All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] clk: mvebu: fix clk init order
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 21:07:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140204210733.36c2eab0@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F10024.4030201@free-electrons.com>

Hello,

On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:58:44 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:

> > @Jason, Andrew, Gregory, Thomas:
> > Now that v3.14 is out, anything against taking this in as fixes for rc1?
> 
> I am not found of this solution I still think it should be done
> at framework level. However we still have this very annoying issue,
> and this fix is better than nothing. So I am not against taking this
> for rc1 with the hope that it will be later revert with a better
> solution.

Same opinion here. I'm fine with this solution as a temporary measure,
but it would be good to solve this problem in a nicer way. Also, making
this change doesn't impact the DT in any way, there is no problem in
having a temporary not perfect solution, and improve it later on.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] clk: mvebu: fix clk init order
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 21:07:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140204210733.36c2eab0@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F10024.4030201@free-electrons.com>

Hello,

On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:58:44 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:

> > @Jason, Andrew, Gregory, Thomas:
> > Now that v3.14 is out, anything against taking this in as fixes for rc1?
> 
> I am not found of this solution I still think it should be done
> at framework level. However we still have this very annoying issue,
> and this fix is better than nothing. So I am not against taking this
> for rc1 with the hope that it will be later revert with a better
> solution.

Same opinion here. I'm fine with this solution as a temporary measure,
but it would be good to solve this problem in a nicer way. Also, making
this change doesn't impact the DT in any way, there is no problem in
having a temporary not perfect solution, and improve it later on.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-04 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-25 18:19 [PATCH 0/4] clk: mvebu: fix clk init order Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] clk: mvebu: armada-370: maintain clock " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] clk: mvebu: armada-xp: " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] clk: mvebu: dove: " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] clk: mvebu: kirkwood: " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 18:19   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 21:32 ` [PATCH 0/4] clk: mvebu: fix clk " Emilio López
2014-01-25 21:32   ` Emilio López
2014-01-25 21:44   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 21:44     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-25 22:11     ` Emilio López
2014-01-25 22:11       ` Emilio López
2014-01-26  0:25       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-26  0:25         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-01-27 14:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-01-27 14:39   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-01-27 18:21   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-27 18:21     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-27 18:28     ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-27 18:28       ` Jason Cooper
2014-01-30 10:24 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-30 10:24   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-01-30 10:31   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-01-30 10:31     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-02-03 23:16     ` Willy Tarreau
2014-02-03 23:16       ` Willy Tarreau
2014-02-03 23:36       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-02-03 23:36         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-02-04 14:58         ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-04 14:58           ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-04 20:07           ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-02-04 20:07             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-05 14:08 ` Mike Turquette
2014-02-05 14:08   ` Mike Turquette
2014-02-05 17:43   ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-05 17:43     ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-05 18:34 ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-05 18:34   ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-06 17:08   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-06 17:08     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-06 18:08     ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-06 18:08       ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-17 14:13   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-17 14:13     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-17 14:25     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 14:25       ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 14:42       ` Emilio López
2014-02-17 14:42         ` Emilio López
2014-02-17 15:04         ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 15:04           ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 15:31           ` Emilio López
2014-02-17 15:31             ` Emilio López
2014-02-17 15:21       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-17 15:21         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-17 15:28         ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 15:28           ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 15:44           ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-17 15:44             ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-17 15:59             ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 15:59               ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 18:19               ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-17 18:19                 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-18  9:47                 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-18  9:47                   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 16:28                   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-19 16:28                     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-02-19 20:24                   ` Emilio López
2014-02-19 20:24                     ` Emilio López

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140204210733.36c2eab0@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.