From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
huawei.libin@huawei.com, wangyijing@huawei.com,
fenghua.yu@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, guohanjun@huawei.com,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/smpboot: Fix announce_cpu() to printk() the last "OK" properly
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 01:15:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130926231545.GD10123@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130925182936.GD16693@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:29:36PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Indeed, that should be fixed.
Ok, how does a right alighment look like:
[ 0.072399] smpboot: Booting Node 0, Processors #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 OK
[ 0.617005] smpboot: Booting Node 1, Processors #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 OK
[ 1.230005] smpboot: Booting Node 2, Processors #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 OK
[ 1.835005] smpboot: Booting Node 3, Processors #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 OK
[ 2.437005] smpboot: Booting Node 4, Processors #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 OK
[ 3.053005] smpboot: Booting Node 5, Processors #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 OK
[ 3.657009] smpboot: Booting Node 6, Processors #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 OK
[ 4.256005] smpboot: Booting Node 7, Processors #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 OK
?
With lockdep butting in-between it is still readable:
[ 0.063330] SMP alternatives: lockdep: fixing up alternatives
[ 0.064032] smpboot: Booting Node 0, Processors #1
[ 0.141231] SMP alternatives: lockdep: fixing up alternatives
[ 0.142007] #2
[ 0.230210] SMP alternatives: lockdep: fixing up alternatives
[ 0.231007] #3
[ 0.307237] SMP alternatives: lockdep: fixing up alternatives
[ 0.308007] #4
[ 0.384231] SMP alternatives: lockdep: fixing up alternatives
[ 0.385006] #5
[ 0.468237] SMP alternatives: lockdep: fixing up alternatives
[ 0.469007] #6
[ 0.545230] SMP alternatives: lockdep: fixing up alternatives
[ 0.546006] #7 OK
[ 0.626323] Brought up 8 CPUs
[ 0.627004] smpboot: Total of 8 processors activated (64217.00 BogoMIPS)
I admit the digits calculation is a bit clumsy but I didn't want to do
any log_10 crazy jumps through hoops and besides, it should be faster
this way:
--
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 6cacab671f9b..1cf5957b1035 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -653,16 +653,22 @@ static void announce_cpu(int cpu, int apicid)
{
static int current_node = -1;
int node = early_cpu_to_node(cpu);
- int max_cpu_present = find_last_bit(cpumask_bits(cpu_present_mask), NR_CPUS);
+ int num_digits;
if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
if (node != current_node) {
if (current_node > (-1))
pr_cont(" OK\n");
current_node = node;
- pr_info("Booting Node %3d, Processors ", node);
+ pr_info("Booting Node %3d, Processors", node);
}
- pr_cont(" #%4d%s", cpu, cpu == max_cpu_present ? " OK\n" : "");
+ num_digits = 1 + 1 * (cpu > 9) + 1 * (cpu > 99);
+
+ pr_cont("%*s#%d", 4 - num_digits, " ", cpu);
+
+ if (cpu == num_present_cpus() - 1)
+ pr_cont(" OK\n");
+
return;
} else
pr_info("Booting Node %d Processor %d APIC 0x%x\n",
--
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-26 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-05 10:57 [PATCH] x86, smpboot: fix announce_cpu() to print the last OK Libin
2013-09-05 17:52 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/smpboot: Fix announce_cpu() to printk() the last "OK" properly tip-bot for Libin
2013-09-25 10:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-25 18:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-26 23:15 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2013-09-27 6:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-27 10:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 14:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, alternatives: Drop ancient lockdep fixup message Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 8:28 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep, x86/alternatives: " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 14:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Cleanup boot CPUs table Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 10:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 13:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 17:47 ` [PATCH] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 17:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 18:04 ` [PATCH -v1.1] " Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 18:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 19:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 19:36 ` [PATCH -v1.3] " Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:42 ` [PATCH -v1.1] " H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-28 19:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 20:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 23:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-29 9:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29 15:17 ` [PATCH -v1.4] " Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29 15:44 ` [PATCH -v1.1] " H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-30 6:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30 9:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-10-01 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01 9:10 ` [tip:x86/boot] x86/boot: " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2013-10-02 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 12:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-02 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:58 ` [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: " Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 20:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29 5:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-29 2:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Cleanup boot CPUs table Mike Galbraith
2013-09-28 8:28 ` [tip:x86/boot] x86: Improve the printout of the SMP bootup CPU table tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29 4:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-09-27 12:48 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/smpboot: Fix announce_cpu() to printk() the last "OK" properly Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 13:33 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130926231545.GD10123@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.