From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7 RESEND] target-i386: Simplify kvm_cpu_fill_host() and kvm_check_features_against_host()
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:07:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DD9023.2060204@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140120203923.GD14528@redhat.com>
Am 20.01.2014 21:39, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:36:56PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:41:07PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> Resend of series submitted on 24 November 2013, that didn't get any reply. Only
>>> change is a trivial conflict on patch 7/7.
>>
>> Question: which tree is the most appropriate to get this in? qom-cpu?
>> kvm?
>
> Either kvm or my pc tree.
> Seems unrelated to qom.
Seems unrelated to PC. ;) I've been maintaining target-i386/cpu.c as
part of my QOM CPU tree according to MAINTAINERS.
I don't mind whether this goes through Paolo's or my tree, but for me to
take KVM related changes, I expect review from the KVM side.
> Paolo - want to review and take this?
Regards,
Andreas
>>> target-i386/cpu.c | 89 +++++++++++++------------------------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7 RESEND] target-i386: Simplify kvm_cpu_fill_host() and kvm_check_features_against_host()
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:07:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DD9023.2060204@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140120203923.GD14528@redhat.com>
Am 20.01.2014 21:39, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:36:56PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:41:07PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> Resend of series submitted on 24 November 2013, that didn't get any reply. Only
>>> change is a trivial conflict on patch 7/7.
>>
>> Question: which tree is the most appropriate to get this in? qom-cpu?
>> kvm?
>
> Either kvm or my pc tree.
> Seems unrelated to qom.
Seems unrelated to PC. ;) I've been maintaining target-i386/cpu.c as
part of my QOM CPU tree according to MAINTAINERS.
I don't mind whether this goes through Paolo's or my tree, but for me to
take KVM related changes, I expect review from the KVM side.
> Paolo - want to review and take this?
Regards,
Andreas
>>> target-i386/cpu.c | 89 +++++++++++++------------------------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-20 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-20 16:41 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7 RESEND] target-i386: Simplify kvm_cpu_fill_host() and kvm_check_features_against_host() Eduardo Habkost
2014-01-20 16:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7] target-i386: kvm_cpu_fill_host(): Kill unused code Eduardo Habkost
2014-01-20 16:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] target-i386: kvm_cpu_fill_host(): No need to check level Eduardo Habkost
2014-01-20 16:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] target-i386: kvm_cpu_fill_host(): No need to check CPU vendor Eduardo Habkost
2014-01-20 16:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/7] target-i386: kvm_cpu_fill_host(): No need to check xlevel2 Eduardo Habkost
2014-01-20 21:16 ` Andreas Färber
2014-01-21 10:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-20 16:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] target-i386: kvm_cpu_fill_host(): Set all feature words at end of function Eduardo Habkost
2014-01-20 16:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] target-i386: kvm_cpu_fill_host(): Fill feature words in a loop Eduardo Habkost
2014-01-20 16:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7 v2] target-i386: kvm_check_features_against_host(): Kill feature word array Eduardo Habkost
2014-01-20 18:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7 RESEND] target-i386: Simplify kvm_cpu_fill_host() and kvm_check_features_against_host() Eduardo Habkost
2014-01-20 18:36 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-01-20 20:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-20 20:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-20 21:07 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2014-01-20 21:07 ` Andreas Färber
2014-01-20 22:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-20 22:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-21 10:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-21 10:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-21 10:20 ` Andreas Färber
2014-01-21 10:20 ` Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52DD9023.2060204@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.