All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: imx6q: Add missing esai_ahb clock to current clock tree
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 08:58:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140109075827.GP6750@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140109074137.GA14809@MrMyself>

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:41:38PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 02:57:42PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:49:41AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:58:12AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > > >  static struct clk *clk[clk_max];
> > > > > @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ static void __init imx6q_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
> > > > >  	clk[ecspi5]       = imx_clk_gate2("ecspi5",        "ecspi_root",        base + 0x6c, 8);
> > > > >  	clk[enet]         = imx_clk_gate2("enet",          "ipg",               base + 0x6c, 10);
> > > > >  	clk[esai]         = imx_clk_gate2("esai",          "esai_podf",         base + 0x6c, 16);
> > > > > +	clk[esai_ahb]     = imx_clk_gate2("esai_ahb",      "ahb",               base + 0x6c, 16);
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm, having two clocks operating on the same gate bit will get us
> > > > problem in clock disabling.  Clock enabling is fine, since either
> > > > one who calls clk_enable() first will just set the gate bit.  But in
> > > > case that clk_enable() is called on both clocks, and then when either
> > > > clock calls clk_disable(), the gate bit will be cleared and thus breaks
> > > > the other one that might still be in use.
> > > 
> > > Understood. But how could we handle this situation? The only way I can figure
> > > out is to make sure the driver open/close them at the same time, it's not a
> > > perfect way though.
> > 
> > Hmm, we generally leave the gate bit to the clock used to access
> > register, because usually it's the first one to be on and the last one
> > to be off.
> 
> Then we should attach CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED to clk[esai] since clk[esai_ahb] is
> the clock used to access memory, shouldn't we?

Please wait for Mikes input or let's look how a proper solution can look
like. I've already seen the case that a single bit controls multiple
clocks. Hacking around this issue each time is not a solution.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Nicolin Chen <Guangyu.Chen@freescale.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rob@landley.net, pawel.moll@arm.com,
	ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rob.herring@calxeda.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	galak@codeaurora.org, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx6q: Add missing esai_ahb clock to current clock tree
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 08:58:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140109075827.GP6750@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140109074137.GA14809@MrMyself>

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:41:38PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 02:57:42PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:49:41AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:58:12AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > > >  static struct clk *clk[clk_max];
> > > > > @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ static void __init imx6q_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
> > > > >  	clk[ecspi5]       = imx_clk_gate2("ecspi5",        "ecspi_root",        base + 0x6c, 8);
> > > > >  	clk[enet]         = imx_clk_gate2("enet",          "ipg",               base + 0x6c, 10);
> > > > >  	clk[esai]         = imx_clk_gate2("esai",          "esai_podf",         base + 0x6c, 16);
> > > > > +	clk[esai_ahb]     = imx_clk_gate2("esai_ahb",      "ahb",               base + 0x6c, 16);
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm, having two clocks operating on the same gate bit will get us
> > > > problem in clock disabling.  Clock enabling is fine, since either
> > > > one who calls clk_enable() first will just set the gate bit.  But in
> > > > case that clk_enable() is called on both clocks, and then when either
> > > > clock calls clk_disable(), the gate bit will be cleared and thus breaks
> > > > the other one that might still be in use.
> > > 
> > > Understood. But how could we handle this situation? The only way I can figure
> > > out is to make sure the driver open/close them at the same time, it's not a
> > > perfect way though.
> > 
> > Hmm, we generally leave the gate bit to the clock used to access
> > register, because usually it's the first one to be on and the last one
> > to be off.
> 
> Then we should attach CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED to clk[esai] since clk[esai_ahb] is
> the clock used to access memory, shouldn't we?

Please wait for Mikes input or let's look how a proper solution can look
like. I've already seen the case that a single bit controls multiple
clocks. Hacking around this issue each time is not a solution.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Nicolin Chen <Guangyu.Chen@freescale.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com,
	pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, rob@landley.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx6q: Add missing esai_ahb clock to current clock tree
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 08:58:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140109075827.GP6750@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140109074137.GA14809@MrMyself>

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:41:38PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 02:57:42PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:49:41AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:58:12AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > > >  static struct clk *clk[clk_max];
> > > > > @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ static void __init imx6q_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
> > > > >  	clk[ecspi5]       = imx_clk_gate2("ecspi5",        "ecspi_root",        base + 0x6c, 8);
> > > > >  	clk[enet]         = imx_clk_gate2("enet",          "ipg",               base + 0x6c, 10);
> > > > >  	clk[esai]         = imx_clk_gate2("esai",          "esai_podf",         base + 0x6c, 16);
> > > > > +	clk[esai_ahb]     = imx_clk_gate2("esai_ahb",      "ahb",               base + 0x6c, 16);
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm, having two clocks operating on the same gate bit will get us
> > > > problem in clock disabling.  Clock enabling is fine, since either
> > > > one who calls clk_enable() first will just set the gate bit.  But in
> > > > case that clk_enable() is called on both clocks, and then when either
> > > > clock calls clk_disable(), the gate bit will be cleared and thus breaks
> > > > the other one that might still be in use.
> > > 
> > > Understood. But how could we handle this situation? The only way I can figure
> > > out is to make sure the driver open/close them at the same time, it's not a
> > > perfect way though.
> > 
> > Hmm, we generally leave the gate bit to the clock used to access
> > register, because usually it's the first one to be on and the last one
> > to be off.
> 
> Then we should attach CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED to clk[esai] since clk[esai_ahb] is
> the clock used to access memory, shouldn't we?

Please wait for Mikes input or let's look how a proper solution can look
like. I've already seen the case that a single bit controls multiple
clocks. Hacking around this issue each time is not a solution.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-09  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-09  3:04 [PATCH] ARM: imx6q: Add missing esai_ahb clock to current clock tree Nicolin Chen
2014-01-09  3:04 ` Nicolin Chen
2014-01-09  3:04 ` Nicolin Chen
2014-01-09  3:58 ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-09  3:58   ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-09  3:58   ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-09  3:49   ` Nicolin Chen
2014-01-09  3:49     ` Nicolin Chen
2014-01-09  3:49     ` Nicolin Chen
2014-01-09  6:57     ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-09  6:57       ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-09  6:57       ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-09  7:41       ` Nicolin Chen
2014-01-09  7:41         ` Nicolin Chen
2014-01-09  7:41         ` Nicolin Chen
2014-01-09  7:58         ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2014-01-09  7:58           ` Sascha Hauer
2014-01-09  7:58           ` Sascha Hauer
2014-01-09  7:51           ` Nicolin Chen
2014-01-09  7:51             ` Nicolin Chen
2014-01-09  7:51             ` Nicolin Chen
2014-01-09  7:55 ` Sascha Hauer
2014-01-09  7:55   ` Sascha Hauer
2014-01-09  7:55   ` Sascha Hauer
2014-01-09 14:57   ` Gerhard Sittig
2014-01-09 14:57     ` Gerhard Sittig
2014-01-09 14:57     ` Gerhard Sittig
2014-01-09 15:01   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-09 15:01     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-09 15:01     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-10 10:06     ` Sascha Hauer
2014-01-10 10:06       ` Sascha Hauer
2014-01-10 10:06       ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140109075827.GP6750@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.