From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>, Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Anton Altaparmakov <anton@tuxera.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] unifying write variants for filesystems
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 19:23:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140202192306.GU10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140202192104.GA21959@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:21:04PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> BTW, is there any reason why fuse/dev.c doesn't use atomic kmaps for
> everything? After all, as soon as we'd done kmap() in there, we
> grab a spinlock and don't drop it until just before kunmap(). With
> nothing by memcpy() done in between... Miklos? AFAICS, we only win
s/by/but/ - sorry...
> from switching to kmap_atomic there - we can't block anyway, we don't
> need it to be visible on other CPUs and nesting isn't a problem.
> Looks like it'll be cheaper in highmem cases and do exactly the same
> thing as now for non-highmem... Comments?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>,
Anton Altaparmakov <anton@tuxera.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC] unifying write variants for filesystems
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 19:23:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140202192306.GU10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140202192104.GA21959@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:21:04PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> BTW, is there any reason why fuse/dev.c doesn't use atomic kmaps for
> everything? After all, as soon as we'd done kmap() in there, we
> grab a spinlock and don't drop it until just before kunmap(). With
> nothing by memcpy() done in between... Miklos? AFAICS, we only win
s/by/but/ - sorry...
> from switching to kmap_atomic there - we can't block anyway, we don't
> need it to be visible on other CPUs and nesting isn't a problem.
> Looks like it'll be cheaper in highmem cases and do exactly the same
> thing as now for non-highmem... Comments?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-02 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-12 18:14 [PATCH 0/5] splice: locking changes and code refactoring Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 18:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 18:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] splice: move balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited into pipe_to_file Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 18:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 18:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] splice: nest i_mutex outside pipe_lock Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 18:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 18:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] splice: use splice_from_pipe in generic_file_splice_write Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 18:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 18:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: fix splice_write locking Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 18:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 18:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] splice: stop exporting splice_from_pipe implementation details Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 18:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-13 14:14 ` [PATCH 0/5] splice: locking changes and code refactoring Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-13 14:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-13 23:56 ` Al Viro
2014-01-13 23:56 ` Al Viro
2014-01-14 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-14 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-14 17:20 ` Al Viro
2014-01-14 17:20 ` Al Viro
2014-01-15 18:10 ` Al Viro
2014-01-15 18:10 ` Al Viro
2014-01-18 6:40 ` Al Viro
2014-01-18 7:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-18 7:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-18 7:46 ` Al Viro
2014-01-18 7:56 ` Al Viro
2014-01-18 7:56 ` Al Viro
2014-01-18 8:27 ` Al Viro
2014-01-18 8:44 ` David Miller
2014-01-18 8:44 ` David Miller
2014-02-07 17:10 ` Al Viro
2014-02-07 17:10 ` Al Viro
2014-01-18 19:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-18 20:10 ` Al Viro
2014-01-18 20:27 ` Al Viro
2014-01-18 20:27 ` Al Viro
2014-01-18 20:30 ` Al Viro
2014-01-18 20:30 ` Al Viro
2014-01-19 5:13 ` [RFC] unifying write variants for filesystems Al Viro
2014-01-19 5:13 ` Al Viro
2014-01-20 13:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-20 13:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-20 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-20 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-01 22:43 ` Al Viro
2014-02-01 22:43 ` Al Viro
2014-02-02 0:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-02 2:02 ` Al Viro
2014-02-02 2:02 ` Al Viro
2014-02-02 19:21 ` Al Viro
2014-02-02 19:21 ` Al Viro
2014-02-02 19:23 ` Al Viro [this message]
2014-02-02 19:23 ` Al Viro
2014-02-03 14:41 ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-02-03 14:41 ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-02-03 15:33 ` Al Viro
2014-02-03 15:33 ` Al Viro
2014-02-02 23:16 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2014-02-02 23:16 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2014-02-03 15:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-03 16:24 ` Al Viro
2014-02-03 16:50 ` Dave Kleikamp
2014-02-03 16:23 ` Dave Kleikamp
2014-02-04 12:44 ` Al Viro
2014-02-04 12:44 ` Al Viro
2014-02-04 12:52 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-02-04 12:52 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-02-04 15:17 ` Al Viro
2014-02-04 15:17 ` Al Viro
2014-02-04 17:27 ` Zach Brown
2014-02-04 17:35 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-02-04 18:08 ` Al Viro
2014-02-04 18:08 ` Al Viro
2014-02-04 18:00 ` Al Viro
2014-02-04 18:00 ` Al Viro
2014-02-04 18:33 ` Zach Brown
2014-02-04 18:36 ` Al Viro
2014-02-04 18:36 ` Al Viro
2014-02-05 19:58 ` Al Viro
2014-02-05 20:42 ` Zach Brown
2014-02-06 9:08 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140202192306.GU10323@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=anton@tuxera.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=sage@inktank.com \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=shaggy@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.