* [PATCH] perf: fix two warning in bench/numa
@ 2013-09-22 8:49 Wei Yang
2013-09-25 7:35 ` Wei Yang
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2013-09-22 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, acme, mingo; +Cc: Wei Yang
There two warnings in bench/numa, when buiding this on 32-bit machine.
The warning output is attached:
bench/numa.c:1113:20: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
bench/numa.c:1161:6: error: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of t'long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘u64’ [-Werror=format]
This patch fixs these two warnings.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
index 30d1c32..a73c4ed 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata)
/* Check whether our max runtime timed out: */
if (g->p.nr_secs) {
timersub(&stop, &start0, &diff);
- if (diff.tv_sec >= g->p.nr_secs) {
+ if (diff.tv_sec >= (time_t)g->p.nr_secs) {
g->stop_work = true;
break;
}
@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata)
runtime_ns_max += diff.tv_usec * 1000;
if (details >= 0) {
- printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016lx]\n",
+ printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016"PRIu64"]\n",
process_nr, thread_nr, runtime_ns_max / bytes_done, val);
}
fflush(stdout);
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf: fix two warning in bench/numa
2013-09-22 8:49 [PATCH] perf: fix two warning in bench/numa Wei Yang
@ 2013-09-25 7:35 ` Wei Yang
2013-09-25 11:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-30 3:18 ` Wei Yang
2013-11-04 6:54 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Fix two warnings tip-bot for Wei Yang
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2013-09-25 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, acme, mingo; +Cc: Wei Yang
Hi, all
Any comments on this one?
These two warnings will break the compile of perf under 32-bit machine.
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 04:49:24PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>There two warnings in bench/numa, when buiding this on 32-bit machine.
>
>The warning output is attached:
>
>bench/numa.c:1113:20: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
>bench/numa.c:1161:6: error: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'u64' [-Werror=format]
>
>This patch fixs these two warnings.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>---
> tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
>index 30d1c32..a73c4ed 100644
>--- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
>+++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
>@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata)
> /* Check whether our max runtime timed out: */
> if (g->p.nr_secs) {
> timersub(&stop, &start0, &diff);
>- if (diff.tv_sec >= g->p.nr_secs) {
>+ if (diff.tv_sec >= (time_t)g->p.nr_secs) {
> g->stop_work = true;
> break;
> }
>@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata)
> runtime_ns_max += diff.tv_usec * 1000;
>
> if (details >= 0) {
>- printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016lx]\n",
>+ printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016"PRIu64"]\n",
> process_nr, thread_nr, runtime_ns_max / bytes_done, val);
> }
> fflush(stdout);
>--
>1.7.5.4
--
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf: fix two warning in bench/numa
2013-09-25 7:35 ` Wei Yang
@ 2013-09-25 11:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-26 1:16 ` Wei Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2013-09-25 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang; +Cc: linux-kernel, acme, mingo
* Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> Any comments on this one?
>
> These two warnings will break the compile of perf under 32-bit machine.
fix looks good to me.
> >- if (diff.tv_sec >= g->p.nr_secs) {
> >+ if (diff.tv_sec >= (time_t)g->p.nr_secs) {
> >- printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016lx]\n",
> >+ printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016"PRIu64"]\n",
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf: fix two warning in bench/numa
2013-09-25 11:26 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2013-09-26 1:16 ` Wei Yang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2013-09-26 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Wei Yang, linux-kernel, acme, mingo
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:26:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>* Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, all
>>
>> Any comments on this one?
>>
>> These two warnings will break the compile of perf under 32-bit machine.
>
>fix looks good to me.
Thanks for your comments :-)
>
>> >- if (diff.tv_sec >= g->p.nr_secs) {
>> >+ if (diff.tv_sec >= (time_t)g->p.nr_secs) {
>
>> >- printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016lx]\n",
>> >+ printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016"PRIu64"]\n",
>
>Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
>
>Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf: fix two warning in bench/numa
2013-09-22 8:49 [PATCH] perf: fix two warning in bench/numa Wei Yang
2013-09-25 7:35 ` Wei Yang
@ 2013-10-30 3:18 ` Wei Yang
2013-11-04 6:54 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Fix two warnings tip-bot for Wei Yang
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2013-10-30 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, acme, mingo; +Cc: weiyang
Dear maintainer,
Is this one accepted or droped?
Or I missed the right person?
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 04:49:24PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>There two warnings in bench/numa, when buiding this on 32-bit machine.
>
>The warning output is attached:
>
>bench/numa.c:1113:20: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
>bench/numa.c:1161:6: error: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of t'long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘u64’ [-Werror=format]
>
>This patch fixs these two warnings.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>---
> tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
>index 30d1c32..a73c4ed 100644
>--- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
>+++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
>@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata)
> /* Check whether our max runtime timed out: */
> if (g->p.nr_secs) {
> timersub(&stop, &start0, &diff);
>- if (diff.tv_sec >= g->p.nr_secs) {
>+ if (diff.tv_sec >= (time_t)g->p.nr_secs) {
> g->stop_work = true;
> break;
> }
>@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata)
> runtime_ns_max += diff.tv_usec * 1000;
>
> if (details >= 0) {
>- printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016lx]\n",
>+ printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016"PRIu64"]\n",
> process_nr, thread_nr, runtime_ns_max / bytes_done, val);
> }
> fflush(stdout);
>--
>1.7.5.4
--
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Fix two warnings
2013-09-22 8:49 [PATCH] perf: fix two warning in bench/numa Wei Yang
2013-09-25 7:35 ` Wei Yang
2013-10-30 3:18 ` Wei Yang
@ 2013-11-04 6:54 ` tip-bot for Wei Yang
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Wei Yang @ 2013-11-04 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: acme, linux-kernel, mingo, hpa, mingo, weiyang, tglx
Commit-ID: 32bf5bd181026fc99c0e15045abe409167285ba8
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/32bf5bd181026fc99c0e15045abe409167285ba8
Author: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 16:49:24 +0800
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:41:54 -0300
perf bench: Fix two warnings
There are two warnings in bench/numa, when building this on 32-bit
machine.
The warning output is attached:
bench/numa.c:1113:20: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]
bench/numa.c:1161:6: error: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of t'long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘u64’ [-Werror=format]
This patch fixes these two warnings.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1379839764-9245-1-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
index 30d1c32..a73c4ed 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata)
/* Check whether our max runtime timed out: */
if (g->p.nr_secs) {
timersub(&stop, &start0, &diff);
- if (diff.tv_sec >= g->p.nr_secs) {
+ if (diff.tv_sec >= (time_t)g->p.nr_secs) {
g->stop_work = true;
break;
}
@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata)
runtime_ns_max += diff.tv_usec * 1000;
if (details >= 0) {
- printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016lx]\n",
+ printf(" #%2d / %2d: %14.2lf nsecs/op [val: %016"PRIu64"]\n",
process_nr, thread_nr, runtime_ns_max / bytes_done, val);
}
fflush(stdout);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-04 6:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-22 8:49 [PATCH] perf: fix two warning in bench/numa Wei Yang
2013-09-25 7:35 ` Wei Yang
2013-09-25 11:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-26 1:16 ` Wei Yang
2013-10-30 3:18 ` Wei Yang
2013-11-04 6:54 ` [tip:perf/core] perf bench: Fix two warnings tip-bot for Wei Yang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.