All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mporter@linaro.org (Matt Porter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: add bcm590xx regulator driver
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:47:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140311154750.GI25092@beef> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219045232.GD2669@sirena.org.uk>

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:52:32PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 06:17:10PM -0500, Matt Porter wrote:
> 
> > +static struct of_device_id bcm590xx_of_match[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm59056-regs", },
> > +	{ }
> > +};
> 
> This looks pretty much OK however I am in general suspicious of MFDs
> that have subdevices like this in the DT - it doesn't seem like this is
> a reusable device which can appear anywhere else so you're pretty much
> just representing the way that Linux splits things up here rather than a
> reusable IP that can reasonably have a separate binding.
> 
> If you had a binding which did something like enumerate the individual
> IP blocks as individual devices that'd be more interesting, I could see
> for example that a different PMIC might have a different set of register
> compatible regulator IPs laid out.  It looks like that might be doable,
> but it's in no way essential.

Ok I dropped this for v3 in favor of using mfd_add_device() and having
the regulator driver reference the of_node from the parent device.

-Matt


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140311/da50f352/attachment.sig>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Porter <mporter@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Christian Daudt <bcm@fixthebug.org>,
	Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: add bcm590xx regulator driver
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:47:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140311154750.GI25092@beef> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219045232.GD2669@sirena.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1107 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:52:32PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 06:17:10PM -0500, Matt Porter wrote:
> 
> > +static struct of_device_id bcm590xx_of_match[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm59056-regs", },
> > +	{ }
> > +};
> 
> This looks pretty much OK however I am in general suspicious of MFDs
> that have subdevices like this in the DT - it doesn't seem like this is
> a reusable device which can appear anywhere else so you're pretty much
> just representing the way that Linux splits things up here rather than a
> reusable IP that can reasonably have a separate binding.
> 
> If you had a binding which did something like enumerate the individual
> IP blocks as individual devices that'd be more interesting, I could see
> for example that a different PMIC might have a different set of register
> compatible regulator IPs laid out.  It looks like that might be doable,
> but it's in no way essential.

Ok I dropped this for v3 in favor of using mfd_add_device() and having
the regulator driver reference the of_node from the parent device.

-Matt



[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-11 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-18 23:17 [PATCH v2 0/5] BCM59056 PMU regulator support Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17 ` Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mfd: add bcm590xx pmu DT binding Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17   ` Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17   ` Matt Porter
2014-02-19  4:47   ` Mark Brown
2014-02-19  4:47     ` Mark Brown
2014-02-19  4:47     ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 15:49     ` Matt Porter
2014-03-11 15:49       ` Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mfd: add bcm590xx pmu driver Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17   ` Matt Porter
2014-02-19  4:46   ` Mark Brown
2014-02-19  4:46     ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 15:50     ` Matt Porter
2014-03-11 15:50       ` Matt Porter
2014-03-11 15:50       ` Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] regulator: add bcm590xx regulator driver Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17   ` Matt Porter
2014-02-19  4:52   ` Mark Brown
2014-02-19  4:52     ` Mark Brown
2014-02-19  4:52     ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 15:47     ` Matt Porter [this message]
2014-03-11 15:47       ` Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: configs: bcm_defconfig: enable bcm590xx regulator support Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17   ` Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: add bcm590xx pmu support and enable for bcm28155-ap Matt Porter
2014-02-18 23:17   ` Matt Porter
2014-02-19  4:44   ` Mark Brown
2014-02-19  4:44     ` Mark Brown
2014-03-11 15:50     ` Matt Porter
2014-03-11 15:50       ` Matt Porter
2014-03-11 15:50       ` Matt Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140311154750.GI25092@beef \
    --to=mporter@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.