From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Do not drop device reference twice
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:18:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131030211814.GC7686@mithrandir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGSjJmqu9Ph0znE5XJJOJdeh-UT3z2Cjm7sEMB4F+ZtAvg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1003 bytes --]
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:05:02PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/10/30 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>:
> > device_unregister() already drops its reference to the struct device, so
> > explicitly calling put_device() before device_unregister() can cause the
> > device to have been freed before it can be unregistered.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> I started investigating this problem yesterday and reached the same
> conclusion. The connector path can be easily reproduced on i915.ko:
> get a machine that has an eDP panel, physically disconnect the panel,
> boot the machine, "modprobe i915" and watch the segfault.
>
> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>
> I didn't really bisect, but I believe this is probably a regression
> from "drm/sysfs: sort out minor and connector device object
> lifetimes".
Yes, I think that's the one that broke it.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Do not drop device reference twice
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:18:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131030211814.GC7686@mithrandir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGSjJmqu9Ph0znE5XJJOJdeh-UT3z2Cjm7sEMB4F+ZtAvg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1003 bytes --]
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:05:02PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/10/30 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>:
> > device_unregister() already drops its reference to the struct device, so
> > explicitly calling put_device() before device_unregister() can cause the
> > device to have been freed before it can be unregistered.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> I started investigating this problem yesterday and reached the same
> conclusion. The connector path can be easily reproduced on i915.ko:
> get a machine that has an eDP panel, physically disconnect the panel,
> boot the machine, "modprobe i915" and watch the segfault.
>
> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>
> I didn't really bisect, but I believe this is probably a regression
> from "drm/sysfs: sort out minor and connector device object
> lifetimes".
Yes, I think that's the one that broke it.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-30 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-30 10:59 [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Do not drop device reference twice Thierry Reding
2013-10-30 16:05 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-10-30 16:05 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-10-30 21:18 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2013-10-30 21:18 ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-30 18:06 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-10-30 18:06 ` Ben Widawsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131030211814.GC7686@mithrandir \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.