From: pza@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:51:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140201215140.GA1375@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil>
Hi Heiko,
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:03:03PM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> On Monday, 20. January 2014 16:41:43 Heiko St?bner wrote:
> > This series enables the use of the additional cores on Rockchip
> > Cortex-A9 SoCs.
>
> So, two weeks without any general complaints, but I guess part of the more
> general patches could use an ack.
>
> Going forward, what would be best way to merge them?
> As one pull request to arm-soc, or for example splitting them into the first
> three patches going through the misc tree and the rockchip specific stuff going
> through arm-soc? Or something else altogether?
>
>
> > Heiko Stuebner (7):
> > of: add functions to count number of elements in a property
>
> One of the intermediate versions of this patch got a
> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> .
> Mark, is this still true for this variant addressing some additional wished
> from Rob?
>
> And this final version got a "Looks good" from Rob Herring in the original
> thread, but a more formal "ack" might be nice :-) .
>
>
> > dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory
> > misc: sram: implement mmio-sram-reserved option
>
> Philipp, you acked an intermediate version, and this v7 now should also
> contain the two separate loops (1st gathering data and 2nd creating the pool
> parts) you asked for.
>
> Could I persuade you to take a look again?
Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
regards
Philipp
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Philipp Zabel <pza-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Grant Likely
<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
Ian Campbell
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:51:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140201215140.GA1375@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil>
Hi Heiko,
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:03:03PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> On Monday, 20. January 2014 16:41:43 Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > This series enables the use of the additional cores on Rockchip
> > Cortex-A9 SoCs.
>
> So, two weeks without any general complaints, but I guess part of the more
> general patches could use an ack.
>
> Going forward, what would be best way to merge them?
> As one pull request to arm-soc, or for example splitting them into the first
> three patches going through the misc tree and the rockchip specific stuff going
> through arm-soc? Or something else altogether?
>
>
> > Heiko Stuebner (7):
> > of: add functions to count number of elements in a property
>
> One of the intermediate versions of this patch got a
> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> .
> Mark, is this still true for this variant addressing some additional wished
> from Rob?
>
> And this final version got a "Looks good" from Rob Herring in the original
> thread, but a more formal "ack" might be nice :-) .
>
>
> > dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory
> > misc: sram: implement mmio-sram-reserved option
>
> Philipp, you acked an intermediate version, and this v7 now should also
> contain the two separate loops (1st gathering data and 2nd creating the pool
> parts) you asked for.
>
> Could I persuade you to take a look again?
Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Philipp Zabel <pza@pengutronix.de>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
arm@kernel.org, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:51:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140201215140.GA1375@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13010296.nzTT2PqdSR@phil>
Hi Heiko,
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:03:03PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> On Monday, 20. January 2014 16:41:43 Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > This series enables the use of the additional cores on Rockchip
> > Cortex-A9 SoCs.
>
> So, two weeks without any general complaints, but I guess part of the more
> general patches could use an ack.
>
> Going forward, what would be best way to merge them?
> As one pull request to arm-soc, or for example splitting them into the first
> three patches going through the misc tree and the rockchip specific stuff going
> through arm-soc? Or something else altogether?
>
>
> > Heiko Stuebner (7):
> > of: add functions to count number of elements in a property
>
> One of the intermediate versions of this patch got a
> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> .
> Mark, is this still true for this variant addressing some additional wished
> from Rob?
>
> And this final version got a "Looks good" from Rob Herring in the original
> thread, but a more formal "ack" might be nice :-) .
>
>
> > dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory
> > misc: sram: implement mmio-sram-reserved option
>
> Philipp, you acked an intermediate version, and this v7 now should also
> contain the two separate loops (1st gathering data and 2nd creating the pool
> parts) you asked for.
>
> Could I persuade you to take a look again?
Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
regards
Philipp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-01 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-20 15:41 [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:41 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:41 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] of: add functions to count number of elements in a property Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-02-05 11:12 ` Grant Likely
2014-02-05 11:12 ` Grant Likely
2014-02-05 12:05 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-02-05 12:05 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-02-05 12:05 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-02-05 13:53 ` Grant Likely
2014-02-05 13:53 ` Grant Likely
2014-01-20 15:43 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] misc: sram: implement mmio-sram-reserved option Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:43 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:43 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:44 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] ARM: rockchip: add snoop-control-unit Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:44 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] ARM: rockchip: add sram dt nodes and documentation Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:44 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:45 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] ARM: rockchip: add power-management-unit Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:45 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp bringup code Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 15:46 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 16:42 ` [PATCH v7.1 " Heiko Stübner
2014-01-20 16:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-31 22:03 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality Heiko Stübner
2014-01-31 22:03 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-31 22:03 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-01-31 22:12 ` Rob Herring
2014-01-31 22:12 ` Rob Herring
2014-01-31 22:12 ` Rob Herring
2014-02-01 21:51 ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2014-02-01 21:51 ` Philipp Zabel
2014-02-01 21:51 ` Philipp Zabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140201215140.GA1375@pengutronix.de \
--to=pza@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.