All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Markus Blank-Burian <burian@muenster.de>,
	Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@gmail.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: use an ordered workqueue for cgroup destruction
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:21:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140207152158.GC3304@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1402061541560.31342@eggly.anvils>

On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 03:56:01PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Sometimes the cleanup after memcg hierarchy testing gets stuck in
> mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(), unable to bring non-kmem usage down to 0.
> 
> There may turn out to be several causes, but a major cause is this: the
> workitem to offline parent can get run before workitem to offline child;
> parent's mem_cgroup_reparent_charges() circles around waiting for the
> child's pages to be reparented to its lrus, but it's holding cgroup_mutex
> which prevents the child from reaching its mem_cgroup_reparent_charges().
> 
> Just use an ordered workqueue for cgroup_destroy_wq.
> 
> Fixes: e5fca243abae ("cgroup: use a dedicated workqueue for cgroup destruction")
> Suggested-by: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10+

Applied to cgroup/for-3.14-fixes with comment updated to indicate that
this is temporary.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Markus Blank-Burian <burian@muenster.de>,
	Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@gmail.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: use an ordered workqueue for cgroup destruction
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:21:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140207152158.GC3304@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1402061541560.31342@eggly.anvils>

On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 03:56:01PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Sometimes the cleanup after memcg hierarchy testing gets stuck in
> mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(), unable to bring non-kmem usage down to 0.
> 
> There may turn out to be several causes, but a major cause is this: the
> workitem to offline parent can get run before workitem to offline child;
> parent's mem_cgroup_reparent_charges() circles around waiting for the
> child's pages to be reparented to its lrus, but it's holding cgroup_mutex
> which prevents the child from reaching its mem_cgroup_reparent_charges().
> 
> Just use an ordered workqueue for cgroup_destroy_wq.
> 
> Fixes: e5fca243abae ("cgroup: use a dedicated workqueue for cgroup destruction")
> Suggested-by: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10+

Applied to cgroup/for-3.14-fixes with comment updated to indicate that
this is temporary.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-07 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-06 23:56 [PATCH] cgroup: use an ordered workqueue for cgroup destruction Hugh Dickins
2014-02-06 23:56 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-06 23:56 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-07 14:04 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-07 14:04   ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-07 14:37   ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-07 14:37     ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]     ` <20140207143740.GD5121-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-07 15:13       ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-07 15:13         ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-07 15:13         ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-07 15:28         ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-07 15:28           ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]   ` <20140207140402.GA3304-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-07 20:20     ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-07 20:20       ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-07 20:20       ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-07 20:35       ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-07 20:35         ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-07 21:06         ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-07 21:06           ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-07 15:21 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-02-07 15:21   ` Tejun Heo
     [not found] ` <alpine.LSU.2.11.1402061541560.31342-fupSdm12i1nKWymIFiNcPA@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-07 13:45   ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-07 13:45     ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-07 13:45     ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-07 16:43   ` Johannes Weiner
2014-02-07 16:43     ` Johannes Weiner
2014-02-07 16:43     ` Johannes Weiner
     [not found]     ` <20140207164321.GE6963-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-10 15:46       ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-10 15:46         ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-10 15:46         ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-12 22:59       ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-12 22:59         ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-12 22:59         ` Hugh Dickins
     [not found]         ` <alpine.LSU.2.11.1402121417230.5029-fupSdm12i1nKWymIFiNcPA@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-12 23:06           ` [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: bring back kill_cnt to order css destruction Hugh Dickins
2014-02-12 23:06             ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-12 23:06             ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-13  0:28             ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-13  0:28               ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-13  0:38               ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-13  0:38                 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-13  0:09         ` [PATCH] Revert "cgroup: use an ordered workqueue for cgroup destruction" Tejun Heo
2014-02-13  0:09           ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-13  0:09           ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140207152158.GC3304@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=burian@muenster.de \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=filbranden@google.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=shawn.bohrer@gmail.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.