From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/8] at91: dt: Adds support for the bus matrix declaration in the DT
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:54:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FB52D7.4000906@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FB50BB.5070603@free-electrons.com>
On 12/02/2014 11:45, Gregory CLEMENT :
> Hi Jean-Jacques,
>
> Thanks for this new series, I have one little comment:
>
> On 12/02/2014 11:06, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@traphandler.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
>> index f7ca97b..b8d0b66 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
>> @@ -487,6 +487,28 @@ end:
>> of_node_put(np);
>> }
>>
>> +static struct of_device_id matrix_ids[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9261-bus-matrix", },
>> + { /*sentinel*/ }
I think that we can introduce this compatible string with sam9260
product: "atmel,at91sam9260-bus-matrix".
In addition, can you add this new binding in the documentation file:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
(in another patch with the "dt: bindings: " subject prefix + add the DT
mailing-list: devicetree at vger.kernel.org).
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void at91_dt_matrix(void)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> +
>> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matrix_ids);
>> + if (!np) {
>> + pr_debug("AT91: unable to find compatible bus matrix controller node in dtb\n");
>
> I think that a panic here should be more consistent with the next check.
> Indeed if it fails here then at91_matrix_base will be uninitialized too,
> and it will make the kernel crash when at91_matrix_base will be accessed.
Yes.
> Thanks,
>
> Gregory
>
>
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + at91_matrix_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> + if (!at91_matrix_base)
>> + panic("Impossible to ioremap at91_matrix_base\n");
>> +
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> +}
>> +
>> void __init at91rm9200_dt_initialize(void)
>> {
>> at91_dt_ramc();
>> @@ -506,6 +528,7 @@ void __init at91_dt_initialize(void)
>> at91_dt_rstc();
>> at91_dt_ramc();
>> at91_dt_shdwc();
>> + at91_dt_matrix();
>>
>> /* Init clock subsystem */
>> at91_dt_clock_init();
>>
>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@traphandler.com>,
<b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
Cc: <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] at91: dt: Adds support for the bus matrix declaration in the DT
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:54:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FB52D7.4000906@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FB50BB.5070603@free-electrons.com>
On 12/02/2014 11:45, Gregory CLEMENT :
> Hi Jean-Jacques,
>
> Thanks for this new series, I have one little comment:
>
> On 12/02/2014 11:06, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@traphandler.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
>> index f7ca97b..b8d0b66 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c
>> @@ -487,6 +487,28 @@ end:
>> of_node_put(np);
>> }
>>
>> +static struct of_device_id matrix_ids[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9261-bus-matrix", },
>> + { /*sentinel*/ }
I think that we can introduce this compatible string with sam9260
product: "atmel,at91sam9260-bus-matrix".
In addition, can you add this new binding in the documentation file:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt
(in another patch with the "dt: bindings: " subject prefix + add the DT
mailing-list: devicetree@vger.kernel.org).
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void at91_dt_matrix(void)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> +
>> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matrix_ids);
>> + if (!np) {
>> + pr_debug("AT91: unable to find compatible bus matrix controller node in dtb\n");
>
> I think that a panic here should be more consistent with the next check.
> Indeed if it fails here then at91_matrix_base will be uninitialized too,
> and it will make the kernel crash when at91_matrix_base will be accessed.
Yes.
> Thanks,
>
> Gregory
>
>
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + at91_matrix_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> + if (!at91_matrix_base)
>> + panic("Impossible to ioremap at91_matrix_base\n");
>> +
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> +}
>> +
>> void __init at91rm9200_dt_initialize(void)
>> {
>> at91_dt_ramc();
>> @@ -506,6 +528,7 @@ void __init at91_dt_initialize(void)
>> at91_dt_rstc();
>> at91_dt_ramc();
>> at91_dt_shdwc();
>> + at91_dt_matrix();
>>
>> /* Init clock subsystem */
>> at91_dt_clock_init();
>>
>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-12 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-12 10:06 [PATCH v4 0/8] Device Tree support for the at91sam9261ek Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] at91: dt: Adds support for the bus matrix declaration in the DT Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:45 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-12 10:45 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-12 10:54 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2014-02-12 10:54 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] at91: pinctrl: don't request GPIOs used for interrupts but lock them as IRQ Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 17:47 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-02-12 17:47 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-02-24 13:25 ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-24 13:25 ` Linus Walleij
2014-02-25 9:35 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-25 9:35 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-25 9:47 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-25 9:47 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] at91: dt: Add at91sam9261 dt SoC support Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 17:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-12 17:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-12 19:47 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 19:47 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-13 8:10 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-02-13 8:10 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-02-13 8:54 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-13 8:54 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-12 21:04 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-12 21:04 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-13 6:11 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-13 6:11 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] at91: dt: defconfig: Added the sam9261 to the list of DT-enabled SOCs Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] at91: dt: sam9261: Device Tree support for the at91sam9261ek Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] at91: updated the at91_dt_defconfig with support for the ADS7846 Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: at91: prepare common clk transition for sam9261 SoC Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] ARM: at91: move sam9261 SoC to common clk Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 10:06 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] Device Tree support for the at91sam9261ek Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-12 11:14 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-12 12:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-12 12:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-12 12:36 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 12:36 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 12:44 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-12 12:44 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-12 13:01 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 13:01 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 12:35 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2014-02-12 12:35 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52FB52D7.4000906@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.