From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Bin Gao <bin.gao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Bin Gao <bin.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, tsc: Add missing Baytrail frequency to the table
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:28:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140204132831.GA18029@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140129214754.GA102071@bin.fm.intel.com>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 01:47:54PM -0800, Bin Gao wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 02:04:07PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Actually it does not work. I had the fallback path still in the patch when
> > I tried.
>
> Let's merge the ptach v2 then(continue on msr calibration retuning 0).
> All supported SoCs now have the correct frequency ID coding
> so continuing on non-PIC SoCs has very very small possibility.
x86 maintainers, any comments on this patch (v2)? Without the patch some
Baytrail systems fail to boot 3.14-rc1.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-04 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-23 11:04 [PATCH] x86, tsc: Add missing Baytrail frequency to the table Mika Westerberg
2014-01-23 15:09 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-01-23 15:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-23 15:35 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-01-24 8:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <4460FA1017EA3844B646E90DA4E984057D5A4E9F@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
2014-01-25 9:09 ` Bin Gao
2014-01-27 10:20 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-01-28 12:04 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-01-29 21:47 ` Bin Gao
2014-02-04 13:28 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2014-02-06 5:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86, tsc: Fallback to normal calibration if fast MSR calibration fails Mika Westerberg
2014-02-06 11:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86, tsc: Add missing Baytrail frequency to the table Mika Westerberg
2014-02-06 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86, tsc: Fallback to normal calibration if fast MSR calibration fails Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-06 15:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2014-02-09 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140204132831.GA18029@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bin.gao@intel.com \
--cc=bin.gao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.