From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: "Jürgen Beisert" <jbe@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, fabio.estevam@freescale.com,
jic23@cam.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:22:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309101022.36637.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201309100936.14562.jbe@pengutronix.de>
Dear Jürgen Beisert,
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Monday 09 September 2013 18:04:19 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > Distinguish i.MX23 and i.MX28 at runtime and do the same for both SoC
> > > at least for the 4 wire touchscreen.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
> > > CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > CC: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
> > > CC: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> > > CC: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> > > CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
> >
> > This patch seems to combine two things -- register access rework AND
> > adjustment of the driver for MX23 touchscreen.
>
> It reworks the register access to avoid the i.MX23/i.MX28 runtime decision
> all over the code again and again. This is what Dan has recommended in his
> comment.
Sure, but this change should be separated from fixing the touchscreen support
then.
> > Btw the MX23 ADC was already supported,
>
> No. This patch is the first in this series which brings in the specific
> register bits, because the ADC units in the i.MX23 and i.MX28 differ.
>
> > so this "add i.MX23 support" commit message is not accurate.
>
> Hmmm, what else do you think should I write?
You're just correcting the touchscreen support, no ?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:22:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309101022.36637.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201309100936.14562.jbe@pengutronix.de>
Dear J?rgen Beisert,
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Monday 09 September 2013 18:04:19 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > Distinguish i.MX23 and i.MX28 at runtime and do the same for both SoC
> > > at least for the 4 wire touchscreen.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
> > > CC: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > > CC: devel at driverdev.osuosl.org
> > > CC: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> > > CC: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> > > CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
> >
> > This patch seems to combine two things -- register access rework AND
> > adjustment of the driver for MX23 touchscreen.
>
> It reworks the register access to avoid the i.MX23/i.MX28 runtime decision
> all over the code again and again. This is what Dan has recommended in his
> comment.
Sure, but this change should be separated from fixing the touchscreen support
then.
> > Btw the MX23 ADC was already supported,
>
> No. This patch is the first in this series which brings in the specific
> register bits, because the ADC units in the i.MX23 and i.MX28 differ.
>
> > so this "add i.MX23 support" commit message is not accurate.
>
> Hmmm, what else do you think should I write?
You're just correcting the touchscreen support, no ?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-09 8:03 [RFCv3] staging/iio/adc: change the MXS touchscreen driver implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: distinguish i.MX23's and i.MX28's LRADC Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: separate i.MX28 specific register bits Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 16:04 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-09 16:04 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-10 7:36 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-10 7:36 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-10 8:22 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-09-10 8:22 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-10 12:58 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-10 12:58 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-10 13:43 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-10 13:43 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-10 20:54 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-10 20:54 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-10 21:21 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-10 21:21 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-11 7:07 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-11 7:07 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-11 7:06 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-11 7:06 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add interrupt driven touch detection Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: Remove old touchscreen detection implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-09 8:03 ` Juergen Beisert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-06 10:08 [RFCv2] staging/iio/adc: change the MXS touchscreen driver implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-06 10:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver Juergen Beisert
2013-09-06 10:08 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 [RFC] staging/iio/adc: change the MXS touchscreen driver implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC driver Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 13:01 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-04 14:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-04 14:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 10:16 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-05 10:16 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-05 10:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 10:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 10:51 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-05 10:51 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-05 18:15 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-05 18:15 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201309101022.36637.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=jbe@pengutronix.de \
--cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.