From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Leif Lindholm
<leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/15] arm64: add EFI stub
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:01:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140319160149.GF2214@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395241998.2967.52.camel-PDpCo7skNiwAicBL8TP8PQ@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 03:13:18PM +0000, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 10:57 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:40:31PM +0000, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 18:28 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > If UEFI doesn't handle the caches, the only thing left to EFI_STUB is to
> > > > flush by MVA. We don't need to flush the whole DRAM (and I would even
> > > > recommend it) but at least the relevant kernel code/data touched with
> > > > the MMU disabled.
> > >
> > > So, it goes like this:
> > >
> > > 1) UEFI calls stub with MMU/Caches on. Stub/kernel can be anywhere.
> > > 2) Stub runs and relocates kernel to the desired runtime location
> > > but continues to execute from wherever UEFI loaded it until just
> > > after ExitBootServices().
> > > 3) After ExitBootServices, efi_entry() returns relocated entry point
> > > for kernel to efi_stub_entry() in efi-entry.S where the Dcache and
> > > MMU are turned off, the __flush_dcache_all is called, then the
> > > code jumps to the kernel proper entry point.
> > >
> > > It isn't clear to me if UEFI does cache flushing at ExitBootServices
> > > time, but even so, at least stack use will get cached between then and
> > > the kernel entry point. The stub could conceivably get its hands on the
> > > EFI memmap and invalidate dcache using address ranges from UEFI memory
> > > descriptors so maybe that is the way we should do it.
> >
> > I think the stub just needs to flush the relocated kernel image, ensure
> > it is sync with the memory. Additional flushing can be done by the
> > kernel for bits it writes (like page tables, code patching etc). We can
> > enter the kernel with the SCTLR.I bit set, so it can allocate in an
> > unified cache already and D-cache maintenance would be needed anyway.
>
> How about this?
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S
> index 83bfb72..ed480b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S
> @@ -52,11 +52,19 @@ ENTRY(efi_stub_entry)
> * efi_entry() will have relocated the kernel image if necessary
> * and we return here with device tree address in x0 and the kernel
> * entry point stored at *image_addr. Save those values in registers
> - * which are preserved by __flush_dcache_all.
> + * which are callee preserved.
> */
> - ldr x1, [sp, #16]
> mov x20, x0
> - mov x21, x1
> + ldr x0, [sp, #16]
> + mov x21, x0
BTW, some comments to make it easier to review the code later about
what's at [sp, #16].
> +
> + adrp x1, _text
> + add x1, x1, #:lo12:_text
> + adrp x2, _edata
> + add x2, x2, #:lo12:_edata
> + sub x1, x2, x1
> +
> + bl __flush_dcache_area
Looks fine. We also need a "ic ialluis", is any other part of EFI_STUB
invalidating the I-cache?
We need a patch to invalidate the D-cache for areas of memory that the
kernel touches but I'll do this as a separate patch.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/15] arm64: add EFI stub
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:01:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140319160149.GF2214@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395241998.2967.52.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 03:13:18PM +0000, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 10:57 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:40:31PM +0000, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 18:28 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > If UEFI doesn't handle the caches, the only thing left to EFI_STUB is to
> > > > flush by MVA. We don't need to flush the whole DRAM (and I would even
> > > > recommend it) but at least the relevant kernel code/data touched with
> > > > the MMU disabled.
> > >
> > > So, it goes like this:
> > >
> > > 1) UEFI calls stub with MMU/Caches on. Stub/kernel can be anywhere.
> > > 2) Stub runs and relocates kernel to the desired runtime location
> > > but continues to execute from wherever UEFI loaded it until just
> > > after ExitBootServices().
> > > 3) After ExitBootServices, efi_entry() returns relocated entry point
> > > for kernel to efi_stub_entry() in efi-entry.S where the Dcache and
> > > MMU are turned off, the __flush_dcache_all is called, then the
> > > code jumps to the kernel proper entry point.
> > >
> > > It isn't clear to me if UEFI does cache flushing at ExitBootServices
> > > time, but even so, at least stack use will get cached between then and
> > > the kernel entry point. The stub could conceivably get its hands on the
> > > EFI memmap and invalidate dcache using address ranges from UEFI memory
> > > descriptors so maybe that is the way we should do it.
> >
> > I think the stub just needs to flush the relocated kernel image, ensure
> > it is sync with the memory. Additional flushing can be done by the
> > kernel for bits it writes (like page tables, code patching etc). We can
> > enter the kernel with the SCTLR.I bit set, so it can allocate in an
> > unified cache already and D-cache maintenance would be needed anyway.
>
> How about this?
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S
> index 83bfb72..ed480b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S
> @@ -52,11 +52,19 @@ ENTRY(efi_stub_entry)
> * efi_entry() will have relocated the kernel image if necessary
> * and we return here with device tree address in x0 and the kernel
> * entry point stored at *image_addr. Save those values in registers
> - * which are preserved by __flush_dcache_all.
> + * which are callee preserved.
> */
> - ldr x1, [sp, #16]
> mov x20, x0
> - mov x21, x1
> + ldr x0, [sp, #16]
> + mov x21, x0
BTW, some comments to make it easier to review the code later about
what's at [sp, #16].
> +
> + adrp x1, _text
> + add x1, x1, #:lo12:_text
> + adrp x2, _edata
> + add x2, x2, #:lo12:_edata
> + sub x1, x2, x1
> +
> + bl __flush_dcache_area
Looks fine. We also need a "ic ialluis", is any other part of EFI_STUB
invalidating the I-cache?
