From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86/efi: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 23:02:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140314230201.GF5834@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140310104328.GG10262@console-pimps.org>
On Mon, 10 Mar, at 10:43:28AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> I think we're all pretty much agreed that at the very least
> phys_efi_get_time() can go in the bin. Whatever the outcome of this
> thread that'll happen. The question is whether it makes sense to rip out
> all of the time stuff in one go.
OK, I'm chickening out of doing the full delete for v3.15. How about
something like this instead?
---
From 697c512d44415794396773533715dff45785c585 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:41:08 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] x86/efi: Rip out phys_efi_get_time()
Dan reported that phys_efi_get_time() is doing kmalloc(..., GFP_KERNEL)
under a spinlock which is very clearly a bug. Since phys_efi_get_time()
has no users let's just delete it instead of trying to fix it.
Note that since there are no users of phys_efi_get_time(), it is not
possible to actually trigger a GFP_KERNEL alloc under the spinlock.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 29 -----------------------------
1 file changed, 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
index 395decedfa2b..872214435e9d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -256,21 +256,6 @@ static efi_status_t __init phys_efi_set_virtual_address_map(
return status;
}
-static efi_status_t __init phys_efi_get_time(efi_time_t *tm,
- efi_time_cap_t *tc)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
- efi_status_t status;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
- efi_call_phys_prelog();
- status = efi_call_phys2(efi_phys.get_time, virt_to_phys(tm),
- virt_to_phys(tc));
- efi_call_phys_epilog();
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
- return status;
-}
-
int efi_set_rtc_mmss(const struct timespec *now)
{
unsigned long nowtime = now->tv_sec;
@@ -604,16 +589,9 @@ static int __init efi_runtime_init32(void)
* EFI runtime services before set_virtual_address_map
* is invoked.
*/
- efi_phys.get_time = (efi_get_time_t *)
- (unsigned long)runtime->get_time;
efi_phys.set_virtual_address_map (efi_set_virtual_address_map_t *)
(unsigned long)runtime->set_virtual_address_map;
- /*
- * Make efi_get_time can be called before entering
- * virtual mode.
- */
- efi.get_time = phys_efi_get_time;
early_iounmap(runtime, sizeof(efi_runtime_services_32_t));
return 0;
@@ -635,16 +613,9 @@ static int __init efi_runtime_init64(void)
* EFI runtime services before set_virtual_address_map
* is invoked.
*/
- efi_phys.get_time = (efi_get_time_t *)
- (unsigned long)runtime->get_time;
efi_phys.set_virtual_address_map (efi_set_virtual_address_map_t *)
(unsigned long)runtime->set_virtual_address_map;
- /*
- * Make efi_get_time can be called before entering
- * virtual mode.
- */
- efi.get_time = phys_efi_get_time;
early_iounmap(runtime, sizeof(efi_runtime_services_64_t));
return 0;
--
1.8.5.3
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86/efi: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 23:02:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140314230201.GF5834@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140310104328.GG10262@console-pimps.org>
On Mon, 10 Mar, at 10:43:28AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> I think we're all pretty much agreed that at the very least
> phys_efi_get_time() can go in the bin. Whatever the outcome of this
> thread that'll happen. The question is whether it makes sense to rip out
> all of the time stuff in one go.
OK, I'm chickening out of doing the full delete for v3.15. How about
something like this instead?
---
>From 697c512d44415794396773533715dff45785c585 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:41:08 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] x86/efi: Rip out phys_efi_get_time()
Dan reported that phys_efi_get_time() is doing kmalloc(..., GFP_KERNEL)
under a spinlock which is very clearly a bug. Since phys_efi_get_time()
has no users let's just delete it instead of trying to fix it.
Note that since there are no users of phys_efi_get_time(), it is not
possible to actually trigger a GFP_KERNEL alloc under the spinlock.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 29 -----------------------------
1 file changed, 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
index 395decedfa2b..872214435e9d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -256,21 +256,6 @@ static efi_status_t __init phys_efi_set_virtual_address_map(
return status;
}
-static efi_status_t __init phys_efi_get_time(efi_time_t *tm,
- efi_time_cap_t *tc)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
- efi_status_t status;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
- efi_call_phys_prelog();
- status = efi_call_phys2(efi_phys.get_time, virt_to_phys(tm),
- virt_to_phys(tc));
- efi_call_phys_epilog();
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
- return status;
-}
-
int efi_set_rtc_mmss(const struct timespec *now)
{
unsigned long nowtime = now->tv_sec;
@@ -604,16 +589,9 @@ static int __init efi_runtime_init32(void)
* EFI runtime services before set_virtual_address_map
* is invoked.
*/
- efi_phys.get_time = (efi_get_time_t *)
- (unsigned long)runtime->get_time;
efi_phys.set_virtual_address_map =
(efi_set_virtual_address_map_t *)
(unsigned long)runtime->set_virtual_address_map;
- /*
- * Make efi_get_time can be called before entering
- * virtual mode.
- */
- efi.get_time = phys_efi_get_time;
early_iounmap(runtime, sizeof(efi_runtime_services_32_t));
return 0;
@@ -635,16 +613,9 @@ static int __init efi_runtime_init64(void)
* EFI runtime services before set_virtual_address_map
* is invoked.
*/
- efi_phys.get_time = (efi_get_time_t *)
- (unsigned long)runtime->get_time;
efi_phys.set_virtual_address_map =
(efi_set_virtual_address_map_t *)
(unsigned long)runtime->set_virtual_address_map;
- /*
- * Make efi_get_time can be called before entering
- * virtual mode.
- */
- efi.get_time = phys_efi_get_time;
early_iounmap(runtime, sizeof(efi_runtime_services_64_t));
return 0;
--
1.8.5.3
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-14 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-07 11:20 [patch] x86/efi: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock Dan Carpenter
2014-03-07 11:20 ` Dan Carpenter
[not found] ` <20140307112055.GE2351-mgFCXtclrQlZLf2FXnZxJA@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-07 12:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-07 12:10 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20140307121022.GA32575-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-07 12:25 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-03-07 12:25 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-03-09 6:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-09 6:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-09 7:14 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-03-09 7:14 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-03-09 16:20 ` Matt Fleming
2014-03-09 16:20 ` Matt Fleming
2014-03-09 16:31 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-03-09 16:31 ` Matthew Garrett
[not found] ` <20140309163141.GA18824-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-09 18:50 ` Matt Fleming
2014-03-09 18:50 ` Matt Fleming
2014-03-09 19:00 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-03-09 19:00 ` Matthew Garrett
[not found] ` <20140309190053.GA29555-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-10 9:10 ` Matt Fleming
2014-03-10 9:10 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20140309185028.GB10262-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-10 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-10 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-10 7:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-10 7:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-10 7:45 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-10 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-10 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-10 8:22 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-10 10:43 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20140310104328.GG10262-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-10 11:05 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-10 11:05 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <531DAA7602000078001224EF-ce6RLXgGx+vWGUEhTRrCg1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-10 16:10 ` Matt Fleming
2014-03-10 16:10 ` Matt Fleming
2014-03-14 23:02 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2014-03-14 23:02 ` Matt Fleming
2014-03-10 9:12 ` Matt Fleming
2014-03-10 7:26 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-10 17:07 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-03-10 17:07 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-03-09 7:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-03-09 7:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-03-10 16:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-10 16:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140314230201.GF5834@console-pimps.org \
--to=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=nzimmer@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.