From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Thierry Reding' <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
'Linus Walleij' <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
'Russell King - ARM Linux' <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
'Eric Miao' <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: add PWM dependencies
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:40:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201402071040.58087.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000d01cf23b1$7c1f8de0$745ea9a0$%han@samsung.com>
On Friday 07 February 2014, Jingoo Han wrote:
> How about the following?
>
> [PATCH 1/7] ARM: pxa: don't select HAVE_PWM
> [PATCH 2/7] ARM: lpc32xx: don't select HAVE_PWM
> [PATCH 3/7] ARM: remove HAVE_PWM config option
> [PATCH 4/7] MIPS: jz4740: don't select HAVE_PWM
> [PATCH 5/7] Input: max8997_haptic: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies
> [PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies
> [PATCH 7/7] pwm: don't use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM)
>
> I would like to merge it through PWM tree.
> After merging these patches, all HAVE_PWM will be removed from
> the mainline kernel. Thank you. :-)
Sounds godo to me, thanks a lot for taking care of this!
I don't see any inter-dependencies between the various patches,
so we could also take the first three through the arm-soc tree
to avoid conflicts with other changes (or possibly the third
one through rmk's ARM tree, if he prefers).
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] backlight: add PWM dependencies
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:40:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201402071040.58087.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000d01cf23b1$7c1f8de0$745ea9a0$%han@samsung.com>
On Friday 07 February 2014, Jingoo Han wrote:
> How about the following?
>
> [PATCH 1/7] ARM: pxa: don't select HAVE_PWM
> [PATCH 2/7] ARM: lpc32xx: don't select HAVE_PWM
> [PATCH 3/7] ARM: remove HAVE_PWM config option
> [PATCH 4/7] MIPS: jz4740: don't select HAVE_PWM
> [PATCH 5/7] Input: max8997_haptic: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies
> [PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies
> [PATCH 7/7] pwm: don't use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM)
>
> I would like to merge it through PWM tree.
> After merging these patches, all HAVE_PWM will be removed from
> the mainline kernel. Thank you. :-)
Sounds godo to me, thanks a lot for taking care of this!
I don't see any inter-dependencies between the various patches,
so we could also take the first three through the arm-soc tree
to avoid conflicts with other changes (or possibly the third
one through rmk's ARM tree, if he prefers).
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-07 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-04 12:57 [PATCH] backlight: add PWM dependencies Linus Walleij
2014-02-04 12:57 ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-05 5:01 ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-05 5:01 ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-05 8:57 ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-05 8:57 ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-06 6:49 ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-06 6:49 ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-06 7:23 ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-06 7:23 ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-06 7:23 ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-06 8:32 ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-06 8:32 ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-06 16:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-06 16:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-06 16:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-06 16:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-07 3:05 ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-07 3:05 ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-07 3:05 ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-07 9:40 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-02-07 9:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-10 10:40 ` Thierry Reding
2014-02-10 10:40 ` Thierry Reding
2014-02-10 11:09 ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-10 11:09 ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-26 13:25 ` Thierry Reding
2014-02-26 13:25 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201402071040.58087.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.