All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: wakeupgen: AM43x adaptation
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:24:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131008212436.GR8313@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378378535-2967-1-git-send-email-afzal@ti.com>

Hi,

Few minor comments below.

* Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com> [130905 04:03]:
> AM43x has 224 interrupts and 7 banks, make it as maximum values. Keep
> default values as earlier, if am43x is detected, update interrupts and
> banks to maximum.
> 
> Also AM43x has only one cpu, ensure that clearing bitmask at wakeupgen
> is done only for the single existing cpu, existing code assumes that
> there are two cpu's.
> 
> If bitmask is cleared in wakeupgen for the nonexistent second cpu,
> an imprecise abort happens as soon as Kernel switches to user space.
> It was rootcaused by Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c
> index 813c615..899d4946 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c
> @@ -33,8 +33,11 @@
>  #include "omap4-sar-layout.h"
>  #include "common.h"
>  
> -#define MAX_NR_REG_BANKS	5
> -#define MAX_IRQS		160
> +/* maximum value correspond to that of AM43x */
> +#define MAX_NR_REG_BANKS	7
> +#define MAX_IRQS		224
> +#define DEFAULT_NR_REG_BANKS	5
> +#define DEFAULT_IRQS		160
>  #define WKG_MASK_ALL		0x00000000
>  #define WKG_UNMASK_ALL		0xffffffff
>  #define CPU_ENA_OFFSET		0x400

How about define it like this to avoid updating things
in multiple places for new SoCs:

#define AM43X_NR_REG_BANKS	7
#define MAX_NR_REG_BANKS	AM43X_NR_REG_BANKS
...

> @@ -402,6 +405,7 @@ int __init omap_wakeupgen_init(void)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	unsigned int boot_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	bool am43x = soc_is_am43xx() ? true : false;
>  
>  	/* Not supported on OMAP4 ES1.0 silicon */
>  	if (omap_rev() == OMAP4430_REV_ES1_0) {
> @@ -418,12 +422,16 @@ int __init omap_wakeupgen_init(void)
>  		irq_banks = OMAP4_NR_BANKS;
>  		max_irqs = OMAP4_NR_IRQS;
>  		omap_secure_apis = 1;
> +	} else if (am43x) {
> +		irq_banks = MAX_NR_REG_BANKS;
> +		max_irqs = MAX_IRQS;
>  	}

Then here you can have:

		irq_bankse = AM43X_NR_REG_BANKS
		...
  
>  	/* Clear all IRQ bitmasks at wakeupGen level */
>  	for (i = 0; i < irq_banks; i++) {
>  		wakeupgen_writel(0, i, CPU0_ID);
> -		wakeupgen_writel(0, i, CPU1_ID);
> +		if (!am43x)
> +			wakeupgen_writel(0, i, CPU1_ID);
>  	}

Why not use soc_is_am43xx() directly here?

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: wakeupgen: AM43x adaptation
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:24:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131008212436.GR8313@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378378535-2967-1-git-send-email-afzal@ti.com>

Hi,

Few minor comments below.

* Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com> [130905 04:03]:
> AM43x has 224 interrupts and 7 banks, make it as maximum values. Keep
> default values as earlier, if am43x is detected, update interrupts and
> banks to maximum.
> 
> Also AM43x has only one cpu, ensure that clearing bitmask at wakeupgen
> is done only for the single existing cpu, existing code assumes that
> there are two cpu's.
> 
> If bitmask is cleared in wakeupgen for the nonexistent second cpu,
> an imprecise abort happens as soon as Kernel switches to user space.
> It was rootcaused by Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c
> index 813c615..899d4946 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c
> @@ -33,8 +33,11 @@
>  #include "omap4-sar-layout.h"
>  #include "common.h"
>  
> -#define MAX_NR_REG_BANKS	5
> -#define MAX_IRQS		160
> +/* maximum value correspond to that of AM43x */
> +#define MAX_NR_REG_BANKS	7
> +#define MAX_IRQS		224
> +#define DEFAULT_NR_REG_BANKS	5
> +#define DEFAULT_IRQS		160
>  #define WKG_MASK_ALL		0x00000000
>  #define WKG_UNMASK_ALL		0xffffffff
>  #define CPU_ENA_OFFSET		0x400

How about define it like this to avoid updating things
in multiple places for new SoCs:

#define AM43X_NR_REG_BANKS	7
#define MAX_NR_REG_BANKS	AM43X_NR_REG_BANKS
...

> @@ -402,6 +405,7 @@ int __init omap_wakeupgen_init(void)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	unsigned int boot_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	bool am43x = soc_is_am43xx() ? true : false;
>  
>  	/* Not supported on OMAP4 ES1.0 silicon */
>  	if (omap_rev() == OMAP4430_REV_ES1_0) {
> @@ -418,12 +422,16 @@ int __init omap_wakeupgen_init(void)
>  		irq_banks = OMAP4_NR_BANKS;
>  		max_irqs = OMAP4_NR_IRQS;
>  		omap_secure_apis = 1;
> +	} else if (am43x) {
> +		irq_banks = MAX_NR_REG_BANKS;
> +		max_irqs = MAX_IRQS;
>  	}

Then here you can have:

		irq_bankse = AM43X_NR_REG_BANKS
		...
  
>  	/* Clear all IRQ bitmasks at wakeupGen level */
>  	for (i = 0; i < irq_banks; i++) {
>  		wakeupgen_writel(0, i, CPU0_ID);
> -		wakeupgen_writel(0, i, CPU1_ID);
> +		if (!am43x)
> +			wakeupgen_writel(0, i, CPU1_ID);
>  	}

Why not use soc_is_am43xx() directly here?

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-08 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-05 10:55 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: wakeupgen: AM43x adaptation Afzal Mohammed
2013-09-05 10:55 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-09-05 10:55 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-10-08 21:24 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2013-10-08 21:24   ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-09  7:22   ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-10-09  7:22     ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-10-09  7:22     ` Afzal Mohammed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131008212436.GR8313@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=afzal@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.