All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	huawei.libin@huawei.com, wangyijing@huawei.com,
	fenghua.yu@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Cleanup boot CPUs table
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 10:25:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130928082542.GA18198@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130927143554.GF4422@pd.tnic>


* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:

> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> 
> As the new x86 CPU bootup printout format code maintainer, I am taking
> immediate action to improve and clean (and thus indulge my OCD) the
> reporting of the cores when coming up online.
> 
> Fix padding to a right-hand alignment, cleanup code and bind reporting
> width to the max number of supported CPUs on the system, like this:
> 
> [    0.074509] smpboot: Booting Node   0, Processors:      #1  #2  #3  #4  #5  #6  #7 OK
> [    0.644008] smpboot: Booting Node   1, Processors:  #8  #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 OK
> [    1.245006] smpboot: Booting Node   2, Processors: #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 OK
> [    1.864005] smpboot: Booting Node   3, Processors: #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31 OK
> [    2.489005] smpboot: Booting Node   4, Processors: #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39 OK
> [    3.093005] smpboot: Booting Node   5, Processors: #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 OK
> [    3.698005] smpboot: Booting Node   6, Processors: #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55 OK
> [    4.304005] smpboot: Booting Node   7, Processors: #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 OK
> [    4.961413] Brought up 64 CPUs

Awesome!

Could we, with another add-on patch, further compress the first half of 
the output as well?

Advanced output like this would be really cool:

> [    0.074509] x86: Booting node #0, CPUs:       #1  #2  #3  #4  #5  #6  #7
> [    0.644008] x86: Booting node #1, CPUs:   #8  #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15
> [    1.245006] x86: Booting node #2, CPUs:  #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23
> [    1.864005] x86: Booting node #3, CPUs:  #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 #30 #31
> [    2.489005] x86: Booting node #4, CPUs:  #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #39
> [    3.093005] x86: Booting node #5, CPUs:  #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47
> [    3.698005] x86: Booting node #6, CPUs:  #48 #49 #50 #51 #52 #53 #54 #55
> [    4.304005] x86: Booting node #7, CPUs:  #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63
> [    4.961413] x86: Booted up 8 nodes, 64 CPUs

and:

> [    0.072367] x86: Booting node #0, CPUs:     #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 
> [    0.686329] x86: Booted up 1 node, 8 CPUs

Note the typographical details I added:

  - I added an extra space after 'CPUs:' to make the table stand out 
    better from far away

  - Removed the 'OK' - it really does not add any more information than
    the newline already does

  - Changed the 'Brought up' message to be more consistent with the prior
    messages.

  - Added nodes count to the 'Booted up' line. Since we count nodes and
    CPUs, we might as well want to demonstrate our superior counting
    skills and print out both.

  - The 'node' counting uses the new num_digits() function - this was very
    easy to implement in my mockup ;-)

  - Note the singular spelling of 'node' in the 1-node case. Again this 
    was easy in the mockup!

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-28  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-05 10:57 [PATCH] x86, smpboot: fix announce_cpu() to print the last OK Libin
2013-09-05 17:52 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/smpboot: Fix announce_cpu() to printk() the last "OK" properly tip-bot for Libin
2013-09-25 10:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-25 18:29     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-26 23:15       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27  6:51         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-27 10:38           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 14:32             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 14:34               ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, alternatives: Drop ancient lockdep fixup message Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28  8:28                 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep, x86/alternatives: " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 14:35               ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Cleanup boot CPUs table Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28  8:25                 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-09-28 10:23                   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 13:44                     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 17:47                       ` [PATCH] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 17:54                         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 18:04                           ` [PATCH -v1.1] " Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 18:12                             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 19:15                               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:25                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 19:36                                   ` [PATCH -v1.3] " Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:42                                   ` [PATCH -v1.1] " H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-28 19:49                                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:54                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:58                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 20:08                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 23:13                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-29  9:14                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29 15:17                                                 ` [PATCH -v1.4] " Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29 15:44                                                 ` [PATCH -v1.1] " H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-30  6:28                                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-30  9:56                                                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-10-01  8:53                                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-01  9:10                                                       ` [tip:x86/boot] x86/boot: " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2013-10-02 11:52                                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 12:18                                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-02 12:20                                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-02 13:55                                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-28 19:58                                     ` [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: " Ingo Molnar
2013-09-28 20:10                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29  5:10                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-29  2:55                   ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Cleanup boot CPUs table Mike Galbraith
2013-09-28  8:28                 ` [tip:x86/boot] x86: Improve the printout of the SMP bootup CPU table tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2013-09-29  4:25                   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-09-27 12:48           ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/smpboot: Fix announce_cpu() to printk() the last "OK" properly Borislav Petkov
2013-09-27 13:33             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130928082542.GA18198@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.