From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k_htc: make ->sta_rc_update atomic for most calls
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:14:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140128081433.GA1771@redhat.com> (raw)
sta_rc_update() callback must be atomic, hence we can not take mutexes
or do other operations, which can sleep in ath9k_htc_sta_rc_update().
I think we can just return from ath9k_htc_sta_rc_update(), if it is
called without IEEE80211_RC_SUPP_RATES_CHANGED bit. That will help
with scheduling while atomic bug for most cases (except mesh and IBSS
modes).
For mesh and IBSS I do not see other solution like creating additional
workqueue, because sending firmware command require us to sleep, but
this can be done in additional patch.
Patch partially fixes bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990955
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c
index 608d739..a57af9b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c
@@ -1315,21 +1315,22 @@ static void ath9k_htc_sta_rc_update(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
struct ath_common *common = ath9k_hw_common(priv->ah);
struct ath9k_htc_target_rate trate;
+ if (!(changed & IEEE80211_RC_SUPP_RATES_CHANGED))
+ return;
+
mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
ath9k_htc_ps_wakeup(priv);
- if (changed & IEEE80211_RC_SUPP_RATES_CHANGED) {
- memset(&trate, 0, sizeof(struct ath9k_htc_target_rate));
- ath9k_htc_setup_rate(priv, sta, &trate);
- if (!ath9k_htc_send_rate_cmd(priv, &trate))
- ath_dbg(common, CONFIG,
- "Supported rates for sta: %pM updated, rate caps: 0x%X\n",
- sta->addr, be32_to_cpu(trate.capflags));
- else
- ath_dbg(common, CONFIG,
- "Unable to update supported rates for sta: %pM\n",
- sta->addr);
- }
+ memset(&trate, 0, sizeof(struct ath9k_htc_target_rate));
+ ath9k_htc_setup_rate(priv, sta, &trate);
+ if (!ath9k_htc_send_rate_cmd(priv, &trate))
+ ath_dbg(common, CONFIG,
+ "Supported rates for sta: %pM updated, rate caps: 0x%X\n",
+ sta->addr, be32_to_cpu(trate.capflags));
+ else
+ ath_dbg(common, CONFIG,
+ "Unable to update supported rates for sta: %pM\n",
+ sta->addr);
ath9k_htc_ps_restore(priv);
mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
--
1.7.11.7
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net
Subject: [PATCH] ath9k_htc: make ->sta_rc_update atomic for most calls
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:14:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140128081433.GA1771@redhat.com> (raw)
sta_rc_update() callback must be atomic, hence we can not take mutexes
or do other operations, which can sleep in ath9k_htc_sta_rc_update().
I think we can just return from ath9k_htc_sta_rc_update(), if it is
called without IEEE80211_RC_SUPP_RATES_CHANGED bit. That will help
with scheduling while atomic bug for most cases (except mesh and IBSS
modes).
For mesh and IBSS I do not see other solution like creating additional
workqueue, because sending firmware command require us to sleep, but
this can be done in additional patch.
Patch partially fixes bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990955
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c
index 608d739..a57af9b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c
@@ -1315,21 +1315,22 @@ static void ath9k_htc_sta_rc_update(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
struct ath_common *common = ath9k_hw_common(priv->ah);
struct ath9k_htc_target_rate trate;
+ if (!(changed & IEEE80211_RC_SUPP_RATES_CHANGED))
+ return;
+
mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
ath9k_htc_ps_wakeup(priv);
- if (changed & IEEE80211_RC_SUPP_RATES_CHANGED) {
- memset(&trate, 0, sizeof(struct ath9k_htc_target_rate));
- ath9k_htc_setup_rate(priv, sta, &trate);
- if (!ath9k_htc_send_rate_cmd(priv, &trate))
- ath_dbg(common, CONFIG,
- "Supported rates for sta: %pM updated, rate caps: 0x%X\n",
- sta->addr, be32_to_cpu(trate.capflags));
- else
- ath_dbg(common, CONFIG,
- "Unable to update supported rates for sta: %pM\n",
- sta->addr);
- }
+ memset(&trate, 0, sizeof(struct ath9k_htc_target_rate));
+ ath9k_htc_setup_rate(priv, sta, &trate);
+ if (!ath9k_htc_send_rate_cmd(priv, &trate))
+ ath_dbg(common, CONFIG,
+ "Supported rates for sta: %pM updated, rate caps: 0x%X\n",
+ sta->addr, be32_to_cpu(trate.capflags));
+ else
+ ath_dbg(common, CONFIG,
+ "Unable to update supported rates for sta: %pM\n",
+ sta->addr);
ath9k_htc_ps_restore(priv);
mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
--
1.7.11.7
next reply other threads:[~2014-01-28 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-28 8:14 Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2014-01-28 8:14 ` [PATCH] ath9k_htc: make ->sta_rc_update atomic for most calls Stanislaw Gruszka
2014-01-28 9:30 ` [ath9k-devel] " Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-28 9:30 ` Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140128081433.GA1771@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.