We need a patch to invalidate the D-cache for areas of memory that the
kernel touches but I'll do this as a separate patch.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
"matt.fleming@intel.com" <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
"roy.franz@linaro.org" <roy.franz@linaro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/15] arm64: add EFI stub
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:01:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140319160149.GF2214@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395241998.2967.52.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 03:13:18PM +0000, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 10:57 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:40:31PM +0000, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 18:28 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > If UEFI doesn't handle the caches, the only thing left to EFI_STUB is to
> > > > flush by MVA. We don't need to flush the whole DRAM (and I would even
> > > > recommend it) but at least the relevant kernel code/data touched with
> > > > the MMU disabled.
> > >
> > > So, it goes like this:
> > >
> > > 1) UEFI calls stub with MMU/Caches on. Stub/kernel can be anywhere.
> > > 2) Stub runs and relocates kernel to the desired runtime location
> > > but continues to execute from wherever UEFI loaded it until just
> > > after ExitBootServices().
> > > 3) After ExitBootServices, efi_entry() returns relocated entry point
> > > for kernel to efi_stub_entry() in efi-entry.S where the Dcache and
> > > MMU are turned off, the __flush_dcache_all is called, then the
> > > code jumps to the kernel proper entry point.
> > >
> > > It isn't clear to me if UEFI does cache flushing at ExitBootServices
> > > time, but even so, at least stack use will get cached between then and
> > > the kernel entry point. The stub could conceivably get its hands on the
> > > EFI memmap and invalidate dcache using address ranges from UEFI memory
> > > descriptors so maybe that is the way we should do it.
> >
> > I think the stub just needs to flush the relocated kernel image, ensure
> > it is sync with the memory. Additional flushing can be done by the
> > kernel for bits it writes (like page tables, code patching etc). We can
> > enter the kernel with the SCTLR.I bit set, so it can allocate in an
> > unified cache already and D-cache maintenance would be needed anyway.
>
> How about this?
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S
> index 83bfb72..ed480b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S
> @@ -52,11 +52,19 @@ ENTRY(efi_stub_entry)
> * efi_entry() will have relocated the kernel image if necessary
> * and we return here with device tree address in x0 and the kernel
> * entry point stored at *image_addr. Save those values in registers
> - * which are preserved by __flush_dcache_all.
> + * which are callee preserved.
> */
> - ldr x1, [sp, #16]
> mov x20, x0
> - mov x21, x1
> + ldr x0, [sp, #16]
> + mov x21, x0
BTW, some comments to make it easier to review the code later about
what's at [sp, #16].
> +
> + adrp x1, _text
> + add x1, x1, #:lo12:_text
> + adrp x2, _edata
> + add x2, x2, #:lo12:_edata
> + sub x1, x2, x1
> +
> + bl __flush_dcache_area
Looks fine. We also need a "ic ialluis", is any other part of EFI_STUB
invalidating the I-cache?
We need a patch to invalidate the D-cache for areas of memory that the
kernel touches but I'll do this as a separate patch.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-19 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-13 22:46 [PATCH v2 00/14] UEFI support for arm(64) Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] efi: delete stray ARM ifdef Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] efi: x86: Improve cmdline conversion Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] efi: create memory map iteration helper Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` <1394750828-16351-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] lib: add fdt_empty_tree.c Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] efi: Add get_dram_base() helper function Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] efi: add helper function to get UEFI params from FDT Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] doc: efi-stub.txt updates for ARM Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:46 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] efi: Add shared printk wrapper for consistent prefixing Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] efi: Add shared FDT related functions for ARM/ARM64 Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] arm64: Add function to create identity mappings Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] arm64: add EFI stub Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` <1394750828-16351-12-git-send-email-leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-18 12:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-18 12:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-18 12:09 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <20140318120919.GG13200-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-18 14:40 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-18 14:40 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-18 14:40 ` Mark Salter
[not found] ` <1395153629.2967.10.camel-PDpCo7skNiwAicBL8TP8PQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-18 18:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-18 18:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-18 18:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-18 21:40 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-18 21:40 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-18 21:40 ` Mark Salter
[not found] ` <1395178831.2967.29.camel-PDpCo7skNiwAicBL8TP8PQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-18 21:48 ` Roy Franz
2014-03-18 21:48 ` Roy Franz
2014-03-18 21:48 ` Roy Franz
[not found] ` <CAFECyb_NuHBQD3zPouDde3WTyz8RrUu1OWFOt6VWX_U5n1g8MA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-18 22:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-03-18 22:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-03-18 22:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20140318222105.GA11178-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-19 10:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-19 10:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-19 10:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-19 10:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-19 10:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-19 10:57 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <20140319105706.GE2214-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-19 15:13 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-19 15:13 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-19 15:13 ` Mark Salter
[not found] ` <1395241998.2967.52.camel-PDpCo7skNiwAicBL8TP8PQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-19 16:01 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-03-19 16:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-19 16:01 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <20140319160149.GF2214-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-19 16:46 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-19 16:46 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-19 16:46 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] doc: arm64: add description of EFI stub support Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] arm64: add EFI runtime services Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` <1394750828-16351-14-git-send-email-leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-18 12:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-18 12:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-18 12:34 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <20140318123418.GH13200-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-18 14:16 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-18 14:16 ` Mark Salter
2014-03-18 14:16 ` Mark Salter
[not found] ` <1395152209.2967.3.camel-PDpCo7skNiwAicBL8TP8PQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-18 17:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-18 17:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-18 17:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] doc: arm: add UEFI support documentation Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] efi/arm64: ignore dtb= when UEFI SecureBoot is enabled Leif Lindholm
2014-03-13 22:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-03-17 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] UEFI support for arm(64) Matt Fleming
2014-03-17 22:24 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140319160149.GF2214@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.