From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: increased vmap_area_lock contentions on "n_tty: Move buffers into n_tty_data"
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:38:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130913033803.GB8704@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130913031700.GB23757@kroah.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4002 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:17:00PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 08:51:33AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > FYI, we noticed much increased vmap_area_lock contentions since this
> > commit:
>
> What does that mean? What is happening, are we allocating/removing more
> memory now?
// leave this question to Peter and Tejun. :)
> What type of load were you running that showed this problem?
The increased contentions and lock hold/wait time showed up in a
number of test cases.
The second email has the details, and this section of data is most
illustrating.
8cb06c983822103da1cf 20bafb3d23d108bc0a89
------------------------ ------------------------
3470.31 +1631.0% 60070.49 fat/micro/dd-write/1HDD-cfq-ext4-10dd
3339.57 +1676.9% 59340.71 fat/micro/dd-write/1HDD-cfq-ext4-1dd
2848.79 +1489.1% 45269.54 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_CRR
3563.01 +1515.2% 57548.50 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_MAERTS
2678.64 +1346.0% 38733.80 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_RR
2839.84 +1450.2% 44022.08 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_SENDFILE
3417.37 +1571.4% 57116.34 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_STREAM
2558.59 +1450.8% 39677.58 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_RR
3737.24 +1558.0% 61963.62 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_STREAM
20219.50 +1488.7% 321218.02 lkp-a06/crypto/tcrypt/2s-200-204
21017.17 +1457.1% 327257.41 lkp-a06/crypto/tcrypt/2s-205-210
22109.84 +1240.3% 296346.33 lkp-a06/crypto/tcrypt/2s-401-417
17909.60 +1467.3% 280693.71 lkp-a06/micro/dbench/100%
489739.50 +978.5% 5281916.05 lkp-ne04/micro/aim7/shell_rtns_1
1601675.63 +906.7% 16123642.52 lkp-snb01/micro/aim7/exec_test
12105.00 +2453.6% 309110.42 nhm-white/micro/aim7/dbase
822461.02 +1585.0% 13858430.62 nhm-white/micro/aim7/exec_test
9858.11 +2715.9% 277595.41 nhm-white/micro/aim7/fork_test
3452.91 +1685.5% 61650.74 nhm-white/micro/aim7/fserver
300.14 +2621.5% 8168.53 nhm-white/micro/aim7/misc_rtns_1
345479.21 +1624.5% 5957828.25 nhm-white/micro/aim7/shell_rtns_1
2694.48 +1974.4% 55894.19 nhm-white/sysbench/oltp/100%-600-1000000
4415.67 +1202.2% 57501.52 nhm8/micro/dbench/100%
2284.65 +1505.2% 36672.75 snb-drag/crypto/tcrypt/2s-200-204
2446.02 +1537.1% 40042.87 snb-drag/crypto/tcrypt/2s-205-210
2484.11 +1599.6% 42219.71 snb-drag/crypto/tcrypt/2s-500-504
2118.55 +1155.8% 26604.99 vpx/crypto/tcrypt/2s-200-204
2713.48 +1198.5% 35234.77 vpx/crypto/tcrypt/2s-205-210
2711.31 +973.8% 29114.07 vpx/crypto/tcrypt/2s-301-319
2369.23 +940.3% 24648.12 vpx/crypto/tcrypt/2s-401-417
2620.64 +1428.7% 40060.71 vpx/crypto/tcrypt/2s-500-504
1713.98 +1624.3% 29553.72 vpx/crypto/tcrypt/2s-505-509
3423353.12 +1184.9% 43985148.08 TOTAL lock_stat.vmap_area_lock.holdtime-total
The format of report is
parent commit commit
------------------------ ------------------------
number %change number testbox/testcase/test-params
...
...
...
total number %change total number TOTAL perf-metric-name being compared
Thanks,
Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: increased vmap_area_lock contentions on "n_tty: Move buffers into n_tty_data"
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:38:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130913033803.GB8704@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130913031700.GB23757@kroah.com>
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:17:00PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 08:51:33AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > FYI, we noticed much increased vmap_area_lock contentions since this
> > commit:
>
> What does that mean? What is happening, are we allocating/removing more
> memory now?
// leave this question to Peter and Tejun. :)
> What type of load were you running that showed this problem?
The increased contentions and lock hold/wait time showed up in a
number of test cases.
The second email has the details, and this section of data is most
illustrating.
