Re: [PATCH 0/7 RESEND] target-i386: Simplify kvm_cpu_fill_host() and kvm_check_features_against_host()

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:07:47PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 20.01.2014 21:39, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:36:56PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:41:07PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >>> Resend of series submitted on 24 November 2013, that didn't get any reply. Only
> >>> change is a trivial conflict on patch 7/7.
> >>
> >> Question: which tree is the most appropriate to get this in? qom-cpu?
> >> kvm?
> > 
> > Either kvm or my pc tree.
> > Seems unrelated to qom.
> 
> Seems unrelated to PC. ;) I've been maintaining target-i386/cpu.c as
> part of my QOM CPU tree according to MAINTAINERS.

Ah, right. Cool, the less work for me the better.

> I don't mind whether this goes through Paolo's or my tree, but for me to
> take KVM related changes, I expect review from the KVM side.
> 
> > Paolo - want to review and take this?
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas
> 
> >>>  target-i386/cpu.c | 89 +++++++++++++------------------------------------------
> >>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg