All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] agp/intel: can't ioremap flush page - no chipset flushing
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:24:31 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140310182431.GA11424@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394289877.31006.2.camel@x41>

[+cc linux-pci]

On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 03:44:37PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas schreef op za 08-03-2014 om 07:12 [-0700]:
> > I assume you have CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=n (which is perfectly
> > legal); let me know if otherwise.
> 
> $ grep CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT /boot/config-3.14.0-0.rc5.1.local2.fc20.i686 
> # CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is not set
> 
> So, yes, CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=n here.

Thanks.  Can you try the patch below?  I think it should fix the problem.


PCI: Don't check resource_size() in pci_bus_alloc_resource()

From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

When resource_size_t is 32 bits wide, e.g., when CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
is not defined, resource_size() on [mem 0x00000000-0xffffffff] returns 0
because (r->end - r->start + 1) overflows.

Therefore, we can't use "resource_size() == 0" to decide that allocation
from this resource will fail.  allocate_resource() should fail anyway if it
can't satisfy the address constraints, so we should just depend on that.

A [mem 0x00000000-0xffffffff] bus resource is obviously not really valid,
but we do fall back to it as a default when we don't have information about
host bridge apertures.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71611
Fixes: f75b99d5a77d PCI: Enforce bus address limits in resource allocation
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 drivers/pci/bus.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
index 00660cc502c5..38901665c770 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
@@ -162,8 +162,6 @@ static int pci_bus_alloc_from_region(struct pci_bus *bus, struct resource *res,
 
 		avail = *r;
 		pci_clip_resource_to_region(bus, &avail, region);
-		if (!resource_size(&avail))
-			continue;
 
 		/*
 		 * "min" is typically PCIBIOS_MIN_IO or PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM to

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: agp/intel: can't ioremap flush page - no chipset flushing
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:24:31 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140310182431.GA11424@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394289877.31006.2.camel@x41>

[+cc linux-pci]

On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 03:44:37PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas schreef op za 08-03-2014 om 07:12 [-0700]:
> > I assume you have CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=n (which is perfectly
> > legal); let me know if otherwise.
> 
> $ grep CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT /boot/config-3.14.0-0.rc5.1.local2.fc20.i686 
> # CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is not set
> 
> So, yes, CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=n here.

Thanks.  Can you try the patch below?  I think it should fix the problem.


PCI: Don't check resource_size() in pci_bus_alloc_resource()

From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

When resource_size_t is 32 bits wide, e.g., when CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
is not defined, resource_size() on [mem 0x00000000-0xffffffff] returns 0
because (r->end - r->start + 1) overflows.

Therefore, we can't use "resource_size() == 0" to decide that allocation
from this resource will fail.  allocate_resource() should fail anyway if it
can't satisfy the address constraints, so we should just depend on that.

A [mem 0x00000000-0xffffffff] bus resource is obviously not really valid,
but we do fall back to it as a default when we don't have information about
host bridge apertures.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71611
Fixes: f75b99d5a77d PCI: Enforce bus address limits in resource allocation
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 drivers/pci/bus.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
index 00660cc502c5..38901665c770 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
@@ -162,8 +162,6 @@ static int pci_bus_alloc_from_region(struct pci_bus *bus, struct resource *res,
 
 		avail = *r;
 		pci_clip_resource_to_region(bus, &avail, region);
-		if (!resource_size(&avail))
-			continue;
 
 		/*
 		 * "min" is typically PCIBIOS_MIN_IO or PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM to

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-10 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-08 19:06 agp/intel: can't ioremap flush page - no chipset flushing Paul Bolle
2014-02-08 19:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-02-08 19:59   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-02-08 20:22   ` Paul Bolle
2014-02-09  0:02     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-02-09  0:02       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-02-09 13:15       ` Steven Newbury
2014-02-09 13:15         ` [Intel-gfx] " Steven Newbury
2014-02-09 13:25         ` Paul Bolle
2014-02-09 13:25           ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul Bolle
2014-02-09 13:32           ` Steven Newbury
2014-02-09 13:32             ` [Intel-gfx] " Steven Newbury
2014-02-10 21:33           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-02-10 21:33             ` [Intel-gfx] " Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-06 20:25             ` Paul Bolle
2014-03-06 20:25               ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul Bolle
2014-03-06 21:38               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-06 21:38                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-07 20:33               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-07 20:33                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-07  9:48             ` Paul Bolle
2014-03-07  9:48               ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul Bolle
2014-03-07 16:55               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-07 16:55                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-07 17:16                 ` Paul Bolle
2014-03-07 17:16                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul Bolle
2014-03-07 20:40                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-07 20:40                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-07 21:03                     ` Paul Bolle
2014-03-07 21:03                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul Bolle
2014-03-07 22:07                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-07 22:07                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-08 14:12                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-08 14:12                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-08 14:44                       ` Paul Bolle
2014-03-08 14:44                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul Bolle
2014-03-10 18:24                         ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2014-03-10 18:24                           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-10 23:45                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul Bolle
2014-03-10 23:45                             ` Paul Bolle
2014-03-11  0:07                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-11  0:07                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-11  0:15                               ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul Bolle
2014-03-11  2:07                                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-11  9:20                                   ` Paul Bolle
2014-03-11  9:20                                     ` Paul Bolle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140310182431.GA11424@google.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=steve@snewbury.org.uk \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.