8cb06c983822103da1cf 20bafb3d23d108bc0a89
------------------------ ------------------------
3470.31 +1631.0% 60070.49 fat/micro/dd-write/1HDD-cfq-ext4-10dd
3339.57 +1676.9% 59340.71 fat/micro/dd-write/1HDD-cfq-ext4-1dd
2848.79 +1489.1% 45269.54 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_CRR
3563.01 +1515.2% 57548.50 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_MAERTS
2678.64 +1346.0% 38733.80 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_RR
2839.84 +1450.2% 44022.08 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_SENDFILE
3417.37 +1571.4% 57116.34 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_STREAM
2558.59 +1450.8% 39677.58 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_RR
3737.24 +1558.0% 61963.62 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_STREAM
20219.50 +1488.7% 321218.02 lkp-a06/crypto/tcrypt/2s-200-204
21017.17 +1457.1% 327257.41 lkp-a06/crypto/tcrypt/2s-205-210
22109.84 +1240.3% 296346.33 lkp-a06/crypto/tcrypt/2s-401-417
17909.60 +1467.3% 280693.71 lkp-a06/micro/dbench/100%
489739.50 +978.5% 5281916.05 lkp-ne04/micro/aim7/shell_rtns_1
1601675.63 +906.7% 16123642.52 lkp-snb01/micro/aim7/exec_test
12105.00 +2453.6% 309110.42 nhm-white/micro/aim7/dbase
822461.02 +1585.0% 13858430.62 nhm-white/micro/aim7/exec_test
9858.11 +2715.9% 277595.41 nhm-white/micro/aim7/fork_test
3452.91 +1685.5% 61650.74 nhm-white/micro/aim7/fserver
300.14 +2621.5% 8168.53 nhm-white/micro/aim7/misc_rtns_1
345479.21 +1624.5% 5957828.25 nhm-white/micro/aim7/shell_rtns_1
2694.48 +1974.4% 55894.19 nhm-white/sysbench/oltp/100%-600-1000000
4415.67 +1202.2% 57501.52 nhm8/micro/dbench/100%
2284.65 +1505.2% 36672.75 snb-drag/crypto/tcrypt/2s-200-204
2446.02 +1537.1% 40042.87 snb-drag/crypto/tcrypt/2s-205-210
2484.11 +1599.6% 42219.71 snb-drag/crypto/tcrypt/2s-500-504
2118.55 +1155.8% 26604.99 vpx/crypto/tcrypt/2s-200-204
2713.48 +1198.5% 35234.77 vpx/crypto/tcrypt/2s-205-210
2711.31 +973.8% 29114.07 vpx/crypto/tcrypt/2s-301-319
2369.23 +940.3% 24648.12 vpx/crypto/tcrypt/2s-401-417
2620.64 +1428.7% 40060.71 vpx/crypto/tcrypt/2s-500-504
1713.98 +1624.3% 29553.72 vpx/crypto/tcrypt/2s-505-509
3423353.12 +1184.9% 43985148.08 TOTAL lock_stat.vmap_area_lock.holdtime-total
The format of report is
parent commit commit
------------------------ ------------------------
number %change number testbox/testcase/test-params
...
...
...
total number %change total number TOTAL perf-metric-name being compared
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-13 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-13 0:51 increased vmap_area_lock contentions on "n_tty: Move buffers into n_tty_data" Fengguang Wu
2013-09-13 0:51 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-09-13 1:09 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-09-13 1:09 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-09-17 15:34 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-17 15:34 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-17 23:22 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-09-17 23:22 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-09-18 0:22 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-18 0:22 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-25 9:04 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-25 9:04 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-25 11:30 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-25 11:30 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-25 14:53 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-25 14:53 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-25 16:02 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-25 16:02 ` Lin Ming
2013-09-26 3:20 ` Andi Kleen
2013-09-26 3:20 ` Andi Kleen
2013-09-26 11:52 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 11:52 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 15:32 ` Andi Kleen
2013-09-26 15:32 ` Andi Kleen
2013-09-26 17:22 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 17:22 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 7:33 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 7:33 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 11:31 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 11:31 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 15:04 ` Greg KH
2013-09-26 15:04 ` Greg KH
2013-09-26 17:35 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 17:35 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 18:05 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 18:05 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 21:42 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 21:42 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 22:21 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-26 22:21 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-18 0:49 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-18 0:49 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-13 3:17 ` Greg KH
2013-09-13 3:17 ` Greg KH
2013-09-13 3:38 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2013-09-13 3:38 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-09-13 3:44 ` Greg KH
2013-09-13 3:44 ` Greg KH
2013-09-13 9:55 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-13 9:55 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-13 12:34 ` Greg KH
2013-09-13 12:34 ` Greg KH
2013-09-17 2:42 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-17 2:42 ` Peter Hurley
2013-09-17 2:56 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-09-17 2:56 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130913033803.GB8704@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.