff
> +#define LRADC_CTRL1_MX28_LRADC_IRQ_MASK 0x1fff
MIght just be easier to define this as
LRADC....IRQ_MASK(id) (((id) == MX23) ? 0x1ff : 0x1fff)
just like the MXS SSP driver does it. Then there won't be so much churn.
[...]
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-04 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-04 13:01 [RFC] staging/iio/adc: change the MXS touchscreen driver implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: distinguish i.MX23's and i.MX28's LRADC Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: separate i.MX28 specific register bits Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 14:06 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-09-04 14:06 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-05 7:12 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-05 7:12 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-04 14:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-04 14:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 7:13 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-05 7:13 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 14:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-04 14:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 10:16 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-05 10:16 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-05 10:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 10:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 10:51 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-05 10:51 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-05 18:15 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 18:15 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 18:16 ` [patch] iio: mxs-lradc: use helper functions to simplify the code Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 18:16 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 20:15 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-09-05 20:15 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-09-05 20:29 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-05 20:29 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-06 8:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-06 8:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-06 7:01 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-06 7:01 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-06 7:29 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-06 7:29 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-04 13:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add interrupt driven touch detection Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: Remove old touchscreen detection implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 14:37 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-04 14:37 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 7:10 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-05 7:10 ` Jürgen Beisert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-06 10:08 [RFCv2] staging/iio/adc: change the MXS touchscreen driver implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-06 10:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: separate i.MX28 specific register bits Juergen Beisert
2013-09-06 10:08 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 [RFCv3] staging/iio/adc: change the MXS touchscreen driver implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: separate i.MX28 specific register bits Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` Juergen Beisert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201309041606.34837.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=jbe@pengutronix.de \
--cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.