All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/8] at91: dt: Add at91sam9261 dt SoC support
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:54:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140213085409.GH11498@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FC7E0E.2010503@atmel.com>

On 13/02/2014 at 09:10:54 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote :
> On 12/02/2014 20:47, Jean-Jacques Hiblot :
> >>
> >> You probably copied/pasted it but according to the block diagram, the
> >> sdram controller is not under the apb.
> > You're right I copied/pasted :o) But the addresses of the registers
> > look like typical APB addresses.
> > AFAIK all the registers of this SOC are accessed through the APB
> > (except for OHCI and LCDC)
> 
> Yes, that is the point: if the register bank appears as an APB address,
> I place it on the APB bus.
> The other master interfaces (on AHB) are the ones that the IP uses, not
> us from the CPU point of view...
> 
> So I think that Jean-Jacques DT is okay concerning this.
> 


Ok, I'm perfectly fine with that. Thanks for the answer !

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@traphandler.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	boris brezillon <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] at91: dt: Add at91sam9261 dt SoC support
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:54:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140213085409.GH11498@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FC7E0E.2010503@atmel.com>

On 13/02/2014 at 09:10:54 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote :
> On 12/02/2014 20:47, Jean-Jacques Hiblot :
> >>
> >> You probably copied/pasted it but according to the block diagram, the
> >> sdram controller is not under the apb.
> > You're right I copied/pasted :o) But the addresses of the registers
> > look like typical APB addresses.
> > AFAIK all the registers of this SOC are accessed through the APB
> > (except for OHCI and LCDC)
> 
> Yes, that is the point: if the register bank appears as an APB address,
> I place it on the APB bus.
> The other master interfaces (on AHB) are the ones that the IP uses, not
> us from the CPU point of view...
> 
> So I think that Jean-Jacques DT is okay concerning this.
> 


Ok, I'm perfectly fine with that. Thanks for the answer !

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-13  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-12 10:06 [PATCH v4 0/8] Device Tree support for the at91sam9261ek Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] at91: dt: Adds support for the bus matrix declaration in the DT Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06   ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:45   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-12 10:45     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-12 10:54     ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-02-12 10:54       ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] at91: pinctrl: don't request GPIOs used for interrupts but lock them as IRQ Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06   ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 17:47   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-02-12 17:47     ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-02-24 13:25   ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-24 13:25     ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-25  9:35     ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-25  9:35       ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-25  9:47       ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-25  9:47         ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] at91: dt: Add at91sam9261 dt SoC support Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06   ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 17:28   ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-12 17:28     ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-12 19:47     ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 19:47       ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-13  8:10       ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-02-13  8:10         ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-02-13  8:54         ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2014-02-13  8:54           ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-12 21:04   ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-12 21:04     ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-13  6:11     ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-13  6:11       ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] at91: dt: defconfig: Added the sam9261 to the list of DT-enabled SOCs Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06   ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] at91: dt: sam9261: Device Tree support for the at91sam9261ek Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06   ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] at91: updated the at91_dt_defconfig with support for the ADS7846 Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06   ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: at91: prepare common clk transition for sam9261 SoC Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06   ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] ARM: at91: move sam9261 SoC to common clk Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06   ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] Device Tree support for the at91sam9261ek Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-12 11:14   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-12 12:34   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-12 12:34     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-12 12:36     ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 12:36       ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 12:44       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-12 12:44         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-12 13:01         ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 13:01           ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 12:35   ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 12:35     ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140213085409.GH11498@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.